Just tried AMF in Edge and IE11 and both works as well :) 2018-05-16 16:13 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>:
> Hi Piotr, > > finaly Safari works ok as well, I was checked some development tools and > seems that was interfering, so for now works great in all 3 browsers (still > need to test on Windows IE11 and Edge), so not need to fill any bug for now > ;) > > About the place where you run the client, right, you need to put on the > same server and serve it thought the same url, if not you can use developer > tools to remove restrictions. > > > > > 2018-05-16 15:49 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > >> Carlos, >> >> Last time when I was testing AMF PHP it was working fine on my sight. I >> had >> to just push application in the same place as AMF server. I didn't test it >> in Safari. >> >> Great to hear that! Congrats! >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> 2018-05-16 15:46 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: >> >> > Piotr, >> > >> > I finally get total communication with my Backend!! :D >> > >> > The problem is localized in Safari. I was testing all the time with >> Safari, >> > and then I tried with Chrome and it worked. I tried with Firefox as well >> > and worked as well. >> > So we have some bug that generates some problem in deserialization in >> > Safari. I still didn't try in IE11 and Edge. >> > >> > The problem with PHP: What was? maybe was done from Safari? >> > >> > I think that bug will be hard to discover since is something related to >> the >> > concrete implementation of Safari >> > >> > >> > 2018-05-16 12:17 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: >> > >> > > Hi Piotr, >> > > >> > > right! I think we still have something wrong. Let me explain: I'm >> right >> > > now trying to make a first communication with our company app. >> > > I get to communicate from Royale to Java sending a populate type >> object, >> > > but I'm still don't get the response ok, I'm getting a "Failed >> decoding >> > the >> > > response". The object coming is very complex, but I think all the >> pieces >> > > coming in that object are currently working. So I'm trying to >> understand >> > > what's failing. So while the example works with something similar, in >> my >> > > current app still don't have it. I must say we have many other things >> in >> > > the mix like security filters and had to remove a especial handling of >> > > RemoteObjects we have in place to start from a minimal scenario. >> > > >> > > Maybe if you try with PHP, you'll find some problem. I think we are >> > mostly >> > > done, and maybe the problem is not in Royale but in how configuration >> is >> > > done in our respective projects. >> > > >> > > Good luck with your experiment! :) >> > > >> > > Carlos >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 2018-05-16 12:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >: >> > > >> > >> Hi Carlos, >> > >> >> > >> I'm wondering now what should be on the AMF PHP sight to have it >> > working. >> > >> Maybe I will try to find some time to investigate it. Since on Java >> > >> HashSet >> > >> is ok, maybe on PHP sight there is something which can accept >> ArrayList. >> > >> ;) >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, Piotr >> > >> >> > >> 2018-05-16 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: >> > >> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > just let you know that I tried to retrieve a Collection from Java >> with >> > >> > RemoteObject/AMF, and that worked without problem. I updated the >> > example >> > >> > with this test that compose a java.util.Set (a HashSet), send it >> and >> > we >> > >> get >> > >> > it in Royale as a royale ArrayList. >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm a bit surprised that this works without much problem. Still >> don't >> > >> try >> > >> > (know) if sending ArrayList from Royale to the backend will work. >> > Maybe >> > >> > BlazeDS expect to find an ArrayCollection, and will find an >> > ArrayList... >> > >> > >> > >> > So far so good. I completed the example as well with some more >> > >> combinations >> > >> > (nesting typed objects in a typed object, nesting an array of >> > >> objects,...). >> > >> > >> > >> > As well fix a problem in Reflection adding a Try-Catch, that make >> > >> object in >> > >> > both layers need to have exactly the same number of properties. >> Now, >> > the >> > >> > as3 layer can have less properties. This is something widely use in >> > >> Flex. >> > >> > >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Carlos Rovira >> > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> >> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Carlos Rovira >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Rovira >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
