+1

I checked the license, notice and checksum, GPG signature.

I also validated compilation instructions of the CPP SDK on a clean docker.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:39 PM aaron ai <yangkun....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.0.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ clients.
>
> Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis
> <https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis>, and are built on top of
> Protocol Buffer and gRPC.
>
> The artifacts:
>
>    -
>
>    Java:
>    
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.0-rc1/
>    -
>
>    CPP:
>    
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/5.0.0-rc1/
>
>
> The staging repo for maven:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1094/
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
>    -
>
>    Java:
>    https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/tree/rocketmq-client-java-5.0.0
>    -
>
>    CPP: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/tree/cpp-5.0.0-rc1
>
>
> Hash for the release tag:
>
>    -
>
>    Java: db031977d2e0a1e0d64e43f3daf10eab080a13ac
>    -
>
>    CPP: 6fcff3207d292d925d06f44148934b8d79c1ab4a
>
>
> Relate Notes:
>
>    -
>
>    Java:
>    
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/rocketmq-client-java-5.0.0
>    -
>
>    CPP:
>    https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-clients/releases/tag/cpp-5.0.0-rc1
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>
> 3A11FEBBD64C807A233BF1F27C46C79BD4D29011, which can be found in the keys
> file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Fill in the following:
>
> [+]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>
> [+]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
> necessary
>
> [+]  extract the zip and check if the source version is correct
>
> [+]  verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
>

Reply via email to