Hi Alina,
Add the following metadata to your shmApplication.as It should go before the
"public class". Check mx.core.Application to see how it is placed in that file.
[Frame(factoryClass="mx.managers.SystemManager")]
This should result in an applications_mx_managers_SystemManager.js file in the
bin/js-debug folder, and the index.html should try to instantiate that file
which should then launch everything else.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/28/18, 11:54 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Files in the bin/js-debug folder
Files :
AppView_ERP.js
applications.css
applications.js
index.html
Namespace.js
QName.js
shmApplication.js
XML.js
XMLList.js
Folders :
library
mx
org
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:48 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
When you use shmApplication, what files end up in the bin/js-debug folder
(the subfolders don't matter right now).
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/28/18, 11:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Yes, I am running the js-debug version. If I do similar working in
mx:Application tag it works but when I do it with custom shmApplication control
that extends mx.core.Application it does not show anything in output.
My file applications.mxml starts with tag <cc:shmApplication>
And shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application. I am adding
namespace xmlns:cc="*"
[1] applications.mxml
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOpDT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=iqFK286el0Vq47KPyDIRbJ%2FTySc7AuX7lQtA9Bo%2BNpQ%3D&reserved=0
[2] shmApplication.as
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FPz6p&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=gMyQgK7Dvn34ay9zG7sneX%2BJqUcZtNLms6nYWJPmwDk%3D&reserved=0
[3] AppView_ERP.mxml
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRLcA&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=P8s9MB0KurHHGOy02dPK35uLMnpnIG4vA5Pv2jdte8I%3D&reserved=0
All files are placed on same path.
When I replace applications.mxml opening and closing tag
<cc:shmApplication> tag to <mx:Application>
It shows both Button and Label in output. But I need to use
shmApplication.
Again these are not my actual source files . It's just a scenario we
need . So, I create a separate example for that.
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 11:02 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Are you running the version in js-debug? It should show something in
the console. Also look at the DOM tree and see what HTML elements have been
created, if any.
-Alex
On 10/28/18, 10:28 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Piotr,
Application is compiled Successfully but nothing shows in output in
the Web Browser Console when running my application.
Thanks,
Alina
-----Original Message-----
From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:09 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Just to help a bit with all of that. Do you see any output in the
Web
Browser Console when you running your application ? If yes provide
it here.
Thanks,
Piotr
pt., 26 paź 2018 o 14:42 Alina Kazi <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
napisał(a):
> Hi Alex,
> We have 3 files in our Project
> Files Path is :
> [1]Project -> applications.mxml (main file)
> [2]Project ->shmApplication.as extends mx.core.Application
> [3]Project-> AppView_ERP.mxml
>
> As MX ViewStack , Canvas are working controls.
>
> AppView_ERP.mxml has initial tag mx:Canvas
>
> applications.mxml has initial tag cc:shmApplication and
> We have method in applications.mxml
> private function fn_roBasicConfRH(e:ResultEvent):void
> {
> var appViewStack:ViewStack = new
> ViewStack();
>
> appViewStack.percentWidth = 100;
> appViewStack.percentHeight = 100;
> this.addElement(appViewStack);
>
> var compERPView:Canvas = new
AppView_ERP()
> as Canvas;
>
> compERPView.id = "appView_ERP";
> appView = compERPView;
>
appViewStack.addElement(compERPView);
>
> mx.external.ExternalInterface.call("function
> setWinStatus(){window.status='" + iniFileParams.CompanyName +
"';}");
>
> }
> Application is compiled Successfully but nothing shows in output.
> If you need more details. I can create an example Project.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alina Kazi [mailto:alina.k...@d-bz.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:35 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> We have replaced import spark.components.Application with import
> mx.core.Application in our whole Application. After this change
we are
> still able to compile our Application successfully.
> Are you using SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your
API
> Report did not mention this.
> We are not using SWFLoader anywhere in our Application. We are
using
> ModuleLoader only.
> What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times?
> Sorry, import spark.components.Application is written multiple
times in
> src code but used once.
>
> That means now we don't need Spark Application.
> Thanks for Helping us.
>
> -Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 12:45 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Where did you use mx:Application in your application? Somehow it
got into
> the report.
>
> What do you mean by needing Spark Application many times? Are
you using
> SWFLoader to load other applications? Again, your API Report did
not
> mention this.
>
> Getting Application to work can be significant amount of work as
it has a
> lot of things to do. One approach you could take is to step
through your
> example with mx:Application and compare it to the Spark
Application and
> make changes to the Spark Application until it works, but I'm
concerned
> that you can't always copy code from mx:Application.
>
> If you want to take on a big challenge like getting Appilcation
to work
> that is fine, but I guess I can delay my work on Charts and get
Spark
> Application to work. Let me know what you decide. But I am very
concerned
> about the accuracy of the data you have provided. I'm wondering
what else
> you are using that we don't know about.
>
> I'm done for today. I will see what you decide in my morning.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/26/18, 12:22 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex ,
> I am using skinClass 2 times overall in my Application. I can
skip
> that if it takes a lot of time.
> I don't know How API report skip some API's.
> We need SparkApplication at many places in our Application.
> If you can explain more in [1] , we want to also participate
in
> getting emulation component to run.
>
> Like Spark TextInput is now working as MX TextInput, We have
copied
> some source from MX TextInput to Spark TextInput after reading
[1] and it
> worked.
>
> [1]
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FEmulation-Components%23getting-an-emulation-component-to-run&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=f0ZemJCrt3mNtse3%2BSCRnOxfYyVzT1zfFqXqnTO0mFw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:50 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> In your API report, only mx.core.Application was referenced.
I don't
> understand why Spark Application was not referenced, yet you are
using it
> now. We have not spent any time getting Spark Application to
run. If
> that's really what you need, I would start copying code from
> mx.core.Application. if you don't have custom skins for
Application, you
> can probably skip the skinning-related code.
>
> Good luck,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/25/18, 11:10 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> We are able to compile our Application and Library
Projects
> successfully. Application Launch file uses a file that extends
Spark
> Application.as file. This Spark Application.as file is present
in Apache
> Royale SDK repo and has been emulated. But when we run the
application, No
> visual output is shown in index.html (i.e output file)
>
> Spark Application extends SkinnableContainer in Flex SDK
> default.css for SkinnableContainer is:
> SkinnableContainer
> {
> skinClass:
> ClassReference("spark.skins.spark.SkinnableContainerSkin");
> }
>
>
> In Flex mx:Application extends LayoutContainer extends
Container
> in Flex SDK default.css for Container is
>
> Container
> {
> borderSkin:
> ClassReference("mx.skins.spark.ContainerBorderSkin");
> borderStyle: "none";
> cornerRadius: 0;
> }
>
> You have added in MXRoyale default.css
>
> Container
> {
> IBeadView:
> ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.ContainerView");
> IBeadLayout:
>
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.layouts.BasicLayout");
> IViewport:
>
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.ScrollingViewport");
> IViewportModel:
>
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.html.beads.models.ViewportModel");
> }
>
> And mx:Application shows output.
>
> For Example :
>
> [1] Nothing in Output
> <s:Application xmlns:fx="
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=wolPG6Qeai1NzZbWXval1YIik5e4gLhO3l1IBfELySw%3D&reserved=0";
>
>
> xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
>
> xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%"
width =
> "100%"
> >
> <s:Button x="30" y="30"
> id="searchBtn" label="Search"/>
>
> </s:Application>
>
> [2] It shows Button in output file
> <mx:Application xmlns:fx="
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=wolPG6Qeai1NzZbWXval1YIik5e4gLhO3l1IBfELySw%3D&reserved=0";
>
>
> xmlns:s="library://ns.apache.org/royale/spark"
>
> xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" height = "100%"
width =
> "100%"
> >
> <s:Button x="30" y="30"
> id="searchBtn" label="Search"/>
>
> </mx:Application>
>
> How can I get Spark Application working as MX Application
?
>
> Thanks,
> Alina
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:04 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Again, I cannot help you as efficiently if you do not
provide
> important details.
>
> You are showing some part of the console for building the
> application. But did the compiler hang, or did it think it
finished? What
> does your build.xml look like? What was the full console output?
I would
> want to see what command you typed and all output up to and
including the
> command prompt after it finished. As I mentioned in prior
emails, use
> paste.apache.org if necessary for large quantities of console
output.
>
> From the one line you pasted below, it implied the build
did not
> finish, yet you are saying that you tried to run it and nothing
showed up.
> Why would you try to run it if the build did not finish? If the
build did
> finish, did you get the expected output files? If the build did
not
> finish, try stripping down what is in the Module until it works,
or compare
> the build.xml settings against
examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules.
>
> There are so many ways things can go wrong, especially
when
> developing new code. You must learn how to work efficiently in
these
> conditions.
>
> Another technique is to compare working against
non-working.
> Examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules is able to compile and load
modules.
> You can set breakpoints in the tourdeflexmodules code and follow
how it
> works and set breakpoints in similar places in your code and
follow how it
> works and compares.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/22/18, 1:12 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> This time I told you about folders hierarchy its same
as
> examples/royale/ModuleExample.
> js:UIModuleLoader is replaced with mx:ModuleLoader
url
> property is added in ModuleLoader and extra properties are
removed,
> js:UIModule is replaced with mx:Module
> js:Application is replaced with mx:Application
> namespace is replaced with mx namespace
>
> Console output stopped at :
> [mxmlc] 109142 bytes written to
>
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf
> in 3.220 seconds
>
> How else I can explain it in a better way.
> Simply I just want same working like
> examples/royale/ModuleExample with Mx Controls.
> I am not using TitleWindow in my current example.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:40 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> Again, half a world away, I cannot know what your
folder
> structure and build files look like, or what you tried or didn't
try. And
> now, I have to stop working and we missed an opportunity to help
you
> because the important information was not provided in your
earlier email.
> I wrote some techniques in this email:
>
>
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2Fe6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=kZxWYlxSYcUwjnadaRZLY86zOuszRX3ksgO%2FxlwsNlA%3D&reserved=0
>
> In your next email, I expect you see evidence that
you have
> understood and tried the techniques in the email I linked. You
will be
> expected to provide console output or information about the tree
of
> elements. And this might be a good opportunity for you to try
the debugger
> and set breakpoints in various places. Even if you don't
actually solve
> the problem you are facing, you are going to have to become an
expert in
> debugging JavaScript output from the Royale Compiler.
>
> Please reserve the time to write a really good email
with the
> important information and questions. It will save all of us time.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, "Alex Harui"
<aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> The key piece for modules is getting the output
in the
> right place. Flex/Flash has some interesting rules around how
URLs got
> loaded. I haven't found a practical way to replicate that in the
Browser,
> so for now, it is up to you to put the output where you are
telling
> ModuleLoader to load it.
>
> If you look at the Ant build.xml for
royale/ModuleExample,
> the Module/build.xml assumes the MainApp has been built first and
copies
> its output files into the MainApp's output folders.
>
> If you look at the build.xml for
> mxroyale/touredeflexexamples, it uses the -module-output compiler
option to
> redirect the output.
>
> If you look in the Browser console, I expect you
will see
> errors that it couldn’t find a particular JS file for the module.
Pay
> attention to the folders and adjust your build script to place
the output
> in the right place (or adjust where you tell ModuleLoader to find
the
> module.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/21/18, 11:22 PM, "Alina Kazi"
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Created an example contains two files :
> 1. Module.mxml
> <mx:Module xmlns:fx="
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=wolPG6Qeai1NzZbWXval1YIik5e4gLhO3l1IBfELySw%3D&reserved=0
> "
> xmlns:mx="library://
> ns.apache.org/royale/mx">
>
> <mx:Label text="This Label is in the
module" />
> <mx:TextInput id="ti" text="This
TextInput is also
> in the module" />
> </mx:Module>
>
> 2. MainApp.mxml
> <mx:Application xmlns:fx="
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906618784&sdata=wolPG6Qeai1NzZbWXval1YIik5e4gLhO3l1IBfELySw%3D&reserved=0
> "
> xmlns:mx="library://
> ns.apache.org/royale/mx" >
>
> <mx:Button label="Btn in Application" />
>
> <mx:ModuleLoader id = "ml1" x="30" y="30"
url =
> "Module.swf" />
>
> </mx:Application>
>
> No visual output shown . I want it to work
like
> examples\royale\ModuleExample
>
>
> Thanks in Advance ,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:33 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component
To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere.
>
> How has your company built the Flex app over
the past
> years? Is it all from an IDE or do you have some sort of script
or build
> tool?
>
> Whatever you are using to build the Flex app
should be
> translated to the Ant script. What is currently in the Ant
script you
> copied from tourdeflexmodules is custom designed for
tourdeflexmodules. It
> presumes lots of little applications that don't use custom
libraries.
>
> The mxmlc task in Ant is just like running
mxml from
> the command line or having an Application project in an IDE.
> The compc task in Ant is just like running
compc from
> the command line or having a Library project in an IDE.
>
> You can see from the build.xml files in the
> royale-asjs repo that we build SWCs by having a build.xml in each
library
> folder and calling them from a build.xml in a parent folder. You
might
> find that pattern useful.
>
> You will need to understand the -source-path
and
> -library-path and -external-library-path and other compiler
options that
> were used to build the Flex app and copy probably all of those
options into
> the right place in the Ant scripts.
>
> It would be uncommon to compile a file called
shmUtil
> with mxmlc. shmUtil sounds like a file in a library, not a
standalone
> application. I'll bet it comes from a library that should be
compiled with
> compc along with a lot of other files.
>
>
> If you are having trouble with Ant, also try
the
> command-line, then others may be able to help you see the
differences
> between your Ant script and what worked on the command-line. If
you use an
> IDE to build the Flex app, you will need to find out all of the
compiler
> options the IDE sets up for you. I think others can help you
with that as
> well.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Created a mxmlc task directly in
build.xml still
> an error is occured :
> Added to Build.xml :
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=d1sz5%2B9gxAXsQz0kPFjzQ9BYmFF8%2B6GDWZS0GXr0qV4%3D&reserved=0
> Error :
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=FndVg0jan15Kn8MPy0j2gy%2BW%2FZrOF0M19NfqFxQaRLY%3D&reserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:46 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To Run
>
> Hi Alina,
>
> The example in
> examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is working and accesses the
server
> that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp. Theoretically, your old
> mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched. Try it without
touching it and
> tell us what kinds of errors you are getting. If you are getting
runtime
> errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses "casting" to be
explicit about
> the types of the RemoteObject expressions. You'll see "as
Operation" to
> indicate that an mx:method in an mx:RemoteObject is an Operation.
>
> The compile-mxml macro is in the
build.xml file.
> It has certain expectations of the structure of the source files.
Your
> source files are likely have a different folder structure. You
will need
> to add source-paths and other compiler options to the macro, or
stop using
> the macro and call the mxmlc ant task directly. That is up to
you. This
> is a good opportunity to get to know Ant and the compiler better.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/18, 11:07 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex & Carlos,
> I haven't tested my ported
Application with
> server side functionality yet.
> Can you please share an Example that
I can
> follow to get my mx:RemoteObject working as FLEX.
>
> I have another question
>
> I am working on my Application and it
has two
> different directories like com->shm->modules->AP and
> com->shm->modules->components and I want to compile a file inside
> com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it uses a file inside
> com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml.
> I have added <compile-mxml
> folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" example=" abc"/> to build.xml.
> unable to access xyz inside abc.
>
> Like
>
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\
> VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using VideoPlayer.mxml in my case
> VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same directory.
>
> Thanks,
> Alina Kazi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:
> carlosrov...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26
AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To
> Run
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> yes, I added those classes when
worked trying
> to make it work in net RO, but I found a wall at that time. I
think DSK
> objects had a different code when deserialized, and our AMF
implementation
> was not able to handle that.
> I was not able to know how to deal
with that
> so I had to abandon. At least I could pass that disabling small
messages on
> BlazeDS.
>
> I don't think Small Messages are very
> important, don't know how "small"
> will be, so I think we can go to
other things
> more important. If I found some problem as I start to grow my
application
> that could be related to small messages I'll report. Hope not
find any issue
>
> The only drawback could be people
coming that
> must know they need to disable small messages on their BlazeDS.
>
> I think it will be more important
later since
> IExternalizable in itself seems an important addition.
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 20:21,
Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > The classes that represent DSK, DSA
and DSC
> are in the MXRoyale and
> > Network projects, but it looks like
they
> implement IExternalizable. I
> > don't see any evidence that the JS
AMF
> support currently handles
> > IExternalizable.
> >
> > I'm not clear on how important
SmallMessages
> and IExternalizable are.
> > If it isn't that important, there
are plenty
> of other things to work
> > on. If it is important, do we have
a test
> case that uses IExternalizable?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/18, 10:55 AM, "Carlos
Rovira" <
> carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes,
> >
> > I tried today (with code
> pre-callProperty, that I think does not make
> > difference for this).
> > There's small message support
in RPC
> classes, but when I looked at that
> > code when I investigate it, I
think must
> be accompanied from some AMF
> > serialization/deserialization
support. I
> couldn't find any resources on
> > this in the internet about how
to handle
> DSK, DSA or DSC. Maybe
> > you can ask
> > internally in Adobe how to deal
with
> that. My guess is that this
> > was added
> > to Flash plugin AMF
serialization
> capabilities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las
19:03, Alex
> Harui
> > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > >
> > > Have you verified that small
messages
> do not work with the MX
> > > RemoteObject? I thought I
saw Small
> Message support when I was
> > migrating
> > > the code.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 10:01 AM,
"Carlos Rovira"
> <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > just for if you don't
know. If you
> use BlazeDS Java server,
> > remember
> > > to set
> > > up small messages to
false, or you
> RemoteObjects will not work.
> > To get
> > > small messages we'll need
to
> upgrade AMF
> > serialization-deserialization
> > > to
> > > know how to handle DSK,
DSA, and
> DSC RemoteClass aliases.
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a
las 18:39,
> Alex Harui
> > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alina,
> > > >
> > > > Good to know. You (and
anybody
> working with the emulation
> > > components) are
> > > > expected to keep track
of the
> commits to the royale-compiler
> > as well
> > > as the
> > > > royale-asjs repos and
stay
> updated. We are still finding bugs
> > in the
> > > > transpiling that may
affect you.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 10/15/18, 2:17 AM,
"Alina
> Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot it
worked for
> me.
> > > >
> > > > -Alina kazi
> > > >
> > > > -----Original
Message-----
> > > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > Sent: Monday,
October 15,
> 2018 2:07 PM
> > > > To:
dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re:
Getting An
> Emulation Component To Run
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alina,
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure you
are using
> the latest compiler? Try
> > compiling
> > > >
> examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It compiles without
> > errors
> > > for me.
> > > >
> > > > I have to stop for
tonight.
> Hopefully others will help
> > you.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 10/15/18, 1:37
AM, "Alina
> Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > We are using MX
Remote
> Object in almost our every
> > Class like
> > > this:
> > > > <mx:RemoteObject
> > >
> channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}"
> > > > id="DataProviderService"
> showBusyCursor="true"
> > > >
> > > > destination="shmBasic"
> fault="handleFault(event);"
> > > >
> > > >
result="handleResult(event);" />
> > > > We get error
ASBlocker
> subsystem.
> > > > When we comment
> RemoteObject we need to comment methods
> > > those are
> > > > using it.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with
that if I
> will delete some code for
> > compilation
> > > I
> > > > will face other issues
at later
> stage.
> > > >
> > > > Can I replace
> mx:remoteObject with :
> > > > <s:RemoteObject
id="ro"
> endpoint="
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=jg3ierSRTFJaPtNbS7icw%2BWiXhm07dnd7XKitHFiGQo%3D&reserved=0
> > > "
> > > > destination="census"/>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in
Advance,
> > > > Alina Kazi
> > > >
> > > > -----Original
> Message-----
> > > > From: Alex
Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > Sent: Monday,
October
> 15, 2018 1:16 PM
> > > > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re:
Getting An
> Emulation Component To Run
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alina,
> > > >
> > > > I recommend
just running
> the compiled application and
> > fixing
> > > > problems as you run
into them.
> > > >
> > > > If you start
copying
> code and deleting other code, you
> > cannot
> > > > guarantee that the
results will
> run. I'm not even sure
> > TitleWindow
> > > is a
> > > > valid child control of
an
> Application. Usually it is a popup
> > dialog.
> > > >
> > > > When you run the
> application, you will probably find
> > > exceptions in
> > > > the console. Set a
breakpoint,
> see if you can figure out why
> > it is
> > > > generating an
exception. Change
> the code as needed.
> > > >
> > > > If you aren’t
getting
> exceptions, then look at the
> > element
> > > tree.
> > > > Either all of the
expected
> elements have been created or not.
> > If
> > > not, then
> > > > look at the innermost
element to
> see what it is. In the
> > properties
> > > for the
> > > > element is a
royale_wrapper
> property that points to the
> > transpiled
> > > AS3
> > > > class. That can help
you know
> what class didn't create its
> > children.
> > > > Check the _beads array
of that
> class to see if it created its
> > beads
> > > or
> > > > not. If not, check the
CSS for
> that element, or debug into
> > its code.
> > > > Usually, addedToParent
is where
> the view bead is added.
> > > >
> > > > If the elements
have
> been created, check the sizes.
> > Often
> > > some of
> > > > them will have width or
height =
> 0. Try to figure why it is
> > getting
> > > a bad
> > > > size.
> > > >
> > > > If you take this
> approach, then if you get stuck you
> > can ask
> > > a
> > > > much more specific
question and
> we can give you more specific
> > > answers.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately,
our days
> only overlap by a few hours,
> > but I
> > > hope
> > > > other committers can
help as
> well. It is in their best
> > interest to
> > > improve
> > > > their help and
debugging skills.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 10/15/18,
12:59 AM,
> "Alina Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > As our whole
> application is compiled successfully
> > without
> > > > error as a part of
SparkRoyale
> Library.
> > > >
> > > > Now, We
have created
> a project like
> > tourdeflexmodules to
> > > > compile and visually
see the
> application output.
> > > > Initially
started
> with the basic(small) file of our
> > > > application that is
used by most
> of the files of our
> > Application.
> > > >
> > > > We have a
file in
> our application "Picklist.mxml"
> > > > It was
actually like
> :
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=RNQ2LJja%2BgrzAYoKlT40CALpjWOo60dW5hT3LBQ%2BHX8%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > > we want to
see it
> visually as all our mx and spark
> > > controls
> > > > are already added in
Apache
> Royale.
> > > > Deleted
whole code
> accept visual controls from src
> > file :
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=z%2BLU54PZSvj8E%2Fi0oo%2FrU0Lzi7AnR8iq%2Fz%2FVZutPGT8%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > > Nothing
shows inside
> spark BorderContainer &
> > TitleWindow.
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=gaOyA37B3EJU24GKVQKZhvp6P8eG7amVAjp4Xy9uctE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > How can we
see all
> visual controls as they were in
> > Flex
> > > of
> > > > this particular file.
> > > > Even spark
> BorderContainer default.css is copied
> > from
> > > Flex
> > > > ->Royale.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Alina Kazi
> > > >
> > > >
-----Original
> Message-----
> > > > From: Alex
Harui
> [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > Sent:
Monday,
> October 15, 2018 11:15 AM
> > > > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > > > Subject:
Re: Getting
> An Emulation Component To Run
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alina,
> > > >
> > > > Different
APIs will
> have different solutions.
> > Pick an
> > > API you
> > > > want to have work and
let's
> discuss how to make it work.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On
10/14/18, 10:48
> PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > All mx
and spark
> class methods those were left
> > empty
> > > for
> > > > the compilation of
Application.
> > > > Also
Module does
> not show anything on screen.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
in
> Advance,
> > > > Alina
> > > >
> > > >
-----Original
> Message-----
> > > > From:
Alex Harui
> [mailto:
> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > > Sent:
Thursday,
> October 11, 2018 12:32 PM
> > > > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
> > > >
Subject: Re:
> Getting An Emulation Component To
> > Run
> > > >
> > > > Hi
Alina,
> > > >
> > > > Which
components
> or properties are you trying
> > to get
> > > to
> > > > run?
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On
10/10/18,
> 10:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> > > alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
Alex,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
What if CSS
> for a component is not written
> > in
> > > Basic /
> > > > Express defaults.css?
> > > >
> > > > And
We need
> it in MXRoyale / SparkRoyale
> > > >
> > > >
Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
Alina Kazi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
From: Alex
> Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > >
Sent:
> Monday, October 08, 2018 8:40 PM
> > > > To:
Alina
> Kazi
> > > >
Subject: Re:
> Getting An Emulation
> > Component To
> > > Run
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi
Alina,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
Please ask
> these questions on dev@ as
> > well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > CSS
with
> ClassReference is a way to use
> > > Composition to
> > > > customize components.
Copying
> code is usually a bad practice
> > as it
> > > > creates maintenance
issues. So,
> in general, the preference
> > should
> > > be to
> > > > use CSS.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > >
-Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
From: Alina
> Kazi <alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > >
Date:
> Monday, October 8, 2018 at 2:02 AM
> > > > To:
Alex
> Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> > > >
Subject:
> Getting An Emulation Component To
> > Run
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi
Alex,
> > > >
> > > > We
want to
> know how can we identify which
> > is the
> > > right
> > > > stub?
> > > >
> > > > For
Example:
> selected property written
> > > differently in
> > > > CheckBox, RadioButton
and
> > > >
> > > > we
want
> selected property for Button. How
> > can we
> > > > identify and pick the
right code
> for Button?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1.
> copying the little bits of code
> > from the
> > > > Basic or Express
version into
> the right stub in the Emulation
> > > Component
> > > >
> > > > 2.
> copying the CSS from Basic or
> > Express
> > > > defaults.css into the
MXRoyale
> or SparkRoyale defaults.css
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
Thanks in
> Advance,
> > > >
> > > >
Alina Kazi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=H53MC8zPRr%2FAycpAqzG%2BoIrZV0MsGlKqyQXb3MNOawo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.
> >
me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce
> >
>
40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367
> >
>
52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU
> > %3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=H53MC8zPRr%2FAycpAqzG%2BoIrZV0MsGlKqyQXb3MNOawo%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon:
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906628798&sdata=sP0sIvan93t412l21osLP1fol%2BYhXoNvBHvLHKJoy4w%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8040c84f11e24f5ca03d08d63d6b6b53%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636763928906638803&sdata=gEt1YdlAJwsFpkWnvI0RT6vnZ6xeu%2FaBjaGegsdDWbE%3D&reserved=0>*
