On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 07/08/2013 08:53 AM, Dave wrote:
>
>> Overall, I think these are very good ideas. Thanks for the proposals. More
>> comments below.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi All, here are the next round of improvements I'd like us to consider
>>> for Roller:
>>>
>>> 1.) Update Spring framework from 2.0.7 & 2.5.6 & 1.2 to the latest
>>> RELEASE
>>> version (3.2.3.RELEASE apparently: http://mvnrepository.com/**
>>> artifact/org.springframework<h**ttp://mvnrepository.com/**
>>> artifact/org.springframework<http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.springframework>
>>> >)**.
>>>   Hopefully we can standardize on one Spring version.
>>>
>>>  My only concern here is that we might break OpenID support, which
>> relied on
>> one specific version of Spring Security if my memory serves me right.
>>
>
> That may indeed happen with a Spring upgrade, for which we'll have a JIRA
> ticket to get OpenID either fixed or replace it with another implementor of
> OpenID that can work with the Spring 3.0 series.  But so long as the JPA
> and UI portions still work, I think the Spring upgrade should still occur.
>  I can't see us going forward with the Spring 2.0.x, it's harder to gain
> committers when they have to work with older tools and it's too much of a
> warning sign for potential users evaluating the software, as that series
> most likely isn't patched anymore.  Also, we'll need to run Spring 3.0.x
> for a few months anyway to catch all the potential incompatibilities with
> Roller code, giving us time to look at the Open ID situation.
>

+1

I think you are right on all points. OpenID support seems like a good idea,
but we've gotten no feedback about yet, positive or negative, and I do not
personally need it in Roller.

If somebody cares about OpenID support then need to speak up and/or help us
update it to work with the newer version of Spring. Hopefully, newer
versions will make it easier not harder to support OpenID.

 - Dave

Reply via email to