+1 Checked: [ok] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. [ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ok] License and Notice are correct in source package. [ok] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. [ok]No compiled archives bundled in source archive. [ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts. [ok]The code can be built success in the source package.
nize <uncleran...@gmail.com> 于2022年4月11日周一 15:59写道： > +1 > > I checked: > > Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. > Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > License and Notice are correct in source package. > All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > The code can be built success in the source package. > > jinrongtong <jinrongt...@apache.org> 于2022年4月6日周三 21:13写道： > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > This is the vote for the 2.2.2 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. > > > > > > The artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.2.2-rc1/ > > > > > > The staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1084 > > > > > > Git tag for the release: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/releases/tag/rocketmq-spring-all-2.2.2 > > > > > > Hash for the release tag: > > 1d586a1a5280089a660c439e577fda9e9d908c76 > > > > > > Release Notes: > > > > > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-spring-2.2.2/ > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys > > file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > > Checklist for reference, > > Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking > > releases. > > Fill in the following: > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > > [ ] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > [ ] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > [ ] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts. > > [ ] The code can be built success in the source package. > > > > > > And any other checkpoint is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > this > > email, we sincerely hope for your feedback. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number > of > > votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > The Apache RocketMQ Team >
