I don’t know how they do it, but it seems pretty straight-forward:
1. The compiler reads the binary file.
2. It Base64 encodes the content. 
https://www.baeldung.com/java-base64-encode-and-decode 
<https://www.baeldung.com/java-base64-encode-and-decode>
3. It writes the src or background using the Base64 string. That could be 
either in CSS or in code.
Details on data uris here: https://css-tricks.com/data-uris/ 
<https://css-tricks.com/data-uris/>

Harbs

> On Jun 7, 2019, at 12:12 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> ok Om thanks for sharing.
> Do you have some url with some code to see an example of how they do it?
> thanks
> 
> El jue., 6 jun. 2019 a las 19:05, OmPrakash Muppirala (<bigosma...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
> 
>> In recent applications using React/Webpack, I have seen defaults of using
>> base64 embedding of files less than 10k in size.
>> 
>> I guess the tradeoff is in between firing off several http requests for
>> small files vs embedding them is a less efficient format.
>> 
>> I think a similar strategy would work for Royale.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019, 3:32 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I think in the case of HTML, does not have sense to me the concept of
>> Embed
>>> like in Flex. Maybe of SWF target or others (don't know if WebAsm could
>>> benefit from something like this)
>>> Maybe for HTML use something like Embed metadata, could just copy the
>>> assets to the resources folder to be available, since like Alex said, a
>>> request per asset is needed and making other kind of big file seems
>> strange
>>> in this case (maybe not). Although we have solved the copying of assets
>> in
>>> different ways through compiler for libraries and ANT/MAVEN automation in
>>> Application.
>>> 
>>> for me this could be something to investigate in the future, but with low
>>> priority, since I think we still have bigger fish to fry
>>> 
>>> just my 2...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> El mié., 5 jun. 2019 a las 18:07, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>> )
>>> escribió:
>>> 
>>>> Regarding embedded assets in Royale:
>>>> 
>>>> There is no embedded asset support at this time because it is not
>> obvious
>>>> to me it will be worth it.  We need a volunteer to devise a strategy
>> that
>>>> works and implement it.
>>>> 
>>>> In Flex/Flash, my understanding is that folks embedded assets to save
>> on
>>>> server requests for assets like images.  That makes sense because,
>> since
>>> a
>>>> SWF is a compressed binary and most assets are compressed binaries, you
>>> can
>>>> essentially append the assets to the SWF.
>>>> 
>>>> However, for Royale in the browser, every implementation of "embedding"
>>>> I've seen seems to Base64 encode the asset, converting it to text and
>>>> increasing the number of bytes.  And the resulting Base64 bytes may
>>>> deteriorate the gzip compression of the .html file.
>>>> 
>>>> Flash also had frames in the SWF and assets could be embedded on later
>>>> frames allowing a download progress bar to show up before all of the
>> rest
>>>> of the SWF is downloaded.  I don't know what the equivalent for that is
>>>> without Flash.
>>>> 
>>>> I believe another advantage of embedding in Flash was that the asset
>> was
>>>> ready to be instantiated and placed on the display list right away.
>> I'm
>>>> not clear that an embedded Base64 image can be used in an <img> tag and
>>>> prevent "popping" given that Royale generates the <img> tags
>> dynamically.
>>>> 
>>>> So, we need a volunteer to create some examples of how to use browser
>>>> embedding in dynamically generated <img> tags so we can see if there
>> will
>>>> be any benefit or not.  And if not, possibly explore other options,
>> such
>>> as
>>>> delivering all assets in one true binary blob somehow.
>>>> 
>>>> HTH,
>>>> -Alex
>>>> 
>>>> On 6/5/19, 7:05 AM, "Frost, Andrew" <andrew.fr...@harman.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>    Yes, me :-)
>>>> 
>>>>    I'm pushing Royale internally, I think it has a lot of promise -
>>>> although I still do find it a little frustrating at times internally!
>> In
>>>> terms of what support you can give, the sorts of things you're already
>>>> doing are great, but yes it might mean we lean a little more on this
>>>> mailing list if we're facing tricky issues.
>>>> 
>>>>    We have one sales case in particular at the moment which has the
>>>> potential to be very big, we're hoping they move forwards with a proof
>> of
>>>> concept project which would take a small part of their app and port
>> this
>>> to
>>>> Royale. A few issues we've found so far from investigations:
>>>>    - their flex code is embedding icons that are contained within a
>> SWF.
>>>> Royale compiler didn't seem to like this, not sure whether it's just
>>> syntax
>>>> or whether we need to pull all the assets out (not a big job, we can
>>>> automate that..)
>>>>    - they have binding using functions e.g.
>>>> text="{localizationHelper.getString('fieldName')}", which caused an
>> issue
>>>> when generating the JavaScript code as the string-within-a-string
>> seemed
>>> to
>>>> upset the parser. We can look at this later perhaps though..
>>>>    - when we got it compiling, the main thing was with responsiveness
>>>> i.e. trying to get the app to resize and for all the internal elements
>> to
>>>> then resize. We may use the MX emulation classes for this but it still
>>>> looked like more support is needed - although we only looked briefly at
>>>> this.
>>>> 
>>>>    Once those issues are sorted though, we would have one big task (to
>>>> recreate a very advanced data grid control that they'd developed in
>>>> Flex/Flash) and a lot of the rest - around the AS3 logic - should fall
>>> into
>>>> place! I'm hoping we can convince them to go with this solution..
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    thanks
>>>> 
>>>>       Andrew
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    -----Original Message-----
>>>>    From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
>>>>    Sent: 04 June 2019 14:41
>>>>    To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>>>    Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: AIR and Royale
>>>> 
>>>>    Well to start with: Does anyone know anyone working for them?
>>>> 
>>>>    I’d like to hear from them what it would take for them to push
>> Royale
>>>> more.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 4, 2019, at 4:10 PM, Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> what's the kind of support you're thinking ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> El mar., 4 jun. 2019 a las 9:36, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>> (<piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
>>>>> escribió:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was exactly think the same about that, so I'm keeping finger
>>>>>> crossed to that effort.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wt., 4 cze 2019 o 09:34 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I just heard about this announcement.[1]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I went over to the Harman site and was reading this page.[2]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was particularly struck by this statement:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> HARMAN’s offerings also include consultancy, support and
>>> migration
>>>>>>> services for companies looking to move their applications away
>>>> from
>>>>>>> Flash technologies over to HTML5 via solutions such as Angular,
>>>>>>> Apache Royale
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> other JavaScript based frameworks.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Considering that they mention Royale explicitly as the number 2
>>>>>> framework,
>>>>>>> I’m guessing they will be pushing Royale to a certain degree.
>> We
>>>>>>> should probably look to support that effort.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3L9wbF4uCYccj7EQCUBeXbp7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171832330&amp;sdata=XSKi6AAdovaj5CSqDxp4JKUXM%2Fu5uTzKYfJhrsWjO4s%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Ftheblog.adobe.com%2Fthe-future-of-adobe-air%2F <
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3L9wbF4uCYccj7EQCUBeXbp7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps%253A&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=7Cp77z%2FW16Gf%2B9Q8P0%2Fs7qOBZdGYOh71F0bX%2BYLwXp8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>> %2F%2Ftheblog.adobe.com%2Fthe-future-of-adobe-air%2F>
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F36DC33RH3RXctPTGAK4XztY7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=WmyyWadQQ1saSrBkTeuYmPiM0vDW49J3Lob%2BC7eejfg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fservices.harman.com%2Fpartners%2Fadobe <
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F36DC33RH3RXctPTGAK4XztY7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps%253A&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=JGO%2Fg99Iey8nKvQN5Hzd2EmXkle35QSllbc5UyDaj%2FE%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>> %2F%2Fservices.harman.com%2Fpartners%2Fadobe>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Patreon:
>>>>>> *
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F32dvoAS1WTaQP1E2yQmx5pn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps%253A&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=%2FDiwRHFQCxdxO7pjeV85svwoRoI8nZmWpWBKDNgzr3w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>> %2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki
>>>>>> <
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F32dvoAS1WTaQP1E2yQmx5pn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttps%253A&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=%2FDiwRHFQCxdxO7pjeV85svwoRoI8nZmWpWBKDNgzr3w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>> %2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki>*
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3Peb7VMJWFagYLtTD2HSBGD7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c133b6b710344d4bf3f08d6e9bed52a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636953403171842325&amp;sdata=PE5%2FahFsZHO5iuUE9pbP3jnax2KYXkxJBvBS%2Bfxb22Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> %2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to