Royale currently compiles to both JS and to Flash, so you can choose your dependencies. There’s work being done to package a more specialized version which compiles to JS only, and I think that’s what the discussion is referring to.
________________________________ From: Dany Dhondt <archeme...@mac.com> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 11:46:44 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Publishing royale to npm Just as an outsider: isn’t the whole point of royale to get rid of flash dependency? I’m eagerly waiting for the first full royale release to finally start converting my projects to html/js but the last thing I want is any dependency towards flash/swf. So I’m in favor of a jsonly package Dany > Op 30 okt. 2017, om 09:15 heeft OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > het volgende geschreven: > > I was wondering if we should publish the apache.royale-jsonly verson via > npm instead of the full version with swf support. > After all, users coming in vial npm would most likely not expect swf > support. > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > > Thanks, > Om
