Hi,

I just pushed changes to the DataGrid and TreeGrid that should make things
work. I included upgrades to the DataGridExample and TreeExample.

Doing: <js:DataGrid className="DynamicDataGrid myAdditionalClass
DataGrid"> should work fine. You should include the "DataGrid" style so
that it picks up any missing default values.

The "DynamicDataGrid" style is part of defaults.css and combines beads
together to make it easier to use. You can, of course, add the beads
separately.

The examples also show how to style the cells.

I haven't been able to get the SWF and HTML versions to show styles the
same way. Mostly, they are missing on the SWF side, so I'll add that to my
list of things to look into. But you should have greater control on the
HTML side.

—peter

On 1/17/18, 4:17 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Well if the Above example of usage is not working, we need to figure out
>how to have it working. I can of course copy everything what is inside
>DynamicDataGrid style and add my things, but this is not the solution.
>
>Thanks!
>
>2018-01-17 22:10 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <p...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> I'm not sure; it is a good question. I will have to experiment.
>>
>> The DataGridModel works with ArrayList now. What I would do is change it
>> to work with Array and then make a new model for the ArrayList or
>> ICollectionView, which to me, is a better choice over ArrayList since
>>its
>> an interface and more adaptable.
>>
>>
>> ‹peter
>>
>> On 1/17/18, 4:07 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Peter,
>> >
>> >To me it is a good change. I was always wondering why DG is working
>>with
>> >ArrayList default. However let's say that I wanted to switch some of
>>the
>> >beads for that DataGrid or add some custom class. How am I supposed to
>>add
>> >second css class ?
>> >
>> >If I have this: <js:DataGrid className="DynamicDataGrid"> and I have
>> >something in my css file .myAdditionalClass {  }. Will it work ?
>> >
>> ><js:DataGrid className="DynamicDataGrid myAdditionalClass">
>> >
>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >
>> >2018-01-17 20:58 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >
>> >> IMO, the DataGrid in Basic should work with Arrays and a different
>>set
>> >>of
>> >> beads allow it to work with ArrayList and another set of beads
>>provides
>> >> detection of changes to the ArrayList.  As long as we have those
>>beads
>> >> (and maybe some tests/examples to prove it all works), the default
>>set
>> >>of
>> >> beads is less important. That decision should be driven by users and
>> >>maybe
>> >> by us if there is some other goal we want to hit (like making an
>>example
>> >> be smaller than some number of bytes.
>> >>
>> >> If you are going to create a style definition of DynamicDataGrid
>>should
>> >> also create a DynamicDataGrid class that packs in the required set of
>> >> beads.
>> >>
>> >> The DataGrid in Express will likely evolve to pack a set of beads
>>that
>> >> don't care if the data provider is an Array or ArrayList.  For now it
>> >>can
>> >> just assume ArrayList.
>> >>
>> >> My 2 cents,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 1/17/18, 11:43 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >I'm proposing a change to DataGrid default configuration. Right now
>> >> >DataGrid is designed to work with ArrayList; its does not work with
>> >> >Array. I propose that the default configuration for DataGrid is to
>>use
>> >> >Array as its dataProvider and provide no dynamic abilities.
>> >> >
>> >> >We would include in the defaults.css a style definition,
>> >> >DynamicDataGrid, which would set up DataGrid to use the more dynamic
>> >> >ICollectionView set of beads. When items were added or removed from
>>the
>> >> >dataProvider, the grid would automatically reflect the change.
>> >> >
>> >> >Doing this would provide a better PAYG experience. Or do you think
>> >> >DataGrid is too advanced to bother with Array at all?
>> >> >
>> >> ><js:DataGrid> would require its dataProvider be an Array.
>> >> ><js:DataGrid className="DynamicDataGrid"> would require its
>> >>dataProvider
>> >> >be ArrayList (or any thing that implements ICollectionView).
>> >> >
>> >> >What do you think? Should DataGrid's default configuration work with
>> >> >Array and then use PAYG to upgrade it to more dynamic components if
>> >> >that's what the developer wants?
>> >> >
>> >> >One more thing: the List's default configuration uses Array and you
>> >>have
>> >> >to add dynamic beads if you want it to respond to changes. I would
>>also
>> >> >add a "DynamicList" style to make it easier to do that. This way
>>there
>> >>is
>> >> >consistency between List and DataGrid.
>> >> >
>> >> ><js:List> would require its dataProvider to be an Array.
>> >> ><js:List className="DynamicList"> would require its dataProvider to
>>be
>> >> >ArrayList (or any thing that implements ICollectionView).
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Peter
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Cpent%40adobe.com%
>> 7C0e49839e7e584159
>> >267908d55dee5e4d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518200725
>> >558336&sdata=VsmG4W6WXx5v2%2Blfa3s9ieXuVsjCv%
>> 2BRWa84LNf6W11M%3D&reserved=0
>> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Cpent%40adobe.com%
>> 7C0e49839e7e584159
>> >267908d55dee5e4d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518200725
>> >558336&sdata=VsmG4W6WXx5v2%2Blfa3s9ieXuVsjCv%
>> 2BRWa84LNf6W11M%3D&reserved=0
>> >>*
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Cpent%40adobe.com%7C10d8bd7f1c8142fd
>99c408d55defbba8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518206583
>734743&sdata=jnmNjh97hWUKYWkBL26vtw9jLeUeF%2F2rXb9FNSBFWVs%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Cpent%40adobe.com%7C10d8bd7f1c8142fd
>99c408d55defbba8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636518206583
>734743&sdata=jnmNjh97hWUKYWkBL26vtw9jLeUeF%2F2rXb9FNSBFWVs%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply via email to