Thanks. The structure there and a lot of the content is great.
We should definitely copy it into docs. We should probably figure out the best way to write the docs and get started… ;-) I just added a link to his wiki from the docs page for now. Does anyone think we need a wiki for the docs repo? Harbs > On Oct 4, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here you go -> https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-10-04 9:04 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> I can’t find Olaf’s wiki. Remind me of the URL? >> >>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Alex. I'm just asking cause I was thinking where I can start with >>> all of that. I believe that documentation is our true weak point. >>> >>> Harbs do you have some plans in case of the docs ? Do you think that >> Olaf's >>> work can be used ? >>> >>> Piotr >>> >>> 2017-10-04 8:54 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>>> I believe we can have it available at a different URL (i.e. >>>> royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs> < >> http://royalesdk.org/docs <http://royalesdk.org/docs>>) using CNAME >> entries: >>>> https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- >> domain-with-github-pages/ <https://help.github.com/ >> articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/> >>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom- >> domain-with-github-pages/ >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure we have that choice. I think we are part of an >> organization >>>>> and have to use a separate repo. Maybe that's better because we have >>>>> several code repos. >>>>> >>>>> The repo is: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-docs >>>>> >>>>> When you push it becomes available here: >>>>> >>>>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/ >>>>> >>>>> Of course, I could be wrong... >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>>> Muppirala" >>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This should make things simpler: >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >>>>>> m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing&data= >>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >>>>>> 61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >>>>>> 26850111393184&sdata=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWl >>>> VQ%3D&rese >>>>>> rved=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Om >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get Outlook for >>>>>>> Android<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook. >>>> com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F >>>>>>> aka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e44661f04aca4c1a08d50ad9 >>>> 2538%7Cfa7b >>>>>>> 1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426850111393184& >>>> sdata=0KYVTdYNd >>>>>>> hKvtS%2B3Ny28BrSOUjdZWdxFcLXkyO4T3wY%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 1:46:14 PM >>>>>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial >>>>>>> content? >>>>>>>> I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH >>>>>>> Pages. >>>>>>>> Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK, put in a request for royale-docs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/3/17, 1:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for royale-docs. If I would like to make something like Olaf >> [1] >>>>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>>>> and move all his already gathered information in that structure >>>>>>> where >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> your opinion guys should it go ? Into the royale-docs as gh pages >> or >>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs as Wiki ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does anyone is against to have it Olaf's work as an starting >> point ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>>>>>>>> o >>>>>>>>>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki&data=02%7C01%7C% >>>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed >>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364261483757 >>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 6455&sdata=KFmOxwgKRbgCW5LTjF0xy8UG%2B6wPjyc744lJ9KTdy00%3D& >> reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-03 9:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> royale-docs is good. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>>>>>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer royale-docs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content >> to >>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>> to. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository >> (or >>>>>>>>>>> whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>> name) and I'll enable it on that - ensure some content in >>>>>>> 'master' >>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>> or 'master/docs' . those pages would then be available on >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.github.io/royale-pages (or whatever)" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we create a royale-pages repo? Anybody think it should >>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>> other name? "royale-documentation"? I think it will hold our >>>>>>>>>>> non-ASDoc >>>>>>>>>>>>> user documentation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:42 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one >>>>>>> per >>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. >>>>>>> Combining >>>>>>>>>>> repos >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be >> examples >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release >>>>>>>>>>> schedule. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to setup an example repo so it’ll build a website >>>>>>> (i.e. >>>>>>>>>>> Github >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages) where the samples could be run. It seems similar to >>>>>>> tourjs >>>>>>>>>>> in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way, but different. “Examples” to me is more like a tutorial >> on >>>>>>>>>>> how to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use Royale while tourjs is more of a reference of the >>>>>>> components. >>>>>>>>>>> They >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem separate and complimentary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Peter Ent >> <p...@adobe.com.INVALID >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been thinking that examples should be moved from >>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put into its own royals-examples repo and then a wiki for >> that >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe the tourjs should be a subdirectory in examples. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‹peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/17, 2:14 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA just informed us that Github Wikis are now an option >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know which repos we want wikis for.[1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs and royale-compiler seem like no-brainers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about royale-typedefs, royale-tourjs and >> royale-website? >>>>>>>>>>> Does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a reason for a wiki in those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At what point do folks think we should set up an ³examples² >>>>>>>>>>> repo? A >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would probably be appropriate on something like that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>>>>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fiss >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> es >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15138% >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3FfocusedCommentId%3D16188401 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page%3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels% >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3Acomment-tabpan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> l% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 23comment-16188401&data=02%7C01%7C% >> 7Cf13e83a4f7594535bec608d509c1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 76d8%7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fa >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1 >> %7C0%7C0%7C636425648884686688& >>>>>>>>>>>>> sdata=%2FSB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> h >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BpyjIfrx%2FcwnFZAxqD%2FGdT3lvte6%2FWItPQDTIqs%3D& >> reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>>>>>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: >>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke >>>>>>>>>> d >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C% >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35 >>>>>>> c2c1 >>>>>>>>>> % >>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >>>>>>> 7C636426148375726455&sdata=9Iu >>>>>>>>>> Y >>>>>>>>>> zi2Xc7Rn%2Fh7fEhdx3%2FZL2zal8uvnWt7%2BA6XPEIU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link >>>>>>>>>> e >>>>>>>>>> din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C% >>>>>>> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6e >>>>>>>>>> d >>>>>>>>>> 2b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426148375 >>>>>>>>>> 7 >>>>>>>>>> 26455&sdata=3wTwkWcXwOhMB1ZbnlyTzLL2FJButx >>>>>>> mx28%2BIbDG80W8%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GitHub: >>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>>>>>>>>> o >>>>>>>>>> m%2Fpiotrzarzycki21&data=02%7C01%7C% >> 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed2b708d50a35 >>>>>>> c2c1%7C >>>>>>>>>> f >>>>>>>>>> a7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >> 7C636426148375726455&sdata= >>>>>>> 9yybfI >>>>>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>>>> 8Klsn70VEawLVOTS0Q2lXbuguuBhjDDF1udo%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>> skype: zarzycki10 >>> >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki < >> http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki> >>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552 < >> https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>> >>> >>> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21 <https://github.com/ >> piotrzarzycki21> >> > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 > skype: zarzycki10 > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
