What does 'git status' return for that local copy of the royale-compiler repo?
That part of the script is trying to see if compiler-jburg-types and
compiler-build-tools needed a version update that needs to be pushed. Those
two projects should be at 1.0.0 since we rarely, if ever, will need to modify
it. There shouldn't have been modifications in this release, yet Git status is
reporting modifications to some file. A test is done to check for the word
"modified:" in the 'git status' output, then that attempt to push is executed.
Somehow, the git status is implying modifications but the files we are trying
to push are not modified.
The solutions should not require reverting of the release branch. It looks
like you have successfully created a correct set of branches and the steps you
are running start by pulling down the release branch. I didn't see any commits
to the release branch from the scripts, so to re-start, it should just be
manually deleting the local copies of the repos and running the Ant command
again after making one of the changes to releasecandidate.xml I will describe
below:
IMO, the choices are (and there may be more choices)
1. Figure out how to be smarter about what 'git status' output will say so the
test works correctly
2. Set failonerror="false" on the push step and not care if that push succeeds.
This is slightly risky if we ever do want to push changes, but again, that is
low probability, IMO.
3. Comment out those steps since it will be rare we will need them. If we do
need them some day, the RM will have to remember to uncomment those steps.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/10/18, 2:52 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok It's failed :) However I passed step 3 in instruction. Step 4 is failing
[1] - if someone know what could it be - I will wait with reverting changes.
Lines in stacktrace are pointing in ant script to following targets:
Line 556: git-commit-and-push-utils
Line 487: git-commit-and-push-utils-if-modified
Line 473:
<exec executable="${git}" dir="${compiler}" failonerror="true" >
<arg value="commit" />
<arg value="-m" />
<arg value="remove SNAPSHOT from compiler-jburg-types and
compiler-build-tools versions" />
</exec>
[1]
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbg5e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265956444&sdata=2oMPXqd%2BFLqxtfvvT7S7x4rxdfg0wnDPdGq1zZFg0DE%3D&reserved=0
Thanks,
Piotr
śr., 10 paź 2018 o 11:34 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a):
> Ok Piotr, good luck! :)
>
> El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 10:34, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I will try right now process from my PC. We will see how far I will go
> with
> > that.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > czw., 4 paź 2018 o 22:01 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Om,
> > >
> > > If make_branches succeeds, then you shouldn't need to go back and
> delete
> > > branches and tags and run make_branches again if the "maven" step
> fails.
> > >
> > > You might need to revert any changes to the release branch that the
> > > "maven" step did, but then you should be able to delete the local copy
> of
> > > the branches and start again with "maven" or
> > > "maven_skip_compiler_and_typedefs" if you got all the way up to
> > royale-asjs.
> > >
> > > What are some of the 200+ files that don't get reverted back to 0.9.4?
> > >
> > > You are welcome to try to add the "continue" option. I would suggest
> > > adding a dummy parameter. So if the script currently calls Maven like
> > this:
> > >
> > > <exec executable="${mvn}"
dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
> > > failonerror="true" >
> > > <arg value="clean" />
> > > <arg value="install" />
> > > </exec>
> > >
> > > You can try changing it to something like this:
> > >
> > > <property name="continueOption" value="-Ddummy=0" />
> > > <exec executable="${mvn}"
dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
> > > failonerror="true" >
> > > <arg value="${continueOption}" />
> > > <arg value="clean" />
> > > <arg value="install" />
> > > </exec>
> > >
> > > Then you should be able to set in your local.properties:
> > >
> > > continueOption=-rf JewelExample
> > >
> > > You will probably need to use different names for each call to Maven
so
> > > subsequent Maven calls don't pick up the same option.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/4/18, 11:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:48 AM Alex Harui
<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Om, it looks like you are still deleting and recreating the
> > branches.
> > > > Does this mean you have never completed the make_branches step?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I delete the tags, branches (remote) each time something
> fails.
> > > Then
> > > I do a global search for 0.9.5 and replace it with 0.9.4 (some
200+
> > > files
> > > across 3 repos), then push them into remote/develop.
> > >
> > > Then I do the make_branches step first. Then do a git push in
> > > roayale-asjs
> > > as per the instructions in the commandline. I have never had
issues
> > > with
> > > this step. It is always the maven step that fails for some reason
> or
> > > the
> > > other.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Is make_branches failing trying to run a build in the develop
> > branch
> > > and
> > > > uploading 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT artifacts?
> > >
> > >
> > > No
> > >
> > >
> > > > I supposed we could try to find a way to skip that, but you will
> > need
> > > > reliable uploading to repository.a.o to be an RM without going
> > crazy.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, I use the same internet connection for personal and work
> related
> > > activities. I don't usually have issues with internet. Either we
> > are
> > > very
> > > unlucky here or we need a more reselient way to pick up things if
> we
> > > lose
> > > internet connectivity momentarily.
> > >
> > > It takes upwards of 90 minutes of uploading stuff. I dont do this
> > kind
> > > of
> > > uploading for my regular work, so that is probably I have never
hit
> > > this
> > > issue before.
> > >
> > > I still think that looking into the 'resume-from' directive in
> maven
> > is
> > > worthwhile.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 10/3/18, 2:11 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:02 PM Alex Harui
> > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anything deploy, or is that the first thing that is
> > > attempted to
> > > > > deploy? I found this article that might help:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.apigee.com%2Fquestions%2F50756%2Funable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265956444&sdata=YmCfICWXAlzKEBjT0%2FTq9u%2BOJSnd2btciYotsKxeQy4%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It deployed a lot of artifacts before hitting this error. I
> > > don't see
> > > > anything special with this artifact. So, I am guessing that
> it
> > > was a
> > > > momentary bad connection that caused this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I would be concerned about restarting from the middle of a
> > > Maven
> > > > call. I
> > > > > suppose you could try it, but what if it skipped an
> artifact?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The maven error message explicitly says this:
> > > >
> > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] After correcting the problems,
you
> > can
> > > > resume
> > > > the build with the command
> > > >
> > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf
> > > > :Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There should be Ant targets for starting only on
> royale-asjs
> > if
> > > > > royale-compiler and royale=typedefs worked ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > HTH,
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/3/18, 11:58 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Another suggestion I have is - can we do all the
pushes
> > to
> > > > remote after
> > > > > everything is done locally? That way, if something
> goes
> > > wrong
> > > > > halfway, we
> > > > > can just delete the royale-* dirs locally and rerun
the
> > > > > releasecandiate ant
> > > > > script?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not sure if this is an easy change?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Om
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:42 AM OmPrakash Muppirala <
> > > > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, I tried a couple of times and I have started
> > > getting
> > > > `SSL peer
> > > > > shut
> > > > > > down incorrectly errors`
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 16:04 min
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at:
> > > > 2018-10-03T11:38:49-07:00
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > > > >
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy
> > > > > (default-deploy)
> > > > > > on project
> Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme:
> > > Failed
> > > > to
> > > > > deploy
> > > > > > artifacts: Could not transfer artifact
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme:swc:0.9.4
> > > > > > from/to apache.releases.https (
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fservice%2Flocal%2Fstaging%2Fdeploy%2Fmaven2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265956444&sdata=qDCegzJP7%2B7%2FPt1bQPfCRd2wqYfaK6p5Z2JdNs1Gvk4%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > ):
> > > > > > Remote host closed connection during handshake: SSL
> > peer
> > > shut
> > > > down
> > > > > > incorrectly -> [Help 1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack
> trace
> > > of the
> > > > errors,
> > > > > > re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X
> > > switch to
> > > > enable
> > > > > > full debug logging.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information
about
> > the
> > > > errors and
> > > > > > possible solutions, please read the following
> articles:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265956444&sdata=ae4yTtpkvsGrUWhEUenzGgjYB6%2BRIablUL502AmoF7g%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] After correcting the
> > > problems, you
> > > > can
> > > > > resume
> > > > > > the build with the command
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf
> > > > > > :Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am guessing it is a bad internet connection. I am
> > > wondering
> > > > if we
> > > > > can
> > > > > > pass a -rf (resume from) option to the maven call
> from
> > > ant?
> > > > > Otherwise
> > > > > > doing all this from scratch everytime is a big pain.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Om
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:47 AM Alex Harui
> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Looks like it was a missing [
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> MXRoyale and SparkRoyale built for me.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> HTH,
> > > > > >> -Alex
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 10/3/18, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I reverted everything back to previous state.
I
> > > can give
> > > > it a
> > > > > shot
> > > > > >> tomorrow evening.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Om
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:41 AM Alex Harui
> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > It was in a releasable state. TourDeFlex was
> > > running
> > > > on it.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I'm trying to track down the change that
broke
> > it.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > -Alex
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On 10/3/18, 12:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > > > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > A bit more progress. Now we are failing
on
> > the
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > project:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time:
> 01:34
> > > min
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at:
> > > > > 2018-10-03T00:28:14-07:00
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to
> execute
> > > goal
> > > > > >> >
> > > > >
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-maven-plugin:0.9.4:compile-as
> > > > > >> > (default-compile-as) on project MXRoyale:
> > > There were
> > > > > errors
> > > > > >> during the
> > > > > >> > build. Got return code 3 -> [Help 1]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the
full
> > > stack
> > > > trace of
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> errors,
> > > > > >> > re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven
> > using
> > > the -X
> > > > > switch to
> > > > > >> enable
> > > > > >> > full
> > > > > >> > debug logging.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more
> > > information
> > > > about the
> > > > > >> errors and
> > > > > >> > possible solutions, please read the
> > following
> > > > articles:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265956444&sdata=ae4yTtpkvsGrUWhEUenzGgjYB6%2BRIablUL502AmoF7g%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] After
> correcting
> > > the
> > > > problems,
> > > > > you
> > > > > >> can
> > > > > >> > resume
> > > > > >> > the build with the command
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] mvn <goals>
> -rf
> > > > :MXRoyale
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Can we perhaps turn this project off? Is
> it
> > > in a
> > > > > releasable
> > > > > >> state?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:30 PM OmPrakash
> > > Muppirala <
> > > > > >> > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > I'm going to give this another shot in
a
> > > couple of
> > > > > hours,
> > > > > >> unless
> > > > > >> > there are
> > > > > >> > > any objections.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > Om
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018, 2:04 PM Alex Harui
> > > > > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> Jewel is mentioned in there. I added
> > > mention of
> > > > the
> > > > > >> migration
> > > > > >> > components
> > > > > >> > >> and tour de flex. Not sure if I got
> the
> > > > formatting
> > > > > right.
> > > > > >> I think
> > > > > >> > it is
> > > > > >> > >> good enough.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> -Alex
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> On 10/1/18, 12:13 PM, "OmPrakash
> > > Muppirala" <
> > > > > >> bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> I updated it, although it looks a
> bit
> > > sparse
> > > > now.
> > > > > Can
> > > > > >> we list
> > > > > >> > a few
> > > > > >> > >> major
> > > > > >> > >> highlights here, that I can go add
> to
> > > the
> > > > release
> > > > > notes?
> > > > > >> > >> Jewel should at least have several
> > > updates.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> Om
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:09 PM
> Alex
> > > Harui
> > > > > >> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> > Hey, I just noticed that nobody
> put
> > > a 0.9.4
> > > > > section in
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > >> RELEASE_NOTES.
> > > > > >> > >> > Maybe just rename the 0.9.3
> > section?
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > -Alex
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > On 10/1/18, 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash
> > > > Muppirala" <
> > > > > >> > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > Good catch! I just pushed a
> > fix
> > > for
> > > > that.
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> > Om
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:04
> AM
> > > Alex
> > > > Harui
> > > > > >> > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >> > > Om,
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > I think the
> > > <tag>release/0.9.4</tag>
> > > > in
> > > > > >> > royale-asjs/pom.xml
> > > > > >> > >> needs to
> > > > > >> > >> > be
> > > > > >> > >> > > reverted back to 0.9.3.
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > Everything else looks ok
> from
> > > my
> > > > quick
> > > > > >> examination.
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > Thanks and good luck,
> > > > > >> > >> > > -Alex
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > On 10/1/18, 10:29 AM,
> "Piotr
> > > > Zarzycki" <
> > > > > >> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > I saw your commit and
I
> > > think you
> > > > > should be
> > > > > >> ok.
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > pon., 1 paź 2018 o
> 19:21
> > > > OmPrakash
> > > > > Muppirala
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >> > >> > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > Okay, I did the
> > > following to
> > > > reset:
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > For all three repos:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > * Reverted all
> > > references of
> > > > 0.9.5
> > > > > to 0.9.4
> > > > > >> > >> > > > * Deleted 0.9.4-rc1
> tag
> > > > > >> > >> > > > * Deleted branch:
> > > release/0.9.4
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > Can someone please
> make
> > > sure
> > > > that we
> > > > > are
> > > > > >> good
> > > > > >> > before
> > > > > >> > >> starting
> > > > > >> > >> > work?
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > Om
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018
> at
> > > 1:51 AM
> > > > Carlos
> > > > > >> Rovira <
> > > > > >> > >> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > >> > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > is related to
flash
> > > player
> > > > > debugger not
> > > > > >> > launched? are
> > > > > >> > >> you on
> > > > > >> > >> > Mac?
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I think on Mac I
> have
> > > to
> > > > make *.swf
> > > > > >> files be
> > > > > >> > always
> > > > > >> > >> opened
> > > > > >> > >> > by Flash
> > > > > >> > >> > > > Player
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > debugger.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > In the other hand,
> I
> > > need to
> > > > commit
> > > > > >> during the
> > > > > >> > day
> > > > > >> > >> some
> > > > > >> > >> > fixes, one
> > > > > >> > >> > > on
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > typedefs and
expect
> > > more on
> > > > > compiler. So
> > > > > >> if you
> > > > > >> > plan
> > > > > >> > >> to try
> > > > > >> > >> > again
> > > > > >> > >> > > some
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > hours ago, please,
> > > remove the
> > > > > commits to
> > > > > >> left
> > > > > >> > the
> > > > > >> > >> repos so
> > > > > >> > >> > we can
> > > > > >> > >> > > commit
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > new work
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > thanks!
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Carlos
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > El lun., 1 oct.
> 2018
> > a
> > > las
> > > > 10:29,
> > > > > >> OmPrakash
> > > > > >> > Muppirala
> > > > > >> > >> (<
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> bigosma...@gmail.com
> > >)
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > I provided path
> to
> > > Chrome
> > > > via
> > > > > >> -Dbrowser, but
> > > > > >> > I got
> > > > > >> > >> an
> > > > > >> > >> > error that
> > > > > >> > >> > > ant
> > > > > >> > >> > > > was
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > not able to
> access
> > > the
> > > > > application.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > So, I tried
> > > installing
> > > > firefox
> > > > > and that
> > > > > >> > seemed to
> > > > > >> > >> work.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 1,
> 2018
> > > at
> > > > 1:26 AM
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >> Zarzycki
> > > > > >> > <
> > > > > >> > >> > > >
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > You did use
> > > Firefox for
> > > > that
> > > > > purpose
> > > > > >> ? I
> > > > > >> > had to
> > > > > >> > >> specify
> > > > > >> > >> > > > -Dbrowser=path
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > firefox.exe
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > pon., 1 paź
> 2018
> > o
> > > 10:22
> > > > > OmPrakash
> > > > > >> > Muppirala <
> > > > > >> > >> > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Okay, I made
> > > several
> > > > attempts
> > > > > >> through the
> > > > > >> > day,
> > > > > >> > >> making
> > > > > >> > >> > > progress each
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > time.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > The last
run
> > > failed
> > > > because
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> browser
> > > > > >> > could
> > > > > >> > >> not be
> > > > > >> > >> > > launched.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > I am going
to
> > > pause on
> > > > this
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> try again
> > > > > >> > >> tomorrow (or
> > > > > >> > >> > > later) . If
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > someone
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > else wants
to
> > > give
> > > > this a go
> > > > > in the
> > > > > >> > meantimne,
> > > > > >> > >> they are
> > > > > >> > >> > > welcome :-)
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Om
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct
> 1,
> > > 2018 at
> > > > 12:22
> > > > > AM
> > > > > >> Carlos
> > > > > >> > Rovira <
> > > > > >> > >> > > > >
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > no, I
> > Thought
> > > this
> > > > was
> > > > > due to
> > > > > >> different
> > > > > >> > >> tries of the
> > > > > >> > >> > > release
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > process
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > but
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > most of
the
> > > poms are
> > > > in
> > > > > >> 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > You can
> > search
> > > the
> > > > entire
> > > > > repo
> > > > > >> for
> > > > > >> > >> "0.9.X-SNAPSHOT"
> > > > > >> > >> > string
> > > > > >> > >> > > to see
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > that
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > now
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > X is 6.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > El lun., 1
> > > oct. 2018
> > > > a las
> > > > > 2:07,
> > > > > >> > OmPrakash
> > > > > >> > >> Muppirala
> > > > > >> > >> > (<
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > bigosma...@gmail.com
> > > > >)
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Sun,
> Sep
> > > 30,
> > > > 2018,
> > > > > 2:13 PM
> > > > > >> Carlos
> > > > > >> > Rovira
> > > > > >> > >> <
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > just
> saw
> > > that
> > > > some
> > > > > poms was
> > > > > >> not
> > > > > >> > changed to
> > > > > >> > >> > > 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Do you
> mean
> > > > > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT?
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Om
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I think
> > that
> > > > should be
> > > > > fixed
> > > > > >> and get a
> > > > > >> > >> prepare
> > > > > >> > >> > maven
> > > > > >> > >> > > release
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > process
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > finaly
> > > > gets all
> > > > > poms
> > > > > >> updated
> > > > > >> > to new
> > > > > >> > >> > version.
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Don't
> > know
> > > if
> > > > that
> > > > > could be
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > problem.
> > > > > >> > >> Can you
> > > > > >> > >> > try
> > > > > >> > >> > > again?
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > El
> dom.,
> > 30
> > > > sept. 2018
> > > > > a las
> > > > > >> 21:32,
> > > > > >> > >> OmPrakash
> > > > > >> > >> > > Muppirala (<
> > > > > >> > >>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon:
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265966449&sdata=UVUPrho84N83EiOJWtPikK7OSroVdaNXSDGXZfPWh4c%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb64ac5ec10034057bdf408d62e9608d4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636747619265966449&sdata=UVUPrho84N83EiOJWtPikK7OSroVdaNXSDGXZfPWh4c%3D&reserved=0>*
