Carlos, One more comment to the website. I think mailing list should be splitted in somehow into two tables or in whatever other way, where you will present separately emails for subscription and for post on mailing list.
Additionally you cannot forget about nabble which is being used for some people as a main option for communication with Dev/Users lists. Piotr 2017-10-23 21:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Thanks Om! > > just changed it, although that part could be removed in the final feature > page as we plan the final content. For now is only an example, as well the > content in home. I must emphasize that actual content is only demo content > in order to show this website stage > > 2017-10-23 20:26 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Carlos Rovira < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Om, > > > > > > 2017-10-23 2:23 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Fantastic work, Carlos! > > > > > > > > I checked it out on mobile and it looks pretty good there. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your words! :) > > > > > > yes, I put an eye on tablets and mobile, tu set the foundation of all > the > > > work and get a valid skeleton where bring all the content with some > kind > > of > > > ease. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do see a lot of references to Flex in the copy. Please take a > look. > > > > > > > > > > > You refer to footer links? I see on on private page only, If there's > more > > > please let me know to what you refer. As things continue to evolve we > > must > > > to continue iterating all the content, so maybe you could have some > links > > > to apache flex since some things was directly copied from there. > > > > > > > I notice two mentions of Flex: https://snag.gy/iQbBCj.jpg > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Very inspiring 😊 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Om > > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 2017 3:18 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2017-10-22 23:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think so, since Codeoscopic buyed the license already > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to be clear: You bought the license for the Royale site? Or > > are > > > > you > > > > > > saying that Royale is a “client” of Codeoscopic? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I buyed a license, is not a client :) > > > > > so I can use the license to make this site. At least that is what I > > > think > > > > > about this, but let's what others have to say (Specialy Dave > Fisher) > > on > > > > > this regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think there's an Jekyll exporter too but we need to check it > > and > > > > see > > > > > > how it behaves. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds interesting! > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3. What (if any) of the theme can be placed in a public > > repository > > > > to > > > > > > make > > > > > > >> the main site a non-WordPress one? I imagine we’d need to ask > > both > > > > the > > > > > > >> publisher of the theme and Apache legal. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should doesn't do that, since is not what we want, > > > > following > > > > > > the > > > > > > > example exposed before, is like if we use JIRA and for that > > reason > > > > want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > upload the JIRA code to some of our repos...don't see any > reason > > to > > > > do > > > > > > > that. The site is only for marketing purposes and a tool. The > > rest: > > > > > > source > > > > > > > code, binaries, wiki, issues, ... is what we produce and we > > deliver > > > > to > > > > > > our > > > > > > > users. > > > > > > > > > > > > What I mean is like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, the royale.apache.org <http://royale.apache.org/> is > > > built > > > > > > automatically by committing code here: > https://github.com/apache/ > > > > > > royale-website/tree/asf-site <https://github.com/apache/ > > > > > > royale-website/tree/asf-site> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ideally, our main site should be editable by folks simply > applying > > a > > > > pull > > > > > > request on Github. I’m not clear whether the license for the > theme > > > > would > > > > > > allow us to do that by adapting the CSS and JS for a static site. > > The > > > > > > WordPress theme would still be useful as a theme for parts of the > > > site > > > > > such > > > > > > as a blog (and that would not be on a public repo), but I do > think > > we > > > > > want > > > > > > consistent styling across everything. > > > > > > > > > > > > Makes sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lots of sense, Harbs, but in this case we can change that. If we > get > > > and > > > > > static site, that site will have code that is from a commercial > > > product, > > > > so > > > > > we can't upload nothing. That's what I think. > > > > > > > > > > In the other hand, we talked about to have a VM with Wordpress and > > > there > > > > we > > > > > can easily (and thanks to what WP offers in terms of ease), create > > > post, > > > > > modify web parts, change home, and so on, quickly, then export to > > > static > > > > > and put on royale.apache.org (that is what we really need and is > > > > required > > > > > by our apache policies). > > > > > > > > > > We don't need to upload the code site to our repo. That, in my > > opinion > > > is > > > > > something that apache offers as a service for each project for > people > > > > that > > > > > wants to develop the entire site and doesn't have any commercial > > piece. > > > > But > > > > > in our case, using a commercial WP theme can do, but repeat, I > think > > is > > > > not > > > > > what we do. > > > > > > > > > > the website, in Royale, Struts, or other projects is only a tool to > > > > connect > > > > > users and developers with the code, docs, wiki, binaries, issues, > > > mailing > > > > > list and so on. So is not mandatory to anyone to develop something > > from > > > > > scratch and upload to an apache repo. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Harbs > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:47 AM, Carlos Rovira < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-10-22 23:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Carlos, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Very impressive! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The direction is great! Awesome work! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the Kindly words! :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I do have some questions which I think we need to address: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> It looks like you used the Movedo WordPress theme for this[1] > > > which > > > > > is a > > > > > > >> commercial WordPress theme. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> This brings up some questions: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 1. Presumably we’d need to buy a license to use it for the > > > project. > > > > > We’d > > > > > > >> need to ask exactly what the right procedure is for doing so. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think so, since Codeoscopic buyed the license already, > > and > > > as > > > > > > David > > > > > > > Fisher said we can use a commercial projects to market this > > > project, > > > > > > since > > > > > > > is not part of the code of the project, just a tool, like if we > > use > > > > > JIRA > > > > > > or > > > > > > > Itellij IDEA, or other think like that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2. Does this lock us into WordPress? Would we be able to use > > these > > > > > > design > > > > > > >> elements for a “normal” site? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to try to use a plugin to export it and create an static > > > site, > > > > > > > sincerely I never try that before. I think there's an Jekyll > > > exporter > > > > > too > > > > > > > but we need to check it and see how it behaves. In that case, > we > > > can > > > > > > > operate in Wordpress and then export to our production site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3. What (if any) of the theme can be placed in a public > > repository > > > > to > > > > > > make > > > > > > >> the main site a non-WordPress one? I imagine we’d need to ask > > both > > > > the > > > > > > >> publisher of the theme and Apache legal. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should doesn't do that, since is not what we want, > > > > following > > > > > > the > > > > > > > example exposed before, is like if we use JIRA and for that > > reason > > > > want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > upload the JIRA code to some of our repos...don't see any > reason > > to > > > > do > > > > > > > that. The site is only for marketing purposes and a tool. The > > rest: > > > > > > source > > > > > > > code, binaries, wiki, issues, ... is what we produce and we > > deliver > > > > to > > > > > > our > > > > > > > users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 4. Have any other projects done something similar to use as a > > > policy > > > > > > >> trendsetter? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't know, but what made me work on this was some words from > > Dave > > > > > Fisher > > > > > > > in the same line of what I exposed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's see the rest competing about this :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Harbs > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1]https://themeforest.net/item/movedo-we-do-move-your- > > > > world/17923709 > > > > > < > > > > > > >> https://themeforest.net/item/movedo-we-do-move-your-world/ > > > 17923709> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > Director General > > > > > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > > > > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > > > > > > > > Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! <https://avant2.es/#video> > > > > > > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede > contener > > > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje > por > > > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma > vía > > y > > > proceda a su destrucción. > > > > > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le > > comunicamos > > > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es > CODEOSCOPIC > > > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > > > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > > > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a > > nuestras > > > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > > > necesaria. > > > > > > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > > Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! <https://avant2.es/#video> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21
