On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Tatyana V. Tokareva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Also maybe it will be better to put user attributes list in some kind of >> > properties file. (right now this list is stored as an enumeration) >> >> I don't think we need to have a fixed list of property names, >> so I guess I don't think we need an enumeration or property. > > This question is still actual for me. > Will it be better to add another one database table > to define all attribute names or just hardcode them?
I missed this question eariler: I would simply define "public static final ..." fields for each attribute name you use. How are you doing with your latest patch? I believe we have a dead-line coming up. - Dave
