A couple of questions/comments: > On May 18, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > One more important technical thing about that way is "verbosity" since each > time you reference that kind of class you are introducing a name that use > to be 2-3 time longer, each time.
Are you suggesting this has performance implications? I would not have thought that class name length effects performance. If you have a source that it does, I’d be interested in hearing details. > "My suggestion with meta-data was a way to enable the second option. It > does not need to be specifically meta-tags. It could be something like this > as well: > > /** > * royaleclassselector RadioButton > * royaleclassprefix basic > * royaleinheritsbaseselector > */ > " > I still prefers the [] format since is more concise and I think is more > suited for this particular purpose. I agree that the bracketed format is “prettier”, but I could live with either. > In General, I think we should get something that will be the "default" way, > and then if we have a metadata, that should override the default way. That > will make possible the most flexible way of handling this an a solution > that since to fit all visions. Agreed. I was suggesting that the default remains as it is today, and we be careful about including metadata in Framework classes. Thanks, Harbs
