+1 Craig
On Feb 5, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Dave wrote:
Sounds like we are in general agreement, which is good because I'd like to get a 4.1 milestone build out ASAP. More comments inline below...On Feb 5, 2008 12:51 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Feb 5, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Dave wrote: Other projects call these builds snapshot releases. There is even infrastructure in place to support snapshot releases in maven, for example.* Tagged in SVN+0 It's not obvious that this improves our ability to track down issues. If it only shows up on a milestone build and not after, does it matter?Yes, that is true. I would like to be able to reproduce milestone builds, but all we really need is an SVN rev number for that -- and the SVN rev number is now baked into the builds.And can we streamline the voting process sothat it does not take months to also get a milestone release out. How can we streamline the process? One way is to NOT require a formal votefor milestone buildand instead just use lazy consensus.Don't even vote. Just publish it.Good, but just for the purpose of coordination, I think the person making the milestone should at least say "I'm going to make a make a milestone build this week, anybody object?" And if nobody objects in a day or so, they should proceed with the build. - Dave
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
