What are we modifying with the URI?
> On Dec 28, 2018, at 2:33 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's the sort of thing I was concerned about. XML does call
> QName.toString() but it doesn't seem to actually care too much about what
> comes back. In toXMLName it takes whatever name is and calls toString() on
> it. The QName.toString() is different between SWF and JS. It is only in JS
> that we modify the uri to be a valid JS property name. We used to use
> bracket syntax, but that's what ClosureCompiler is choking on.
>
> The question is what does someone do with myXML.name().toString()? Are they
> matching it up against a URI? They should be calling QName.match().
>
> I couldn't immediately think of a way for QName to know it is being used for
> XML vs other properties. We could create an XMLQName class for JS to return
> from name() that doesn't modify the URI.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/27/18, 1:04 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don’t think we’re using toString() anywhere ourselves, but what happens
> if someone has myXML.name().toString()? (Or an implicit cast) Will this break
> their Flash code?
>
>> On Dec 27, 2018, at 7:36 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Harbs,
>>
>> I just changed QName.toString() to match the new namespace format the
>> compiler is outputting in order to make Google Closure Compiler happy. Now
>> I'm wondering if QName.toString() is used in Royale XML.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>
>
>
