Hi Yishay, No I don't think so. I think you can use some filtering options in a replacer function in conjunction with stringify. AMF has something similar for filtering or altering dynamic properties.
The longer term solution for this is to have a better implementation for namespaces, and to make private members non-enumerable for example, imo. But I think using a replacer function with some checks against reflection data would probably be best for now. Maybe there is already something for that - I know Alex has done some work on JSON serialization already. On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:51 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > I’m referring to Olaf’s issue [1] with JSON.stringify() using the > qualified property names. Could a class alias change the qualification > prefix? > > > > [1] > http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/Plain-public-variables-complain-they-don-t-have-getters-setters-Was-CreationComplete-event-question-tp9337p9353.html > > > > ________________________________ > From: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 8:28:18 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Plain public variables complain they don't have getters / > setters (Was "CreationComplete event question") > > 'I’m wondering if registerClassAlias or the RemoteClass meta-tag would > solve this. Anyone know?' > > The issue with public car renaming? > > I can't see how it could. > But reflection classes now support it (you can get and set public var > values in release mode via reflection) and AMF works with public vars too. > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, 07:20 Yishay Weiss, <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > I’m wondering if registerClassAlias or the RemoteClass meta-tag would > > solve this. Anyone know? > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 3:03:46 PM > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Plain public variables complain they don't have getters / > > setters (Was "CreationComplete event question") > > > > FWIW, I use a method to convert classes to JSON which allows me to define > > exactly which properties get written and using what names. > > > > i.e. myFoo.toData() > > > > > On Mar 28, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> > wrote: > > > > > > I would just like to mention that resolving this "public vars" issue by > > > replacing the public by private vars with getters/setters has a side > > effect: > > > JSON.stringify() stringifies all getters with the entire package name > > which > > > makes the JSON representation unusable [1]. > > > > > > [1] > > > package com.mydomain.myapp.model.vo > > > { > > > public class MyVO > > > { > > > private var _foo:String = "bar"; > > > > > > public function get foo():String > > > { > > > return this._foo; > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > Becomes: > > > { > > > "com.mydomain.myapp.model.vo.foo":"bar"; > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/ > > > > >
