Hi Alex,

I'm sorry to say that with != null now my app fails silently without report
any error. The first attempt to login don't do nothing
Reverting back to != undefined works. So I think there's some bug that's
affecting this. I switch back again until we found a solution

El mié., 20 mar. 2019 a las 19:33, Carlos Rovira (<carlosrov...@apache.org>)
escribió:

> Hi Alex,
>
> thanks for explaining, I thought that was different. I'll change to != null
>
>
> El mié., 20 mar. 2019 a las 18:57, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> AIUI, both AS on Flash and JS in the browser handle "!=" (and not "!==")
>> the same, which is that whether an property is undefined or null, the "!="
>> test will return true.  The advantage of "!=" is that in Flash (and maybe
>> future browser runtimes or other runtimes) all properties that are defined
>> to have a value (of null in Flash), so this single test works without
>> having to resort to use ["propName"] to work around the fact that only '*'
>> types can have undefined as a value.
>>
>> I would expect there are lots of tests for "!= null" in the Royale
>> framework code and fewer places were folks test against "undefined".
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 3/20/19, 10:43 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Alex,
>>
>>     the problem is that msg is an Object and headers is not coming so is
>>     undefined, not null, and the property doesn't exits.
>>     So if I understand right the right way would be to check !=
>> undefined. If
>>     in this scenario I could change for != null I can do it, but I tough
>> is not
>>     valid
>>
>>
>>     El mié., 20 mar. 2019 a las 16:37, Alex Harui
>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
>>     escribió:
>>
>>     > Hi Carlos,
>>     >
>>     > I  guess that’s ok, but I expected you would just test for “!=
>> null”.  Is
>>     > null an allowed value with a different meaning than undefined?
>>     >
>>     > -Alex
>>     >
>>     > From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>     > Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 2:44 AM
>>     > To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <dev@royale.apache.org>, Alex Harui <
>>     > aha...@adobe.com>
>>     > Subject: Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: amfchannel:
>> ensure
>>     > headers are not undefined, this is needed in shared enviroments
>> when the
>>     > application can be hosted in a domain but served through other
>> domain. In
>>     > this cases interacting with AMF can produce ...
>>     >
>>     > Hi Alex, you're right. I committed a different notation that removes
>>     > warnings. Let me know if is ok for you.
>>     > thanks
>>     >
>>     > El mié., 20 mar. 2019 a las 1:49, Alex Harui
>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
>>     > escribió:
>>     > Carlos,
>>     >
>>     > This change is causing warnings.  Are you not getting the same
>> warnings?
>>     >
>>     > -Alex
>>     >
>>     >
>> frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as(549):
>>     > col: 21 Illogical comparison with undefined.  Only untyped
>> variables (or
>>     > variables of type *) can be undefined.
>>     >
>>     >
>> frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as(545):
>>     > col: 62 Illogical comparison with undefined.  Only untyped
>> variables (or
>>     > variables of type *) can be undefined.
>>     >
>>     > On 3/19/19, 10:37 AM, "carlosrov...@apache.org<mailto:
>>     > carlosrov...@apache.org>" <carlosrov...@apache.org<mailto:
>>     > carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git
>> repository.
>>     >
>>     >     carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
>>     >     in repository
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-asjs.git&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C664fa82003604b7381ef08d6ad5b8967%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636887005995756156&amp;sdata=%2FCN8kEawGX0xcemd%2BQzrTgj6UOSVfzQ8E7%2F%2BAHAL%2B9M%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > <
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-asjs.git&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C664fa82003604b7381ef08d6ad5b8967%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636887005995756156&amp;sdata=%2FCN8kEawGX0xcemd%2BQzrTgj6UOSVfzQ8E7%2F%2BAHAL%2B9M%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >     The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by
>> this push:
>>     >          new 9efd0d4  amfchannel: ensure headers are not undefined,
>> this
>>     > is needed in shared enviroments when the application can be hosted
>> in a
>>     > domain but served through other domain. In this cases interacting
>> with AMF
>>     > can produce access denied (401) errors that can generate messages
>> without
>>     > headers, but we still want Royale executes its faulhandler
>>     >     9efd0d4 is described below
>>     >
>>     >     commit 9efd0d41ef153025d20447362ec1b66c1889303c
>>     >     Author: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org<mailto:
>>     > carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>     >     AuthorDate: Tue Mar 19 18:36:56 2019 +0100
>>     >
>>     >         amfchannel: ensure headers are not undefined, this is
>> needed in
>>     > shared enviroments when the application can be hosted in a domain
>> but
>>     > served through other domain. In this cases interacting with AMF can
>> produce
>>     > access denied (401) errors that can generate messages without
>> headers, but
>>     > we still want Royale executes its faulhandler
>>     >     ---
>>     >
>> .../MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as
>>     > | 4 ++--
>>     >      1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>     >
>>     >     diff --git
>>     >
>> a/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as
>>     >
>> b/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as
>>     >     index 8803f6b..3938a04 100644
>>     >     ---
>>     >
>> a/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as
>>     >     +++
>>     >
>> b/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/messaging/channels/AMFChannel.as
>>     >     @@ -542,11 +542,11 @@ public class AMFChannel extends
>>     > NetConnectionChannel
>>     >                      _log.debug("'{0}' fault handler called. {1}",
>> id,
>>     > msg.toString());
>>     >
>>     >                      // Set the server assigned RoyaleClient Id.
>>     >     -                if (RoyaleClient.getInstance().id == null &&
>>     > msg.headers[AbstractMessage.FLEX_CLIENT_ID_HEADER] != null)
>>     >     +                if (RoyaleClient.getInstance().id == null &&
>>     > msg.headers != undefined &&
>>     > msg.headers[AbstractMessage.FLEX_CLIENT_ID_HEADER] != null)
>>     >                          RoyaleClient.getInstance().id =
>>     > msg.headers[AbstractMessage.FLEX_CLIENT_ID_HEADER];
>>     >
>>     >                      // Process the features advertised by the
>> server
>>     > endpoint.
>>     >     -                if
>> (msg.headers[CommandMessage.MESSAGING_VERSION] !=
>>     > null)
>>     >     +                if (msg.headers != undefined &&
>>     > msg.headers[CommandMessage.MESSAGING_VERSION] != null)
>>     >                      {
>>     >                          var serverVersion:Number =
>>     > msg.headers[CommandMessage.MESSAGING_VERSION] as Number;
>>     >
>> handleServerMessagingVersion(serverVersion);
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > --
>>     > Carlos Rovira
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C664fa82003604b7381ef08d6ad5b8967%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636887005995756156&amp;sdata=kGjJwZebC%2F6LqO%2FqRmhKQTEePxrwPiDsNrvPUWK1Rrs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> <
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C664fa82003604b7381ef08d6ad5b8967%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636887005995756156&amp;sdata=kGjJwZebC%2F6LqO%2FqRmhKQTEePxrwPiDsNrvPUWK1Rrs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > >
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>     --
>>     Carlos Rovira
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C664fa82003604b7381ef08d6ad5b8967%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636887005995756156&amp;sdata=kGjJwZebC%2F6LqO%2FqRmhKQTEePxrwPiDsNrvPUWK1Rrs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to