Hi, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I agree. Type seems like a better choice and more "future proof" > I think having "type" would be reasonable. There might be scenarios like "touch" , "tablet" kind of specific devices.Where developers are looking to develop device optimized themes and set them. So what would be the proper value for a desktop theme. Because that has to be our default value in case the "type" parameter is not set. would <type>desktop</type> a good value to set in a theme by default. (This will be set at the ThemeParser ) Thanks for the suggestion. Regards > > - Dave > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Matt Raible <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Will we ever have themes other than HTML or Mobile? What about TV or > > something like that? I guess we could change it in the future, but can't > > help but think "type" might be better. > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:43 PM, shelan Perera <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Devs, > >> > >> There is a requirement to identify whether a theme is a mobile ready or > >> not.So i am planning to add an additional meta data entry in the > theme.xml. > >> So an extract would appear as below. > >> > >> <id>example1</id> > >> <name>Example1: minimal theme</name> > >> <author>Dave Johnson</author> > >> <mobile>true</mobile> > >> > >> It is not a mandatory field and not defining will set it to default > value > >> "false".Would <isMobile> more appropriate than this tag since it is a > >> boolean. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Shelan Perera > >> > >> Home: http://www.shelan.org > >> Blog : http://www.shelanlk.com > >> Twitter: shelan > >> skype :shelan.perera > >> gtalk :shelanrc > >> > >> I am the master of my fate: > >> I am the captain of my soul. > >> *invictus* > >> > > > -- Shelan Perera Home: http://www.shelan.org Blog : http://www.shelanlk.com Twitter: shelan skype :shelan.perera gtalk :shelanrc I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul. *invictus*
