Hi Alex,

in this concrete use case (a basic module scenario), I can confirm a
preloader is not necessary, since I tested the code and it works fine.
My problem is different. I want the user to avoid a call to loadCSS, since
just using the MaterialIconType Royale should add implicitly the link tag
to head.

I'm sure that a preloader will be needed more more complex scenarios, but I
think that should be other blog post that address that. For now, I'm just
trying to do the first and most basic one.



El jue., 27 jun. 2019 a las 9:29, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> I'm pretty sure in related threads I mentioned that a preloader is needed.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/26/19, 8:16 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Spiros,
>
>     My real problem is the following. I'm trying to improve Modules. I
> found
>     that inject_html don't work with modules, Inject_html is processed by
>     compiler. To solve in an easy way I'm trying to load CSS and JS with
>     javascript appending to head.
>
>     When I load the module and I use a class that needs to attach some JS,
> I
>     want to run a function like "loadJavascript"
>
>     I created as well "loadCSS" (still not commited).
>
>     The real use case I'm trying is to use MaterialIconType, that was using
>     inject_html. I removed the inject_html directive,
>     then added
>
>     loadCSS('
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffonts.googleapis.com%2Ficon%3Ffamily%3DMaterial%2BIcons&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C25b97d52ac98496b4e9a08d6fa49476e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636971590001069684&amp;sdata=5KVxS4gVhXKdEWWOyG3xmHXTPKNV70OPkE7bCZsYn0g%3D&amp;reserved=0'
> );
>
>     in the constructor
>
>     then in my real module I want just to use as always
>
>     <js:FontIcon text="{MaterialIconType.SEARCH}" material="true"/>
>
>     accesing this way does not run the constructor, so the loadCSS code
> does
>     not run :(
>
>
>     We have hundreds of public static vars like
>
>     public static const SEARCH:String = 'search';
>
>     So I think the current way you propose, although valid, will not be the
>     best here, since will means lots of lines of code.
>
>     But thanks for your suggestion
>
>     Hope others could give as well some ideas on how to solve this
>
>     thanks
>
>
>
>     El mié., 26 jun. 2019 a las 17:05, spiros (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
>     > It is possible with static getter and seter.
>     >
>     > Maybe will help you the code below
>     >
>     > Spiros.
>     >
>     > public class Variable
>     >         {
>     >
>     >                 private static var _textData:String;
>     >
>     >                 public static function get textData():String
>     >                 {
>     >                         if( _textData ==null)
>     >                         {
>     >                                 initailizeVariable();
>     >                         }
>     >                         return _textData;
>     >                 }
>     >
>     >                 public static function set
> textData(value:String):void
>     >                 {
>     >                         _textData = value;
>     >                 }
>     >
>     >                 public static function initailizeVariable():void
>     >                 {
>     >                         _textData = "The quick brown fox jump over
> the
>     > lazy dog.";
>     >                 }
>     >
>     >
>     >                 public function Variable()
>     >                 {
>     >                 }
>     >         }
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]]
>     > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:49 PM
>     > To: [email protected]
>     > Subject: Trying to run a function on a class that is not instantiated
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > I need to run a function when I access a public static var in a
> class.
>     > Trying to run the function in the constructor seems not to work since
>     > there's no instance of that class. Do we have some way to do this?
>     >
>     > --
>     > Carlos Rovira
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C25b97d52ac98496b4e9a08d6fa49476e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636971590001079678&amp;sdata=kd8i%2FuPoxvRf9f%2FLW2DSgk6yvnBdtgKtRkP%2BeRIj%2FWs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C25b97d52ac98496b4e9a08d6fa49476e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636971590001079678&amp;sdata=kd8i%2FuPoxvRf9f%2FLW2DSgk6yvnBdtgKtRkP%2BeRIj%2FWs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to