Would like you guys to go through The Apache Way and Committer Guide first:
https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html There's policy and standard for such role, such rights and others, as an incubator project, the most important thing is try to follow The Apache Way. Thanks. Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 12:33 PM, wei zhou <zhouwei198...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, Personally very much agree with the views of Justin, Thank you for > professional guidance, as you help us to join the Apache community. Every > one of us to join the open source community are volunteers, the essence of > the open source community is to share our knowledge of open source, where > only help and help > > On 2017年4月2日, at 10:58, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> As I known, the 'master' here mainly means one of the github project > member roles, others are 'guest' 'reporter' 'develop'. The one who was > elected as 'master' will be granted master privileges to the project, here > is the 'Big Data' project. Then the 'master' could be easily manage the > code repo. > > > > First off, just in case this is unclear, this is how commitership works. > The vote for new committers must take place on the private list and only > PMC votes are binding. Only committers to Apache RocketMQ are given access > to the Apache git repos. > > > > As I understand it this is for some external GitHub repos(?) > > > > It's a little confusing as: > > - We have a vote occurring on an Apache list for something that is not > part of an Apache project > > - It’s unclear who votes are binding (it should only be PPMC members) > > - This seems to have just sprung up out of nowhere, although I may of > missed the discussion? I really would of like to have seen this discussed > on list by the PPMC and others before calling for votes. > > > > I think it would of been better to just ask for volunteers to help out > (preferably committers) and give any who asked the access privileges to > those external repos or to have simply given everyone equal access. > > > > In general votes other that for releases or new committer and PMC member > should be rare and only used once the issue has been discussed and > consensus has been reached. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > >
