Right. -Elias
On 6/26/07, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it's not really a factory in the typical sense, at the end of the day we are basically just using it to provide a consistent way to access the business tier classes. Even when you are using Spring or Guice you are still using a factory, you are just using their own notions of a factory. i.e. a Spring bean factory or a Guice injector. With RollerFactory we are hiding that from users of the api by encapsulating it in our own factory class. -- Allen Elias Torres wrote: > Not that I have been following the discussion, but I thought with Guice, > we didn't need any more factories? :) > > -Elias > > Dave wrote: >> On 6/26/07, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I have a couple final class renamings I'd like to do ... >>> >>> Roller -> Weblogger >>> RollerFactory -> WebloggerFactory >>> RollerImpl -> WebloggerImpl >>> >>> This just makes the most sense now that 'Roller' is the name referring >>> to the entire project and 'Weblogger' and 'Planet' are the actual >>> application specific names. >>> >>> objections? >> None here. >> >> - Dave >>
