Did you get an error or something else?
Did you try other options to see if they work?
-Alex
On 11/20/17, 1:38 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was not able to find the magic incantation to get —output_wrapper in
>the goog compiler to work.[1]
>
>I tried a couple of variations on this theme:
>-js-compiler-option='--output_wrapper (function(){%output%}());'
>
>I gave up and added the anonymous function wrapper using a
>post-processing script.
>
>Any suggestions on how to make this work?
>
>[1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FFAQ%23when-using-advanced-optimi
>zations-closure-compiler-adds-new-variables-to-the-global-scope-how-do-i-m
>ake-sure-my-variables-dont-collide-with-other-scripts-on-the-page&data=02%
>7C01%7C%7C829e19aade6b4897187208d52ffa6f7e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dec
>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636467675041585499&sdata=5UrePWNk1KrBdNE%2B8E0uCx4usW8Lrn4xC
>D4G%2BmaBMaw%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>om%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FFAQ%23when-using-advanced-optimiza
>tions-closure-compiler-adds-new-variables-to-the-global-scope-how-do-i-mak
>e-sure-my-variables-dont-collide-with-other-scripts-on-the-page&data=02%7C
>01%7C%7C829e19aade6b4897187208d52ffa6f7e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee
>1%7C0%7C0%7C636467675041585499&sdata=5UrePWNk1KrBdNE%2B8E0uCx4usW8Lrn4xCD4
>G%2BmaBMaw%3D&reserved=0>
