OK.  But by specifying setting-template you are giving it different startup 
property values.  IMO, best test is to run the same thing on your command line 
that Ant is trying to run.

-Alex

On 9/14/18, 9:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Alex,
    
    You understand it me wrong. I don't skip tests when I'm trying to create
    release candidate. This command is test command - I run it just to check
    what pure Maven build download for me - not connected with ant at all.
    
    Thanks,
    Piotr
    
    pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a):
    
    > Ant does not specify to use settings-template.  I never specify that
    > anymore when running Maven from the command-line.
    >
    > FWIW, I think you should not skip tests or rat when trying to create a
    > release candidate.
    >
    > Ant uses a "mvn" variable when trying to launch Maven so you can
    > -Dmvn=<some other path> although I don't think you can add other options 
to
    > that variable.
    >
    > I guess I will try this out myself on Windows.
    >
    > HTH
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 9/14/18, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     For the tests I run in command line following: mvn -s
    > settings-template.xml
    >     -DskipTests -Drat.skip=true clean install - It uses my Apache Maven
    > 3.5.4.
    >     I would be surprised that Ant run some other Maven - I don't have any
    > other
    >     installed in my system. I will check as you propose from Ant.
    >
    >
    >     pt., 14 wrz 2018 o 17:54 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    > napisał(a):
    >
    >     > The Ant script runs (on Windows) whatever mvn.cmd maps to in the
    > PATH.
    >     > What are you typing on the command-line to run Maven?
    >     >
    >     > There are some options for Ant that print out more info or you might
    > add
    >     > some other commands to the Ant script to help figure out what
    > mvn.cmd it is
    >     > running.  On Windows, I think you can run "where mvn.cmd" to see
    > what it is
    >     > picking up.
    >     >
    >     > HTH,
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > On 9/14/18, 8:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     I have spent on that again a bunch of time and something is
    > really
    >     > weird
    >     >     happen. I've figure out that if Maven is using scm and we won't
    > specify
    >     >     inside pluginManagement tag what version of scm is used - It 
will
    >     > download
    >     >     some older one.
    >     >
    >     >     However there is something wrong on the line between
    >     > releasecandidate.xml
    >     >     and Maven.
    >     >
    >     >     1) If I run build of royale-compiler using cmd or even from
    > Intellij -
    >     > scm
    >     >     1.10.0 is being downloaded - correct one.
    >     >     2) If I run release process using releasecandidate.xml there is
    > being
    >     >     downloaded 1.9.4
    >     >
    >     >     Any idea why it could happen like that ? This file
    >     > releasecandidate.xml is
    >     >     used to just launch Maven build, why old scm is being
    > downloaded?!
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     Piotr
    >     >
    >     >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 21:43 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     > napisał(a):
    >     >
    >     >     > I think the console output will show what versions of plugins
    > are
    >     >     > downloaded. You can also check out the local maven cache.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Get Outlook for Android<
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179839019&amp;sdata=xfVsaLBX3D85Nbi%2FGQPkqzFiIICAClDFmEKGOG3AEOw%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > ________________________________
    >     >     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 11:02:29 AM
    >     >     > To: dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >     > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Unfortunately I don't know how to check that. I can check only
    >     > "Effective
    >     >     > Pom" - Intellij is able to show me what is behind the stage in
    >     > specific
    >     >     > pom. This is how it looks like for main pom in royale-asjs ->
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FeVmK&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=TyZ6Ft64xY78qWgkUbIGScF8hl6Uq8IQhcEavb3HYYQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Piotr
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 19:42 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    > >
    >     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >
    >     >     > > Is maven using scm 1.10?
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > Get Outlook for Android<
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=YBSzLhAaoNfPH4WQPFn4xZ6t0cZ0oVXvYAmHWW23xhE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > ________________________________
    >     >     > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:55:29 AM
    >     >     > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >     > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > I'm unable to use releasecandidate.xml and prepare that
    > release
    >     > using
    >     >     > that
    >     >     > > script. It's failing constantly, despite my attempt of
    > update scm.
    >     >     > Failing
    >     >     > > is happen only on royale-asjs.
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > I see only option to prepare that release manually.
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > Thanks,
    >     >     > > Piotr
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 10:47 Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > > napisał(a):
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > > Yes, that might work.  But you also have to run the
    >     > update.version
    >     >     > target
    >     >     > > > in Ant.  It looks like I didn't write about it in the
    > wiki.  I
    >     > think
    >     >     > the
    >     >     > > > command would be something like:
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >   Ant -f releasecandidate.xml update.version
    >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.3
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > > I think it will ask you for the next version to use.  I'm
    > done
    >     > working
    >     >     > > for
    >     >     > > > today, so good luck.
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > > HTH,
    >     >     > > > -Alex
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > > On 9/13/18, 12:52 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > wrote:
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     Alex,
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     By that do you mean that I basically should go two
    > times
    >     > with third
    >     >     > > > step of
    >     >     > > >     your release steps ? It will give the results I think
    > so.
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     [1]
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes%23release-steps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=OBlE8DGywejm8vUenIZgOvO5rbX%2Bf4%2FnBXaD6n%2BFNkE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     Piotr
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     czw., 13 wrz 2018 o 09:46 Alex Harui
    >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > > > napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > > >     > I also noticed that there are lots of references to
    > 0.9.3
    >     > in the
    >     >     > > > repo.  If
    >     >     > > >     > we want to use 0.9.4 as the version number, I think
    > you
    >     > will have
    >     >     > > to
    >     >     > > > run
    >     >     > > >     > the update.version target in releasecandidate.xml 
and
    >     > update the
    >     >     > > > Maven poms
    >     >     > > >     > as well.   We've never really tried to skip a 
version
    >     > number
    >     >     > > before,
    >     >     > > > so not
    >     >     > > >     > exactly sure what needs to be done.  One way that
    > might
    >     > work to
    >     >     > > > update
    >     >     > > >     > Maven poms is to create the release branches.  That
    > should
    >     > update
    >     >     > > the
    >     >     > > >     > version numbers in the develop branch.  Then toss 
the
    >     > release
    >     >     > > branch
    >     >     > > >     > without reverting and create another release
    > branch.  That
    >     > should
    >     >     > > > update
    >     >     > > >     > the version numbers in develop to 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT
    > which is
    >     > what we
    >     >     > > > want, and
    >     >     > > >     > the release branches should have 0.9.4.
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     > HTH,
    >     >     > > >     > -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     > On 9/12/18, 2:18 PM, "Alex Harui"
    > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
    >     > >
    >     >     > > wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     The console output should include what version 
of
    >     > plugins are
    >     >     > > >     > downloaded.
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     Get Outlook for Android<
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=YBSzLhAaoNfPH4WQPFn4xZ6t0cZ0oVXvYAmHWW23xhE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >     > >
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     ________________________________
    >     >     > > >     >     From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 9:54:04 AM
    >     >     > > >     >     To: dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >     > > >     >     Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process
    > 0.9.3
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     That's not good, because I was updated that
    > stuff. It
    >     > looks
    >     >     > > like
    >     >     > > > it
    >     >     > > >     > didn't
    >     >     > > >     >     work well. Let me investigate more scm plugin
    > stuff
    >     > and I'm
    >     >     > > > reverting
    >     >     > > >     >     current changes.
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     Thanks!
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 18:39 Alex Harui
    >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     > >
    >     >     > > >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     > That error implies that maven-scm 1.10.0 is 
not
    >     > being used.
    >     >     > > > Some
    >     >     > > >     > older
    >     >     > > >     >     > version is.  I couldn't figure out from 
reading
    >     > Maven doc
    >     >     > > > exactly
    >     >     > > >     > how to
    >     >     > > >     >     > control that.  We might need to specify it in
    > the
    >     > main pom,
    >     >     > > > but I was
    >     >     > > >     >     > hoping that if you used the latest Maven it
    > would
    >     >     > > automatically
    >     >     > > >     > bring in
    >     >     > > >     >     > that version.
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     > Regarding canceling an RC:  the Ant scripts
    > have
    >     > targets
    >     >     > that
    >     >     > > > run
    >     >     > > >     > other
    >     >     > > >     >     > targets that have bunches of Ant commands.  So
    > when
    >     >     > something
    >     >     > > > fails,
    >     >     > > >     > and
    >     >     > > >     >     > you re-start from some Ant target, it is
    > expecting
    >     > certain
    >     >     > > > starting
    >     >     > > >     >     > conditions.  So sometimes you have to revert
    > commits
    >     > or
    >     >     > > delete
    >     >     > > > the
    >     >     > > >     > branch
    >     >     > > >     >     > and tags or sometimes you just delete the
    > working
    >     > copy.  It
    >     >     > > > depends
    >     >     > > >     > where
    >     >     > > >     >     > you are starting from.  There are some Ant
    > tasks
    >     > that start
    >     >     > > at
    >     >     > > >     > certain
    >     >     > > >     >     > points (like after royale-compiler and
    >     > royale-typedefs have
    >     >     > > > been
    >     >     > > >     > completed)
    >     >     > > >     >     > but it isn't so fine grain that you can start
    >     > exactly from
    >     >     > > the
    >     >     > > > point
    >     >     > > >     > of
    >     >     > > >     >     > failure.
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     > HTH,
    >     >     > > >     >     > -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     > On 9/12/18, 8:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     >     > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     > wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     I got fail on royale-asjs repo ->
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FBzVx&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=JxR%2FX%2B98sBFuVQ6YCB1GShLcXW2NriD5IntcaZMr9E8%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     I don't understand one thing from the
    >     > instruction.
    >     >     > Since
    >     >     > > >     > something
    >     >     > > >     >     > failed
    >     >     > > >     >     >     during branch creation I need to revert
    > changes.
    >     >     > Probably
    >     >     > > > remove
    >     >     > > >     >     > branches
    >     >     > > >     >     >     and revert everything in develop. - Yes ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     Instruction is saying in Canceling RC: "To
    >     > cancel an RC
    >     >     > > and
    >     >     > > >     > generate a
    >     >     > > >     >     > new
    >     >     > > >     >     >     RC, you have to revert certain changes 
that
    >     > Maven made
    >     >     > to
    >     >     > > > the
    >     >     > > >     > release
    >     >     > > >     >     >     branch." - Why only release branch ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     Should I not remove release branch ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 17:38 Piotr Zarzycki <
    >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     > I just tried it from Git Bash and
    > something
    >     > started
    >     >     > to
    >     >     > > > work :)
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     > śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 17:36 Piotr Zarzycki 
<
    >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >> I just go through SSH instruction again
    > and
    >     > re-added
    >     >     > > > rsa key
    >     >     > > >     > to
    >     >     > > >     >     > GitHub,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >> but no luck so far.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >> śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 17:36 Piotr Zarzycki
    > <
    >     >     > > >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> Yes - I have exactly two files there -
    > the
    >     > same as
    >     >     > > you.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 17:34 Alex Harui
    >     >     > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     > > >     > >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>> napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Are you running releasecandidate.xml
    > from an
    >     >     > 'empty
    >     >     > > > folder
    >     >     > > >     > and
    >     >     > > >     >     > not in
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> your working copy?  I think the only
    > thing
    >     > I have
    >     >     > in
    >     >     > > > the
    >     >     > > >     > folder is
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> releasecandidate.xml and
    > local.properties.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Get Outlook for Android<
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=YBSzLhAaoNfPH4WQPFn4xZ6t0cZ0oVXvYAmHWW23xhE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >     >     > >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> ________________________________
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> From: Piotr Zarzycki <
    >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018
    > 7:42:06
    >     > AM
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release
    >     > process 0.9.3
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Yes I follow the SSH link. I will
    > review
    >     > stuff
    >     >     > > again.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 4:06 PM Alex
    > Harui
    >     >     > > >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     > > >     >     > >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > Did you follow the SSH link from
    > here?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=szVfEwjxHyCPtryfP6CmFf9rL2aLCOUbRqV606gjW9g%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > HTH,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > On 9/12/18, 4:55 AM, "Piotr
    > Zarzycki" <
    >     >     > > >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     I got first fail using
    >     > releasecandidate.xml
    >     >     > > > script
    >     >     > > >     > [1]. It
    >     >     > > >     >     > is fail
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > during
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     git push, so I thought that I
    > will
    >     > try to
    >     >     > run
    >     >     > > > that
    >     >     > > >     > command
    >     >     > > >     >     > which
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> seems
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > to
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     be cause of the problem
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     git push g...@github.com:
    >     >     > > > apache/royale-compiler.git
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >  refs/heads/develop:refs/heads/develop
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     but with fetch
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     git fetch "g...@github.com:
    >     >     > > > apache/royale-compiler.git"
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >  refs/heads/develop:refs/heads/develop
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     Enter passphrase for key
    >     >     > > > '/c/Users/piotr/.ssh/id_rsa':
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     fatal: Refusing to fetch into
    > current
    >     > branch
    >     >     > > >     >     > refs/heads/develop of
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > non-bare
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     repository
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     Anyone have problems like that
    > during
    >     >     > release
    >     >     > > > process
    >     >     > > >     > ? I
    >     >     > > >     >     > do have
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> SSH
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > keys
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     added to my manager and GitHub
    >     > account.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     [1]
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     >     > >
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fuyba&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=pUDCYN6vofhYS3GMWi6wvXpJ%2Fweg6qdJFuAj1Q0zgeo%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 11:36 Piotr
    >     > Zarzycki <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > Hi Harbs,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > What's your progress on
    > fixing that
    >     > or
    >     >     > > > eventually
    >     >     > > >     > moving
    >     >     > > >     >     > to
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> branch ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > Can I
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > proceed with stuff ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     > śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 07:33 Alex
    > Harui
    >     >     > > >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> Speaking of upgrading, I
    > think you
    >     > will
    >     >     > > need
    >     >     > > > to
    >     >     > > >     > use the
    >     >     > > >     >     > latest
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > maven or
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> somehow get Maven to use
    > version
    >     > 1.10.0
    >     >     > of
    >     >     > > > the
    >     >     > > >     > Maven SCM
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Plugin.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> I have most recently tweaked
    > the
    >     > Ant
    >     >     > > scripts
    >     >     > > > to
    >     >     > > >     > generate
    >     >     > > >     >     > the
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > required
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> file extension on the SHA
    > hashes.
    >     >     > Assuming
    >     >     > > > those
    >     >     > > >     > changes
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> work, we
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > should
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> be good to go.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> Good luck,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> On 9/11/18, 12:28 PM, "Piotr
    >     > Zarzycki" <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     In case of upgrading
    > anything I
    >     >     > really
    >     >     > > > suggest
    >     >     > > >     > to
    >     >     > > >     >     > leave it
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> for
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > the
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> next
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     release. If you upgrade
    >     > something you
    >     >     > > > have to
    >     >     > > >     > take
    >     >     > > >     >     > care of
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > upgrading
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     maven's pom as well.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     On Tue, Sep 11, 2018,
    > 8:54 PM
    >     > Alex
    >     >     > > Harui
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > I am still trying to
    > fix the
    >     > Maven
    >     >     > > > build of
    >     >     > > >     > the
    >     >     > > >     >     > examples.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > Harb's
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> change
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > seems satisfactory for
    > at
    >     > least
    >     >     > now.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > On 9/11/18, 11:47 AM,
    >     > "Harbs" <
    >     >     > > >     >     > harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     It should be good
    > to go
    >     > now
    >     >     > > unless
    >     >     > > > Alex
    >     >     > > >     > or
    >     >     > > >     >     > someone
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> else
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > has
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> objections…
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     > On Sep 11, 2018,
    > at
    >     > 8:55 PM,
    >     >     > > > Piotr
    >     >     > > >     > Zarzycki <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     > No problem.
    > Thank you!
    >     > If I
    >     >     > > start
    >     >     > > >     > anything
    >     >     > > >     >     > with
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> release
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > that
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> would be
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     > tomorrow morning
    > or
    >     > evening
    >     >     > my
    >     >     > > > time.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     > Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     > wt., 11 wrz 2018
    > o
    >     > 19:54
    >     >     > Harbs
    >     >     > > <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> I’m going to
    > spend a
    >     > few
    >     >     > > > minutes now
    >     >     > > >     > to see
    >     >     > > >     >     > if I
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> can
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > resolve
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> this
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > simply.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> If not, I’ll
    > revert.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> Harbs
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> On Sep 11,
    > 2018, at
    >     > 8:50
    >     >     > PM,
    >     >     > > > Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     > Zarzycki <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> Hi Harbs,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> It would be
    > great if
    >     > you
    >     >     > > could
    >     >     > > > do
    >     >     > > >     > that.
    >     >     > > >     >     > You could
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > bring back
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > changes
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> again
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> after release
    > and
    >     > discuss
    >     >     > > > whatever
    >     >     > > >     > needed.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> I think we are
    > using
    >     >     > > following
    >     >     > > >     > version from
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> 20170626.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>> wt., 11 wrz
    > 2018 o
    >     > 19:39
    >     >     > > Harbs
    >     >     > > > <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> I can revert
    > the
    >     > changes
    >     >     > if
    >     >     > > > that’s
    >     >     > > >     > what
    >     >     > > >     >     > folks
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> want.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > We’re
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> going
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > to have
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> trace calls
    > output
    >     > if I do
    >     >     > > > that,
    >     >     > > >     > but we
    >     >     > > >     >     > can
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> resolve
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > that
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> for the
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > next
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> release.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> I’m going to
    > see if
    >     > a
    >     >     > > > different
    >     >     > > >     > version
    >     >     > > >     >     > of the
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > closure
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> compiler
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > plays
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> better. The
    > latest
    >     > version
    >     >     > > > throws a
    >     >     > > >     >     > NoSuchMethod
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > error on
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >
    >     >     > > >     >     >
    >     >     > > >
    >     > 
com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> Anyone know
    > which
    >     > version
    >     >     > > > we’re
    >     >     > > >     > using now?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>> On Sep 11,
    > 2018,
    >     > at 9:09
    >     >     > > AM,
    >     >     > > > Carlos
    >     >     > > >     >     > Rovira <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    > carlosrov...@apache.org>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>> I think is
    > better
    >     > move
    >     >     > that
    >     >     > > >     > changes to a
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> branch and
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> release.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>> thanks
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>> El lun., 10
    > sept.
    >     > 2018 a
    >     >     > > las
    >     >     > > >     > 20:59, Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> Zarzycki
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > (<
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>
    >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
    >     >     > > >)
    >     >     > > >     > escribió:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> Harbs,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> Can you
    > comment
    >     > on that
    >     >     > ?
    >     >     > > > Any
    >     >     > > >     > chance to
    >     >     > > >     >     > move
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> that
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> changes to
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > branch ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> pon., 10
    > wrz 2018
    >     > o
    >     >     > 20:54
    >     >     > > > Alex
    >     >     > > >     > Harui
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> Yes.  I
    > think we
    >     > are
    >     >     > > using
    >     >     > > > the
    >     >     > > >     > wrong
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> annotation
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > for
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> variable
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > number
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >> of
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> 
parameters.
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> -Alex
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> On 
9/10/18,
    >     > 11:49 AM,
    >     >     > > > "Piotr
    >     >     > > >     > Zarzycki"
    >     >     > > >     >     > <
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>> wrote:
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>  Alex,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>  What
    > trace hack
    >     > are
    >     >     > you
    >     >     > > >     > referring to
    >     >     > > >     >     > ? This
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> is
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> > related
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> what
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > Harbs
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> commits ?
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>  Thanks,
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>  Piotr
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>  pon., 10
    > wrz
    >     > 2018 o
    >     >     > > 20:47
    >     >     > > > Alex
    >     >     > > >     > Harui
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     > >
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>> 
napisał(a):
    >     >     > > >     >     >     >>>> >     >>     >     >>>>>>>
    >
    
    
    -- 
    
    Piotr Zarzycki
    
    Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179849029&amp;sdata=jhxI%2BEEGDzgT3DH6IlkAAOXy3yMBJbTPguCMwpguZ3E%3D&amp;reserved=0
    
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce7d71e7fef09469b292908d61a5d0675%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636725384179859029&amp;sdata=wlFor%2Feke%2FAmPYsi6NALr9dEZV7wOwtdVyg05EHh8A0%3D&amp;reserved=0>*
    

Reply via email to