Hi Alex,
while example in mx doesn't work form me as I reported in latest email (due
to *viewBead.beforeLayout* error), I was able to make MX RO work on a
custom simple example I'm creating as a duplicate of the old net RO test.
This are my findings:
1.- I can't get event result working at mx:method (Operation) level
<mx:method name="echo" result="onEchoResult(event)"/>
onEchoResult is not firing
2.- This is more about the use of RO in real life: We should take into
account how people use RemoteObjects. For quick examples, create tags in
MXML is ok, like the current example, with mx:method and mx:arguments. But
in real world projects people use to do the following as part of a normal
client service micro Arquitecture:
asynctoken.addResponder( new Responder( resultHandler, faultHandler ) );
As well calling a method use to be:
service.someMethod()
instead of
service.someMethod.send(["param1", "param2"])
Following is issues I have in VSCode with this new code. So mostly
cosmetically but important to avoid see a complete file underlined with red
lines and difficult to develop:
1.- "symbol" inside mx:arguments is reporting
*"This tag could not be resolved to an ActionScript class. It will be
ignored."*
is something in the SDK side or should I report to Josh so this could be
fixed in the plugin?
2.- Binding for Operations report: "Data binding will not be able to detect
assignments to 'echo'.
<j:Label id="result_txt" text="Received: {(service.echo as
Operation).lastResult}"/>
don't know if is something we can fix from our side or must report to Josh
so it can be addressed in the plugin.
HTH
Carlos
El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 11:35, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected]>)
escribió:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I see you fixed poms and now all is building correctly in maven in my .m2
> with 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT. I remove all .m2 artificats to build from a clean
> state. Thanks, since all is now more clear.
>
> When I tried to run the MX RO example build with maven it fails with this:
>
> TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'viewBead.beforeLayout')
> dispatchEvent — EventDispatcher.js:74
> dispatchEvent — HTMLElementWrapper.js:245:86
> setWidth — UIBase.js:136
> set__width — UIBase.js:703
> initializeStrandBasedObject — MXMLDataInterpreter.js:195
> generateMXMLArray — MXMLDataInterpreter.js:125
> generateMXMLInstances — MXMLDataInterpreter.js:266
> createChildren — Container.js:139
> createChildren — Application.js:112
> initialize — UIComponent.js:647
> addedToParent — UIComponent.js:267
> addedToParent — Container.js:126
> addElement — UIBase.js:414
> addChild — SystemManager.js:107
> initializeTopLevelWindow — SystemManager.js:237
> start — SystemManager.js:223
> Código global — index.html:572
>
> I saw this kind of fail in the other mx examples build with maven. What
> could be the difference since ANT build seems to work, but MAVEN build not.
> Maybe some config to take into account for MX example projects?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 0:28, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I'm fixing version numbers in maven projects and when all is set to
>> 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, the error I announced up in this thread comes again:
>>
>> [*INFO*] *--- *royale-maven-plugin:0.9.5-SNAPSHOT:compile-as
>> *(default-compile-as)* @ MXRoyale* ---*
>>
>> [*INFO*] Executing COMPC in tool group Royale with args:
>> [-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml,
>> -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::JS,true,
>> -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::SWF,false,
>> -js-compiler-define=GOOG::DEBUG,goog.DEBUG,
>> -js-compiler-define=ROYALE::DISPLAYOBJECT,IUIComponent,
>> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale, -compiler.strict-xml=true]
>>
>> args:
>>
>>
>> -load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml
>>
>> -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::JS,true
>>
>> -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::SWF,false
>>
>> -js-compiler-define=GOOG::DEBUG,goog.DEBUG
>>
>> -js-compiler-define=ROYALE::DISPLAYOBJECT,IUIComponent
>>
>> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
>>
>> -compiler.strict-xml=true
>>
>> target:SWF
>>
>> target:JSRoyale
>>
>> COMPC
>>
>> Loading configuration:
>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml
>>
>>
>> Error: Unexpected exception 'java.lang.NullPointerException'.
>>
>>
>>
>> Unexpected exception 'java.lang.NullPointerException'.
>>
>> You're not getting it due to a fake compilation that makes asjs use 0.9.4
>> compiler and not 0.9.5 (the current code)
>>
>> As I stated before in the start release thread, we should stabilize the
>> repo to avoid much confusion.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 23:55, Carlos Rovira (<
>> [email protected]>) escribió:
>>
>>> Ok Alex,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to create a basic test with Jewel and MX RO. First problem I
>>> get is that "symbol" tag inside mx:arguments is not recognized
>>>
>>> This tag could not be resolved to an ActionScript class. It will be
>>> ignored.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's only recognized in MX environment? if so could it be enhanced
>>> to be valid in Jewel?
>>>
>>> In the other hand, I wasn't able to build mxroyale example RO with
>>> maven. Only can be build with ANT, don't know why.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 18:48, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>>> I don't think RemoteObject is a bead. See the example at
>>>> examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest.
>>>>
>>>> I got the ServerConfig error as well but it didn't seem to affect the
>>>> example's bin/js-debug version.
>>>>
>>>> You might want to actually build your test setup with Flex so you know
>>>> it "will" work. For example, you did not show any of your code that setup
>>>> an Operation called "someMethod" so the error you got would be expected
>>>> even in Flex.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 10/11/18, 4:47 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> I tried to use MX RO but doesn't work. Here's what the info of this
>>>> test:
>>>>
>>>> Code:
>>>>
>>>> to make a quick test I put this code to run at "initComplete" event:
>>>>
>>>> private function prepareChannelSet(event:Event):void
>>>> {
>>>> var amfEndpoint:String = "
>>>> http://localhost:8080/webapp/messagebroker/my-amf";;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> var channelSet:ChannelSet = new ChannelSet();
>>>> var channel:AMFChannel = new AMFChannel("my-amf", amfEndpoint);
>>>> channelSet.addChannel(channel);
>>>> service.channelSet = channelSet;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I add the MX RO as a bead
>>>>
>>>> <j:beads>
>>>> <mx:RemoteObject id="service"
>>>> result="onResult(event)"
>>>> fault="onFault(event)"
>>>> destination = "myDestination"/>
>>>> </j:beads>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After compilation (successful) I get the following trace that
>>>> should be
>>>> fixed:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> */Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Codeoscopic/Source/sgc/webapp/src/main/webapp/javascript/bin/js-debug/App.js*
>>>> *end of list of source files*
>>>> *oct 11, 2018 1:33:04 PM
>>>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager
>>>> println*
>>>> *ADVERTENCIA:
>>>>
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Codeoscopic/Source/sgc/webapp/src/main/webapp/javascript/bin/js-debug/mx/rpc/remoting/Operation.js:103:
>>>> WARNING - Bad type annotation. extra @override/@inheritDoc tag. See
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FBad-Type-Annotation&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=amVdMLEOdxGJJQl28VLNxpJRO92Hj3tdARUAvfQxois%3D&reserved=0
>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FBad-Type-Annotation&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=amVdMLEOdxGJJQl28VLNxpJRO92Hj3tdARUAvfQxois%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> for
>>>> more information.*
>>>> * * @override*
>>>> * ^*
>>>>
>>>> *oct 11, 2018 1:33:04 PM
>>>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager
>>>> println*
>>>> *ADVERTENCIA:
>>>>
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Codeoscopic/Source/sgc/webapp/src/main/webapp/javascript/bin/js-debug/mx/rpc/remoting/Operation.js:150:
>>>> WARNING - Bad type annotation. extra @override/@inheritDoc tag. See
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FBad-Type-Annotation&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=amVdMLEOdxGJJQl28VLNxpJRO92Hj3tdARUAvfQxois%3D&reserved=0
>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FBad-Type-Annotation&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=amVdMLEOdxGJJQl28VLNxpJRO92Hj3tdARUAvfQxois%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> for
>>>> more information.*
>>>> * * @override*
>>>> * ^*
>>>>
>>>> *oct 11, 2018 1:33:04 PM
>>>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager
>>>> println*
>>>> *GRAVE:
>>>>
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Codeoscopic/Source/sgc/webapp/src/main/webapp/javascript/bin/js-debug/mx/messaging/config/ServerConfig.js:333:
>>>> ERROR - Parse error. invalid assignment target*
>>>> *
>>>> mx.messaging.config.ServerConfig["xml"].child("default-channels") =
>>>> newServices.child("default-channels");*
>>>> *
>>>> ^*
>>>>
>>>> *oct 11, 2018 1:33:04 PM
>>>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager
>>>> printSummary*
>>>> *ADVERTENCIA: 1 error(s), 2 warning(s)*
>>>> *The project 'App' has been successfully compiled and optimized.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then the problems at Runtime. Trying to call a method in the
>>>> service like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> *service.someMethod(someParam);*
>>>>
>>>> I get in browser console this error:
>>>>
>>>> *TypeError: this.service.someMethod is not a function. (In
>>>> 'this.service.someMethod(someParam)', 'this.service.someMethod' is
>>>> undefined)*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations, I you are mostly at 99% to get official MX
>>>> RemoteObject
>>>> working :)
>>>>
>>>> Carlos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 12:41, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>> [email protected]>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Alex,
>>>> >
>>>> > strangely, now build is passing locally...can't figure why
>>>> yesterday it
>>>> > was failing...maybe part of the build was in the change of day at
>>>> > 00:00...just speculating..
>>>> >
>>>> > I'll try to put mx RO to work and see I see and report :)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 12:18, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>> [email protected]>)
>>>> > escribió:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Hi Alex,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> yes, I always compile first compiler, then typedefs and last
>>>> asjs.
>>>> >> I'll try again. Maybe the maven-prepare-release could be doing
>>>> making
>>>> >> some problem with the change of version 0.9.4 to 0.9.5?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 9:30, Alex Harui
>>>> (<[email protected]>)
>>>> >> escribió:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> I can't reproduce the failure. It worked on builds.a.o as
>>>> well. Did
>>>> >>> you run mvn on the compiler first?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -Alex
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 10/10/18, 4:38 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I must close for today, tomorrow will try to change net RO
>>>> for mx RO
>>>> >>> if you
>>>> >>> finally get this build error fixed.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Carlos
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 23:34, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>> >>> [email protected]>)
>>>> >>> escribió:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> > That's great Alex! :)
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > I want to try it but I found the following error building
>>>> with
>>>> >>> maven:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *----------------<
>>>> *org.apache.royale.framework:MXRoyale*
>>>> >>> > >----------------*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *Building Apache Royale: Framework: Libs:
>>>> MXRoyale
>>>> >>> > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT [32/118]*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *--------------------------------[ swc
>>>> >>> > ]---------------------------------*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *--- *maven-clean-plugin:3.0.0:clean
>>>> *(default-clean)* @
>>>> >>> MXRoyale*
>>>> >>> > ---*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *---
>>>> *royale-maven-plugin:0.9.4-SNAPSHOT:generate-extern
>>>> >>> > *(default-generate-extern)* @ MXRoyale* ---*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *--- *maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process
>>>> >>> > *(process-resource-bundles)* @ MXRoyale* ---*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *--- *maven-resources-plugin:2.7:resources
>>>> >>> *(default-resources)*
>>>> >>> > @ MXRoyale* ---*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered
>>>> resources.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Copying 3 resources
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Copying 3 resources
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] *---
>>>> *royale-maven-plugin:0.9.4-SNAPSHOT:compile-as
>>>> >>> > *(default-compile-as)* @ MXRoyale* ---*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Executing COMPC in tool group Royale with args:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> [-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml,
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::JS,true,
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::SWF,false,
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=GOOG::DEBUG,goog.DEBUG,
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=ROYALE::DISPLAYOBJECT,IUIComponent,
>>>> >>> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale, -compiler.strict-xml=true]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > args:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> -load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::JS,true
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=COMPILE::SWF,false
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=GOOG::DEBUG,goog.DEBUG
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -js-compiler-define=ROYALE::DISPLAYOBJECT,IUIComponent
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > -compiler.strict-xml=true
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > target:SWF
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > target:JSRoyale
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > COMPC
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Loading configuration:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/target/compile-swf-config.xml
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Error: Unexpected exception
>>>> 'java.lang.NullPointerException'.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Unexpected exception 'java.lang.NullPointerException'.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > ...
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: RoyaleSite
>>>> .........
>>>> >>> *SUCCESS*
>>>> >>> > [ 0.771 s]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: MXRoyale
>>>> ...........
>>>> >>> *FAILURE*
>>>> >>> > [ 1.529 s]
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Icons
>>>> ..............
>>>> >>> *SKIPPED*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: SparkRoyale
>>>> ........
>>>> >>> *SKIPPED*
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > I'm trying to build with the 2 commits of the latest
>>>> failed release
>>>> >>> > reverted to build 0.9.4. (I think we should revert those
>>>> since, I
>>>> >>> suppose
>>>> >>> > are not valid now).
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Thanks
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 21:41, Alex Harui
>>>> >>> (<[email protected]>)
>>>> >>> > escribió:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >> We especially want the RemoteObject in Network.swc to be
>>>> PAYG. MX
>>>> >>> >> RemoteObject was never PAYG.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Having looked at the code more, I see what you are
>>>> saying about
>>>> >>> Operation
>>>> >>> >> not having its own fault and result handlers. It looks
>>>> like
>>>> >>> there already
>>>> >>> >> is a SimpleOperation, so Operation could introduce its
>>>> own fault
>>>> >>> and result
>>>> >>> >> handlers.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> FWIW, I just pushed the changes to the compiler and
>>>> emulation
>>>> >>> code that
>>>> >>> >> got MX RemoteObject to work. So that could be an option
>>>> for
>>>> >>> you. I'm sure
>>>> >>> >> there might be bugs remaining to be fixed, but there is
>>>> quite a
>>>> >>> bit of old
>>>> >>> >> Flex code that is now running pretty much unchanged.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> -Alex
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> On 10/10/18, 2:33 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Hi Alex
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 18:14, Alex Harui
>>>> >>> >> (<[email protected]>)
>>>> >>> >> escribió:
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> > As long as Responders are PAYG and not baked into
>>>> the basic
>>>> >>> RO
>>>> >>> >> > implementation, it is fine for others to try to
>>>> replicate
>>>> >>> subsets
>>>> >>> >> of MX
>>>> >>> >> > RemoteObject, but it still seems like duplication
>>>> of effort.
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> well, I'm talking not about MX RO, bur the current
>>>> one we
>>>> >>> have in
>>>> >>> >> Network.swc that is working.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> That means is not a duplicate effort, take into
>>>> account that
>>>> >>> I'm
>>>> >>> >> right now
>>>> >>> >> coding a real world Apache Royale application, and
>>>> need to
>>>> >>> get the
>>>> >>> >> work
>>>> >>> >> done. I expect this could be a win for this project
>>>> since is
>>>> >>> an
>>>> >>> >> important
>>>> >>> >> project and an important client that are betting for
>>>> Apache
>>>> >>> Royale :).
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > That said, I have not used RO or Responders in any
>>>> real
>>>> >>> world
>>>> >>> >> application
>>>> >>> >> > myself. I'm not sure I understand the need for
>>>> them vs
>>>> >>> just adding
>>>> >>> >> more
>>>> >>> >> > listeners to the result and fault event.
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Each RO use to have several Operations (aka methods
>>>> that we
>>>> >>> want to
>>>> >>> >> call in
>>>> >>> >> the backend). In real world scenarios, we want each
>>>> RO
>>>> >>> callback logic
>>>> >>> >> will
>>>> >>> >> be unique. If I call a service for a user list, I
>>>> want to
>>>> >>> fill the
>>>> >>> >> list in
>>>> >>> >> royale, but if I want to ask for a concrete user
>>>> data, I want
>>>> >>> to fill
>>>> >>> >> a
>>>> >>> >> form with that data.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> Now, all Operations will be throw a result event and
>>>> therefor
>>>> >>> all
>>>> >>> >> listeners
>>>> >>> >> will fire, executing all methods. With listeners, we
>>>> can use
>>>> >>> >> if-then-else
>>>> >>> >> to and some logic to execute parts of the listener,
>>>> but a
>>>> >>> Responder
>>>> >>> >> implementation, should make the appropriate
>>>> responder be
>>>> >>> executed.
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> In order to structure and organizar a real world
>>>> application
>>>> >>> that is
>>>> >>> >> a bit
>>>> >>> >> complex this is needed to separate all this logic
>>>> across
>>>> >>> files.
>>>> >>> >> (In a tiny application, you can use the if-then-else
>>>> approach
>>>> >>> since
>>>> >>> >> is more
>>>> >>> >> like a example).
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > My 2 cents,
>>>> >>> >> > -Alex
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > On 10/9/18, 3:46 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <
>>>> >>> [email protected]>
>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > Hi Piotr,
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > I think if I get some improvement over the
>>>> current RO
>>>> >>> with
>>>> >>> >> Responders
>>>> >>> >> > that
>>>> >>> >> > could go to develop. Other thing is I tried to
>>>> make it
>>>> >>> work in
>>>> >>> >> mx RO.
>>>> >>> >> > People using Royale RO will benefit from it.
>>>> If some
>>>> >>> day mx RO
>>>> >>> >> is
>>>> >>> >> > ready, I
>>>> >>> >> > think we'll shift to mx RO, although royale RO
>>>> could be
>>>> >>> >> continue to be
>>>> >>> >> > valid (since is a small implementation that
>>>> works), or
>>>> >>> we could
>>>> >>> >> decide
>>>> >>> >> > deprecate it. Anyway, I'm not talking to make
>>>> >>> improvements over
>>>> >>> >> > something
>>>> >>> >> > that others will evolve separately, I want to
>>>> improve
>>>> >>> something
>>>> >>> >> that
>>>> >>> >> > otherwise will remain as is.
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 12:39, Piotr
>>>> Zarzycki (<
>>>> >>> >> > [email protected]>)
>>>> >>> >> > escribió:
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > > Carlos,
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > You can always use branch, make your changes
>>>> and wait
>>>> >>> for the
>>>> >>> >> proper
>>>> >>> >> > one
>>>> >>> >> > > using branch. Some time ago Harbs did it the
>>>> same as
>>>> >>> far as I
>>>> >>> >> > remember.
>>>> >>> >> > > There is no need to wait if you need
>>>> something ASAP.
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > Thanks,
>>>> >>> >> > > Piotr
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > wt., 9 paź 2018 o 12:36 Carlos Rovira <
>>>> >>> >> [email protected]>
>>>> >>> >> > > napisał(a):
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > Hi Alex,
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > since there's no planned ETA for anyone
>>>> here (that
>>>> >>> I know),
>>>> >>> >> I
>>>> >>> >> > could try
>>>> >>> >> > > at
>>>> >>> >> > > > some point to have a minimal Responder
>>>> >>> functionality in the
>>>> >>> >> current
>>>> >>> >> > > working
>>>> >>> >> > > > RO. Does not have sense to duplicate all
>>>> the code
>>>> >>> but I
>>>> >>> >> think has
>>>> >>> >> > sense
>>>> >>> >> > > to
>>>> >>> >> > > > see if some little changes can provide the
>>>> minimal
>>>> >>> needs.
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > thanks
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > El mar., 9 oct. 2018 a las 0:25, Alex Harui
>>>> >>> >> > (<[email protected]>)
>>>> >>> >> > > > escribió:
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > I think you'll have to wait until
>>>> someone gets
>>>> >>> all of the
>>>> >>> >> old
>>>> >>> >> > Flex RO
>>>> >>> >> > > > code
>>>> >>> >> > > > > to compile and run. I'm currently still
>>>> >>> debugging the
>>>> >>> >> compiler,
>>>> >>> >> > so no
>>>> >>> >> > > > way
>>>> >>> >> > > > > it will be ready tomorrow.
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > It doesn't make sense to try to
>>>> duplicate all of
>>>> >>> this
>>>> >>> >> code and
>>>> >>> >> > get it
>>>> >>> >> > > to
>>>> >>> >> > > > > work some other way.
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > -Alex
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > On 10/8/18, 3:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <
>>>> >>> >> [email protected]>
>>>> >>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Hi Alex,
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > I'm closing for today, but tomorrow
>>>> I'll need
>>>> >>> to
>>>> >>> >> handle more
>>>> >>> >> > than
>>>> >>> >> > > one
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Responder for RemoteObject calls, so
>>>> each
>>>> >>> >> operation/method
>>>> >>> >> > can have
>>>> >>> >> > > > > it's
>>>> >>> >> > > > > own responder and create methods for
>>>> each one
>>>> >>> in my
>>>> >>> >> > controllers.
>>>> >>> >> > > with
>>>> >>> >> > > > > the
>>>> >>> >> > > > > current RemoteObject implementation
>>>> could you
>>>> >>> share
>>>> >>> >> what
>>>> >>> >> > could be
>>>> >>> >> > > the
>>>> >>> >> > > > > most
>>>> >>> >> > > > > quick and easy way to get this while
>>>> the full
>>>> >>> RO
>>>> >>> >> > implementation is
>>>> >>> >> > > on
>>>> >>> >> > > > > the
>>>> >>> >> > > > > works? Now that I'm starting to grow
>>>> the app
>>>> >>> code
>>>> >>> >> base I can
>>>> >>> >> > rely
>>>> >>> >> > > on
>>>> >>> >> > > > a
>>>> >>> >> > > > > result handler full of if-then-else
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Thanks for any help on this
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Carlos
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 18:52,
>>>> Carlos
>>>> >>> Rovira (<
>>>> >>> >> > > > > [email protected]>)
>>>> >>> >> > > > > escribió:
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > Ok Alex, thanks, didn't know that
>>>> you have
>>>> >>> this
>>>> >>> >> task to
>>>> >>> >> > make it
>>>> >>> >> > > > work
>>>> >>> >> > > > > RO. I
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > though you only try to compile it.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > That's good to know. I'm trying
>>>> right now
>>>> >>> to make a
>>>> >>> >> real
>>>> >>> >> > world
>>>> >>> >> > > app
>>>> >>> >> > > > > and
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > since I don't have a micro
>>>> structural IOC
>>>> >>> framework
>>>> >>> >> like
>>>> >>> >> > Swiz,
>>>> >>> >> > > that
>>>> >>> >> > > > > was
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > that I use in Flex, I'm trying to
>>>> structure
>>>> >>> and
>>>> >>> >> organize
>>>> >>> >> > screens,
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > controllers, delegates, and so on,
>>>> and I'm
>>>> >>> trying
>>>> >>> >> to put
>>>> >>> >> > things
>>>> >>> >> > > as
>>>> >>> >> > > > > easy as
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > possible so I can refactor more
>>>> later to
>>>> >>> something
>>>> >>> >> more
>>>> >>> >> > suited
>>>> >>> >> > > for
>>>> >>> >> > > > > this
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > task, since I don't have time now
>>>> to build a
>>>> >>> >> framework for
>>>> >>> >> > this
>>>> >>> >> > > due
>>>> >>> >> > > > > to
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > reduced time lines.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > If you get this RO proxy way to
>>>> call backend
>>>> >>> >> methods and
>>>> >>> >> > > > AsyncToken,
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > that's what I need to connect with
>>>> MX
>>>> >>> RemoteObject
>>>> >>> >> in the
>>>> >>> >> > same
>>>> >>> >> > > way
>>>> >>> >> > > > > we use
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > to do.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > I'll be waiting for your. progress
>>>> there
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > thanks
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > Carlos
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > El lun., 8 oct. 2018 a las 17:28,
>>>> Alex Harui
>>>> >>> >> > > > > (<[email protected]>)
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > escribió:
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> I believe I already said I am
>>>> working on
>>>> >>> >> RemoteObject.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> The Flex compiler generates
>>>> custom code for
>>>> >>> >> > mx:RemoteObject.
>>>> >>> >> > > The
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Royale
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> Compiler currently does not. I
>>>> am working
>>>> >>> on it.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> Thanks,
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> -Alex
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> On 10/8/18, 3:13 AM, "Carlos
>>>> Rovira" <
>>>> >>> >> > [email protected]>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > wrote:
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> Hi,
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> I was experimenting trying to
>>>> get
>>>> >>> RemoteObject
>>>> >>> >> to
>>>> >>> >> > proxy
>>>> >>> >> > > method
>>>> >>> >> > > > > calls.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> so instead of doing
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> service.send("echo",
>>>> [name_txt.text]);
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> be able to do:
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> service.echo(name_txt.text);
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> I tried with Proxy class
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> (org.apache.royale.utils.Proxy)
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> and implementing
>>>> IEventDispatcher, but
>>>> >>> >> compiler throws
>>>> >>> >> > > error:
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> Call to a possibly undefined
>>>> method
>>>> >>> echo
>>>> >>> >> through a
>>>> >>> >> > reference
>>>> >>> >> > > > > with
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> static
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> type RemoteObject.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> It's possible to do something
>>>> like
>>>> >>> this? what
>>>> >>> >> I'm
>>>> >>> >> > missing?
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> This seems a little
>>>> enhancement, but
>>>> >>> it would
>>>> >>> >> be cool
>>>> >>> >> > if we
>>>> >>> >> > > > get
>>>> >>> >> > > > > it in
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> order
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> to be more near of the normal
>>>> syntax
>>>> >>> we all
>>>> >>> >> have in
>>>> >>> >> > our code
>>>> >>> >> > > > > bases.
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> thanks
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> --
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >> Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=407cmARvA38%2BzfR24AXytje3%2FhK5Op0G2jrCunTURsg%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >>
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > --
>>>> >>> >> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749104312&sdata=407cmARvA38%2BzfR24AXytje3%2FhK5Op0G2jrCunTURsg%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > > --
>>>> >>> >> > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > > > --
>>>> >>> >> > > > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > > >
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > --
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> > > Patreon: *
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=wM%2BPK3cCW9orJQjOX8gLM2GdohXQM7q7xtIKddKpevk%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > > <
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=wM%2BPK3cCW9orJQjOX8gLM2GdohXQM7q7xtIKddKpevk%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> > >*
>>>> >>> >> > >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> > --
>>>> >>> >> > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >> >
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >> --
>>>> >>> >> Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >>
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > --
>>>> >>> > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Carlos Rovira
>>>> >>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Carlos Rovira
>>>> >
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc9d88800eac54470516c08d62f6f611f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636748552749114321&sdata=7hBkqCKylKPb2%2BgvslLQy4IeLF8YaUBOQrcc%2BFUbtLM%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
