On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jeffrey Blattman
<[email protected]>wrote:

> +1


Looks like we have the votes required to make a release of 4.0.1. Unless I
hear objection I will make the files available via the Apache mirrors and
make a release announcement.

Thanks!
- Dave



> On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Dave wrote:
>
>  Committers on the CC line: we need your help!
>>
>> Please VOTE to release: Apache Roller 4.0.1 RC2
>>
>> Here are some facts about the release:
>>  - Created from the Roller 4.0 branch
>>  - Minor bug fixes only and a fix for a security vulnerability
>>  - Here's the change list http://tinyurl.com/4cjfb2
>>  - No database changes
>>  - No dependency changes
>>
>> Binding votes so far:
>>  +1 Anil Gangolli
>>  +1 Matt Raible
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Anil Gangolli <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I did just basic testing.
>>> - Verified sigs on all of the RC2 packages.  Good.
>>> - From scratch 4.0.1 installation with auto db creation.   Went through
>>> the
>>> initial setup process, user, blog, frontpage, test blog entry.  no
>>> problems
>>> encountered
>>> - Checked ROL-1766 fix on aggregated frontpage and a specific blog.
>>> - Ran 4.0.1 against 4.0 with auto db upgrade.  4.0.1 RC 2 properly
>>> detected
>>> it and upgraded version.  Created new blog entry. no problems.
>>> - Checked ROL-1766 fix.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have created a second release candidate that includes fixes for the
>>>> security issue, ROL-1642 and the 4.0 to 4.0.1 database upgrade issue
>>>> that Anil found. The new RC is here:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-4.0.1<http://people.apache.org/%7Esnoopdave/apache-roller-4.0.1>
>>>>
>>>> The full list of fixes made is here http://tinyurl.com/4cjfb2.
>>>>
>>>> The build was made from the current 4.0 branch and compiled with Java
>>>> 1.5.0_16.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to help out, please download the build install it and let
>>>> us know if it looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Vote +1 for release or vote -1 and provide a list of specific reasons
>>>> why the RC should not be released as 4.0.1. If we get any -1 votes,
>>>> we'll figure out how to address them, create RC3 and call for another
>>>> vote... and so on until we have a 4.0.1 release.
>>>>
>>>> - Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to