Great Piotr!,

as you said discussion is not over, but I think we discussed almost lots of
things and plans was left for releases "post 0.9.3". In fact I revert
package name changes that was the only point that was making us not release
0.9.3. So I think we are at this point safe to release 0.9.3, 0.9.4 or what
we want to call it :)

I must say that I'm this days wanting to finish some things in Jewel that
will make it pretty usable in an stable way, for me that points are:

* End Jewel Table and Jewel List remove and update data
* Jewel NumericStepper
* Jewel DropdownList/Combobox

There's much more to do, but I think those three points will make many
people have the minimun to start working in real Apache Royale Jewel apps
(at least is what I need to start a real project we have now for Apache
Royale, so I'm working hard to complete these points).
I want to make this asap, so hope something of those point could go in this
release :)

Best,

Carlos








El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, Piotr Zarzycki (<piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
escribió:

> Hi Om,
>
> I have no objections to that. The question whether from the technical point
> of view Maven which is I believe big part of release process won't
> complain. We will see.
>
> Thanks for confirmation,
> Piotr
>
>
> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Yes, since 0.9.3 was already pushed out via npm [1], it would be best if
> we
> > skip to 0.9.4
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > [1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > It's been a while since last version of Royale was released. I would
> like
> > > to start process of releasing current version no matter in what state
> it
> > is
> > > right now. I know that we have probably unfinished discussion about
> some
> > > core changes. I'm suggesting leave it for the next release. I'm
> volunteer
> > > to be release manager. I will study carefully what we have here [1]
> and I
> > > hope to get help with all of the issues.
> > >
> > > I see that we have failing typedefs - I cleaned up workspace and run
> > build
> > > again. If #576 fail I will ask infra for advice. [2]
> > >
> > > Om,
> > >
> > > Do I need to know anything in case of release Royale to npm ? Your last
> > > suggestion here [3] is still up ?
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > What about emulation branch - Can I merge it into develop ?
> > >
> > > Is there anything what can hold that release ?
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
> > > [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/royale-typedefs/
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to