Hmm... I think that is a bug. The contentType field should be at the page
(or in this case stylesheet) level and not nested inside templateCode.

- Dave



On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, outputtype will be retained.
>
> But actually, the contentType is defined in the theme.xml's for the theme:
>
>     <!-- stylesheet -->
>     <stylesheet>
>         <name>basic-custom.css</name>
>         <description>Stylesheet for Basic theme</description>
>         <link>basic-custom.css</link>
>         <templateCode>
> <templateLanguage>velocity</templateLanguage>
>             <contentType>text/html</contentType>
> <contentsFile>basic-custom.css</contentsFile>
>             <type>standard</type>
>         </templateCode>
>         <templateCode>
> <templateLanguage>velocity</templateLanguage>
>             <contentType>text/html</contentType>
> <contentsFile>basic-mobile-custom.css</contentsFile>
>             <type>mobile</type>
>         </templateCode>
>     </stylesheet>
>
> Are you sure contentType is of no use?  We can remove it...  Just FYI,
> it's always text/html for our prepackaged themes.
>
> Glen
>
>
> On 07/19/2014 09:24 AM, Dave wrote:
>
>> At this point the UI allows a user to set the content type for a page
>> template and the PageServlet respects that choice. We do not have a way to
>> set the content type for each rendition of a page template, and I'm not
>> sure we really need that feature. So, for now I'd recommend removing
>> content type from custom_template_rendition, since it is not used.
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  But isn't that the contenttype value in custom_template_rendition?
>>>
>>> Glen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/19/2014 08:58 AM, Dave wrote:
>>>
>>>  Please do not remove outputtype either.  Page templates can be used to
>>>> generate XML, JSON and other types of output and you need to be able to
>>>> set
>>>> the content-type when you produce those types.
>>>>
>>>> - Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to