Hi, for example latest view state example in js-release is:
index.html - 2kb .js - 110kb .css - 16kb so 128kb -> gzip - 33kb (and js.map - 293 kb -> this file I assume is not needed right? what's the purpose? If I remove it the app works the same) This is using some layouts, Button, TextInput, Card ,view states and beads, so very good right? ;) 2018-06-05 19:01 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > I just compiled HelloWorld. It is 79K. That's bigger than it used to > be. In looking at the js-debug version, there are some .js files from the > framework that might be eliminated if we want to take the time. > > It is nice to know that we can create small apps, although I'm wondering > if it is a fair comparison. The other frameworks generally have fancier UI > widgets with more elements in the DOM and more CSS to make it look great. > Jewel is providing those same fancier UI widgets and it also will come at > some cost. > > My 2 cents, > -Alex > > On 6/5/18, 6:57 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure. > > For kicks, I looked at three other non-trivial apps I have.They all > have a whole pile of components in use and lots of business logic. > > Gzipped, they weigh in at: 91KB, 100KB and 117KB respectively. > > Even the biggest one is still less than some of the frameworks alone. > > Harbs > > > On Jun 5, 2018, at 3:10 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > But, you version is only with a part of Royale, if you put a button, > will > > grow, if put a TextInput, will grow and so > > I think the comparison should be with almost all code involved > right? I > > don't think the rest of frameworks listed there will be showing > parts, but > > the whole library. > > > > 2018-06-05 13:48 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: > > > >> FYI, application size stacks up very nicely when compared to other > >> frameworks: > >> > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2FRestuta%2Fcda69e50a853aa64912d&data= > 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata= > INLNGTTuYDwM%2FRtYV8LQ4pY5S4%2FOdmOs6JWzsYxAQZA%3D&reserved=0 < > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2FRestuta%2Fcda69e50a853aa64912d&data= > 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata= > INLNGTTuYDwM%2FRtYV8LQ4pY5S4%2FOdmOs6JWzsYxAQZA%3D&reserved=0> < > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2FRestuta%2Fcda69e50a853aa64912d&data= > 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata= > INLNGTTuYDwM%2FRtYV8LQ4pY5S4%2FOdmOs6JWzsYxAQZA%3D&reserved=0 < > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2FRestuta%2Fcda69e50a853aa64912d&data= > 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata= > INLNGTTuYDwM%2FRtYV8LQ4pY5S4%2FOdmOs6JWzsYxAQZA%3D&reserved=0>> > >> > >> 24KB gzipped *with all application logic* is right in there with the > >> smallest frameworks *sans the actual application*! > >> > >>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 2:38 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Congrats Harbs! :) > >>> > >>> as I just responded to Alex, I hope to give a try to all this soon > as I > >> get > >>> finish some work I have in my hands right now. Maybe in one or two > days > >>> from now. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Carlos > >>> > >>> > >>> 2018-06-04 15:48 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> FYI, I just compiled a bare-bones app, and a Basic app with a > View, > >>>> VContainer and Label is 85KB uncompressed. 24KB gzipped. It looks > like > >>>> there’s no extra classes. > >>>> > >>>> The CSS is 546 bytes and 222 bytes gzipped. There’s no extra css > either, > >>>> although som empty selectors could use some cleanup. > >>>> > >>>> Harbs > >>>> > >>>>> On Jun 4, 2018, at 4:27 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The only class selectors left in Basic defaults.css is: > >>>>> > >>>>> .Application *, .royale *, . royale *:before, . royale *:after { > >>>>> -moz-box-sizing: border-box; > >>>>> -webkit-box-sizing: border-box; > >>>>> box-sizing: border-box; > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>>>> I’m not sure how to best get rid of this. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> Harbs > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata=EzFOoWovI% > 2BOluTHQodvEWUTNfaJgRYEaQJX1BnAkN9k%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata=EzFOoWovI% > 2BOluTHQodvEWUTNfaJgRYEaQJX1BnAkN9k%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks. > protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% > 2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C684ff80e7444490aac1708d5caec404f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636638038403206781&sdata=EzFOoWovI% > 2BOluTHQodvEWUTNfaJgRYEaQJX1BnAkN9k%3D&reserved=0> > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
