On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Anil Gangolli wrote: > > Might be easier to factor a base class out, extend and keep them separate > plugins.
I considered that as well but the only real difference in the two is the endpoint URL and that seemed liked overkill for something that would be easy to do with a config property. So essentially I'd like to make the existing plugin a bit more configurable. > On 3/23/2010 8:13 AM, Matthew Montgomery wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've created a comment validator plugin for the TypePad AntiSpam service. >> This service is free for personal and commercial use and actually uses the >> Akismet API. This being the case, I can pretty easily merge the new service >> into the existing Akismet plugin. It would default to the Akismet service >> but allow selection of TypePad AntiSpam as well. Submitting a patch for the >> completely separate plugin is perfectly fine as well but seems somewhat >> undesirable due to the duplication. Assuming there is interest in this, what >> opinions are there around the preferred approach? -- Matthew Montgomery Product Development IT Oracle Corporation
