My latest improvements to the compiler should resolve these 5 issues with coercion.
- Josh On 2019/02/19 16:03:05, Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. b.moveTo(Number(path.pathPoints[0].anchor.x), > Number(path.pathPoints[0].anchor.y)); > > I have determined that the compiler is not correctly resolving the type of > pathPoints[0]. It should be PathPointVO because we're dealing with a Vector, > but it's being resolved as * instead, which is how regular Arrays are handled. > > I can see that this issue with resolving the type also affects code > intelligence in VSCode. Members of PathPointVO are not available in the > completion list for pathPoints[0]. > > I have checked Flash Builder, and the type of a Vector item seems to be known > because the correct completion items are suggested. Additionally, a compiler > error is created for the following code in Flash Builder, but not from Royale: > > var firstItem:SomeOtherType = pathPoints[0]; > > > Error: Implicit coercion of a value with static type PathPointVO to a > > possibly unrelated type SomeOtherType. > > This indicates to me that Adobe fixed this issue in ASC 2.0 after the > donation of "Falcon" to Apache, and we should do the same. > > Once the correct type is resolved here, there won't be any coercion emitted. > > 2. paragraph.setStyle("tabXML", > escape(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(para.tabXML.toXMLString()))); > > Confirmed. > > Interestingly, in VSCode, toXMLString() is provided in the completion list, > but hover and goto definition are not working on it. This indicates to me > that the compiler is not correctly resolving toXMLString(), so it's falling > back to * for the type. > > Also interestingly, Flash Builder provides hover for toXMLString(), but no > compiler error when assigning to another type. I suspect that XML is getting > special treatment in FB, and ASC 2.0 does not resolve the type of anything on > XML either. > > It looks like the emitter needs a special case for XML and I can manually > resolve certain types. There may be some logic for this already in one of the > emitters. I'll make sure that it works the same everywhere. > > 3. > doc.retrieveFile(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(file.attribute('loc').toString())); > > This is basically the same as 2. Lack of type resolution for XML. > > 4. stroke.setLineStyle(1, 65535, 1); > > This was a result of ensuring that numeric literals are emitted correctly for > integers. The value is the same, but it's just formatted a different way. I > think that I had the option of emitting the literal with a specific radix, so > I may be able to detect and preserve the 0x formatting. > > 5. > xml.setNodeKind(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(this.XML__nodeKind)); > > This looks to be the same as 2 and 3. Again, lack of type resolution for XML. > > - Josh > > On 2019/02/10 10:02:53, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > The commit seems to break some things for me. > > > > I’m working on finding the exact problem, but I’m noticing issues along the > > way: > > > > 1. > > In function: > > function drawPath(path:BezierPathVO,b:PathBuilder):void > > > > The following: > > b.moveTo(path.pathPoints[0].anchor.x,path.pathPoints[0].anchor.y); > > > > compiles to: > > b.moveTo(Number(path.pathPoints[0].anchor.x), > > Number(path.pathPoints[0].anchor.y)); > > > > pathPoints is of type Vector.<PathPointVO> > > and PathPointVO anchor is of type Point > > > > x and y should be inferrable that they are Numbers and it should compile > > unchanged. > > > > 2. > > paragraph.setStyle("tabXML", escape(para.tabXML.toXMLString())); > > > > Compiles to: > > paragraph.setStyle("tabXML", > > escape(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(para.tabXML.toXMLString()))); > > > > para.tabXML is typed as XML and toXMLString() should be recognizable as a > > String and Language.string() should not be called. > > > > 3. > > var file:XML = files[i]; > > doc.retrieveFile([email protected]()); > > > > Compiles to: > > doc.retrieveFile(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(file.attribute('loc').toString())); > > > > The compiler should know that toString() is a string and doesn’t need > > Language.string() > > > > 4. > > Another interesting change: > > stroke.setLineStyle(1,0x00FFFF,1); > > > > Now becomes: > > stroke.setLineStyle(1, 65535, 1); > > > > I’m not sure whether this is something we should be concerned about or not. > > > > 5. > > XML has many cases where you have something like this: > > xml.setNodeKind(_nodeKind); > > becomes > > xml.setNodeKind(org.apache.royale.utils.Language.string(this.XML__nodeKind)); > > > > Although everything is strings… > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:40 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > > > joshtynjala pushed a commit to branch develop > > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git > > > > > > commit fd7b81f4448db0f5eb70f22208c9144549cc4806 > > > Author: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> > > > AuthorDate: Wed Feb 6 08:36:10 2019 -0800 > > > > > > ParametersEmitter: fixed automatic type coercion and added some tests > > > (closes #74) > > > --- > > > .../js/jx/FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java | 10 +++++-- > > > .../codegen/js/royale/TestRoyaleExpressions.java | 34 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/compiler-jx/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/jx/FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java > > > > > > b/compiler-jx/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/jx/FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java > > > index 40b6302..c92f189 100644 > > > --- > > > a/compiler-jx/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/jx/FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java > > > +++ > > > b/compiler-jx/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/jx/FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java > > > @@ -61,17 +61,21 @@ public class FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter extends > > > JSSubEmitter implements > > > for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) > > > { > > > IExpressionNode argumentNode = (IExpressionNode) > > > node.getChild(i); > > > - IParameterDefinition paramDef = null; > > > + IDefinition paramTypeDef = null; > > > if (paramDefs != null && paramDefs.length > i) > > > { > > > - paramDef = paramDefs[i]; > > > + IParameterDefinition paramDef = paramDefs[i]; > > > if (paramDef.isRest()) > > > { > > > paramDef = null; > > > } > > > + if (paramDef != null) > > > + { > > > + paramTypeDef = paramDef.resolveType(getProject()); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > - getEmitter().emitAssignmentCoercion(argumentNode, paramDef); > > > + getEmitter().emitAssignmentCoercion(argumentNode, > > > paramTypeDef); > > > > > > if (i < len - 1) > > > { > > > diff --git > > > a/compiler-jx/src/test/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/royale/TestRoyaleExpressions.java > > > > > > b/compiler-jx/src/test/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/royale/TestRoyaleExpressions.java > > > index 93db140..56b6363 100644 > > > --- > > > a/compiler-jx/src/test/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/royale/TestRoyaleExpressions.java > > > +++ > > > b/compiler-jx/src/test/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/internal/codegen/js/royale/TestRoyaleExpressions.java > > > @@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ public class TestRoyaleExpressions extends > > > TestGoogExpressions > > > @Test > > > public void testVisitCallFunctionReturnedFromFunction() > > > { > > > - IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > foo(a:String, b:String):Function { return null }; return foo(3, 4)(1, > > > 2);", > > > + IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > foo(a:int, b:int):Function { return null }; return foo(3, 4)(1, 2);", > > > > > > IFunctionCallNode.class); > > > asBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(node); > > > assertOut("foo(3, 4)(1, 2)"); > > > @@ -1571,6 +1571,38 @@ public class TestRoyaleExpressions extends > > > TestGoogExpressions > > > assertOut("return 4294967173"); > > > } > > > > > > + @Test > > > + public void testVisitFunctionCallWithIntParameterNegative() > > > + { > > > + IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > a(foo:int):void {}; a(-123)", IFunctionCallNode.class); > > > + asBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(node); > > > + assertOut("a(-123)"); > > > + } > > > + > > > + @Test > > > + public void testVisitFunctionCallWithIntParameterDecimal() > > > + { > > > + IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > a(foo:int):void {}; a(123.4)", IFunctionCallNode.class); > > > + asBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(node); > > > + assertOut("a(123)"); > > > + } > > > + > > > + @Test > > > + public void testVisitFunctionCallWithUintParameterNegative() > > > + { > > > + IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > a(foo:uint):void {}; a(-123)", IFunctionCallNode.class); > > > + asBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(node); > > > + assertOut("a(4294967173)"); > > > + } > > > + > > > + @Test > > > + public void testVisitFunctionCallWithUintParameterDecimal() > > > + { > > > + IFunctionCallNode node = (IFunctionCallNode) getNode("function > > > a(foo:uint):void {}; a(123.4)", IFunctionCallNode.class); > > > + asBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(node); > > > + assertOut("a(123)"); > > > + } > > > + > > > protected IBackend createBackend() > > > { > > > return new RoyaleBackend(); > > > > > > > >
