I'm trying to understand part of the script which is responsible for upload
it is for example in compiler: Release_Step_003_Upload
My folder contains:
- artifacts folder
- sources folder
Now you are launching command:
"><exec executable="${mvn}" dir="${artifactfolder}/sources" failonerror="
true" >
<arg value="wagon:upload" />
<arg value="-X" />
<arg value="
-Dwagon.fromDir=${artifactfolder}/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir"
/>
<arg value="-P" />
<arg value="upload-release-to-staging,-main" />
</exec>
pom.xml is being taken from sources to process that stuff. Next fromDir is
being setup let's say like that ->
d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\
- It contains pom.xml
When you next setup fromDir it will take current directory +
${artifactfolder}/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir.
Is it bug or am I doing something wrong ?
śr., 14 sie 2019 o 10:14 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
napisał(a):
> If your folder with artifacts is in ~/temp/releasesteps - What do you
> type when script asking you about ?
>
> get-artifact-folder:
> [input] Enter the temporary folder to store the downloaded artifacts:
>
> wt., 13 sie 2019 o 22:20 Alex Harui <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>
>> I'm not sure you should skip the uploading. I'm not sure where typedefs
>> and asjs will get its compiler artifacts if they haven't been uploaded.
>>
>> The output says that it is looking in the following folder for artifacts:
>>
>>
>> d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\royale096\artifacts\archive\target\checkout\release-dir
>>
>> For me, my temp folder is:
>>
>> ~/temp/releasesteps
>>
>> And the artifacts are in:
>>
>> artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir
>>
>> There seems to be another level in there for you (sources\royale096).
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 8/13/19, 11:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps
>> for
>> signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
>>
>> When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried
>> upload it using provided instructions.
>>
>> If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand
>> more
>> why actually upload wasn't triggered.
>>
>> Artifacts were definitely generated correctly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to.
>> >
>> > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using
>> Maven's
>> > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder. Are there
>> jars in
>> > that folder (or its subfolders)? Examine the output of the
>> previous Ant
>> > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built
>> correctly and
>> > binary matched. If the previous steps were successful then the
>> upload
>> > should be picking up those artifacts.
>> >
>> > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but
>> now are
>> > saying you never got past step 3.
>> >
>> > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your
>> working
>> > copy. It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder
>> outside
>> > of your working copy. Find a good place to add that to the wiki
>> > instructions.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I
>> reached
>> > point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep
>> saying me
>> > that
>> > there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at
>> the
>> > beginnings ? [1]
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110163174&sdata=4hzhaPPkBXhC4ACCdnZ1GEym6MRSVVsIhisRLT8vvjs%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> > pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <[email protected]>
>> > napisał(a):
>> >
>> > > Getting back to this.
>> > >
>> > > You can start a vote on the results. If we get this process
>> > working, it
>> > > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well
>> so we
>> > will
>> > > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if
>> someone's
>> > recent
>> > > changes made it into the RC or not.
>> > >
>> > > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being
>> > created
>> > > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and
>> ask the
>> > RM to
>> > > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the
>> develop
>> > > branch.
>> > >
>> > > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24
>> both
>> > show
>> > > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid. As
>> you can
>> > see from
>> > > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation
>> is
>> > that the
>> > > string you enter conforms to the Java format of:
>> > >
>> > > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>> > >
>> > > The documentation for this format is in the Java
>> documentation. As I
>> > > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and
>> you must
>> > supply
>> > > one. It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one
>> I'm
>> > in, but
>> > > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and
>> improve
>> > > documentation of the process. In your most recent attempt,
>> you did
>> > not
>> > > specify a timezone. In the one prior, you did not supply a
>> year or
>> > a space
>> > > between date and hour. Please update the documentation or the
>> > instructions
>> > > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be
>> > accurate in
>> > > specifying the date.
>> > >
>> > > HTH,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and
>> start RC1
>> > vote
>> > > on
>> > > dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not
>> > mention ?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should
>> look
>> > into
>> > > Jenkins
>> > > > configuration of that steps or something else ?
>> > > >
>> > > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui
>> <[email protected]>
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi Piotr,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> You can compare the output from previous builds and
>> also the
>> > > typedefs
>> > > >> build configuration because both successfully used the
>> date
>> > > format. The
>> > > >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone. It
>> > shouldn't
>> > > matter
>> > > >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't
>> specified
>> > one at
>> > > all.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped
>> around
>> > the date.
>> > > >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to
>> see why
>> > that's
>> > > >> happening.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> HTH,
>> > > >> -Alex
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > [email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Hi Alex,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I was able to overcome issue with date for
>> typedefs.
>> > Instruction
>> > > >> there is
>> > > >> saying:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>> > > >> > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and
>> HH:MM is a
>> > faked
>> > > time to
>> > > >> > encode the release version such as:
>> > > >> > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what
>> was
>> > that) and
>> > > -0800
>> > > >> - This
>> > > >> part I completely do not understand - what is for
>> there
>> > minus ?
>> > > Can
>> > > >> you
>> > > >> send exact example of what I should put there ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> What's more I have went trough forward and in steps
>> > related to
>> > > >> royale-asjs
>> > > >> I see that typing either
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an
>> > exception
>> > > with
>> > > >> following
>> > > >> message:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [INFO] COMPC
>> > > >> [INFO] Loading configuration:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml
>> > > >> [INFO]
>> > > >> [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date:
>> > ""7/24/19
>> > > 9:06""
>> > > >> [INFO] at
>> > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
>> > > >> [INFO] at
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330)
>> > > >> [INFO] at
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It looks like there are some additional
>> parentheses -
>> > Maybe
>> > > it's an
>> > > >> issue.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Piotr
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > > >> napisał(a):
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Hi Piotr,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > What differences did you see? I downloaded the
>> two
>> > SWCs and
>> > > the
>> > > >> only
>> > > >> > difference I saw was the timestamps in the
>> catalog.xml
>> > in the
>> > > SWCs.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter
>> in Step
>> > 005.
>> > > The
>> > > >> log
>> > > >> > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so
>> maybe
>> > that's
>> > > why
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> > timestamps are not matching up. Please update
>> the
>> > > instructions so
>> > > >> that
>> > > >> > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone.
>> The
>> > example
>> > > >> pattern that
>> > > >> > Jenkins should show should include a timezone.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > You will have to remove the tag and revert any
>> commits
>> > from
>> > > steps
>> > > >> 5, 6,
>> > > >> > and 7 before re-running step 5.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > HTH,
>> > > >> > -Alex
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > [email protected]>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Hi Alex,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 -
>> > related to
>> > > >> typedefs during
>> > > >> > build on my local machine I got mismatch
>> error [1].
>> > What
>> > > could
>> > > >> actually
>> > > >> > happen? I did compare some files inside
>> those two
>> > swc and
>> > > they
>> > > >> are
>> > > >> > indeed
>> > > >> > different - I have used Total Command to
>> compare
>> > them.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > When I'm starting steps related to typedefs
>> - first
>> > step
>> > > >> actually
>> > > >> > checkout
>> > > >> > fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins
>> > checkout
>> > > them
>> > > >> earlier
>> > > >> > when I
>> > > >> > started one of the step before typedefs
>> steps? This
>> > those
>> > > 2
>> > > >> files [2]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [1]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=%2Ba9NxCNjcO08f8ZbgePErL1SZvxaD6lpSn6DsQbr8Ik%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > [2]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=ClD%2BCcEcZ1%2BzRznkEpiECFV7x%2FYjwVKxUs3%2Bcp9Fay0%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > >> > Piotr
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui
>> > > <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > napisał(a):
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Hi Piotr,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > The email with the subject "Release Step
>> 003
>> > Succeeded"
>> > > says:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars
>> > > (compiler-jburg-types
>> > > >> and
>> > > >> > > compiler-build-tools), Run:
>> > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
>> > -Dutils=true
>> > > >> > > -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > It looks like you are not using the
>> -Dutils=true.
>> > > Please
>> > > >> improve the
>> > > >> > > email so future RMs will not miss that
>> parameter.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > -Alex
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> > > >> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Hi Alex,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > I have made adjustment to
>> documentation. I'm
>> > on
>> > > step 3
>> > > >> where I
>> > > >> > need
>> > > >> > > build
>> > > >> > > on my end sources. I have run on my PC
>> this:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml
>> Release_Step_003
>> > > >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > It downloads sources and maven
>> artifacts, but
>> > it
>> > > also
>> > > >> tried
>> > > >> > build them
>> > > >> > > automatically as I understa. I got
>> error [1]
>> > - it
>> > > >> understandable
>> > > >> > cause
>> > > >> > > there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types.
>> > Should I on
>> > > my
>> > > >> own build
>> > > >> > > first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0
>> to have
>> > stuff
>> > > in
>> > > >> local
>> > > >> > cache or
>> > > >> > > should I made something else ?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > [1]
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=4dlbh3xDClPiFNz%2BIYPy2X8QQvAsVuAaIUcuKZZVcSw%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > Piotr
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui
>> > > >> <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > > napisał(a):
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > Please update the wiki in a way that
>> the
>> > next
>> > > person
>> > > >> will know
>> > > >> > which
>> > > >> > > 2FA
>> > > >> > > > token to use.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > -Alex
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr
>> Zarzycki" <
>> > > >> > [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > So far so good. I'm on a step 3,
>> where
>> > I need
>> > > build
>> > > >> > artifacts on
>> > > >> > > my
>> > > >> > > > sight
>> > > >> > > > and compare them with what
>> Jenkins
>> > produce.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I will get back to that probably
>> on
>> > Monday.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
>> Piotr
>> > Zarzycki <
>> > > >> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Hi Alex,
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Thanks it's working. I'm moving
>> > forward
>> > > with that
>> > > >> stuff
>> > > >> > let's
>> > > >> > > see
>> > > >> > > > how far
>> > > >> > > > > I go with it.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Piotr
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex
>> Harui
>> > > >> > <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > >> I am using the token
>> generated this
>> > way:
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=X5X8efqqzwvC1rxG4AwVnAZK6ThBKimPB3Nl61yGQFM%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> There is no short code from
>> Google
>> > > Authenticator.
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> -Alex
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr
>> > Zarzycki" <
>> > > >> > > [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> I'm using 2FA
>> authentication,
>> > second
>> > > step
>> > > >> for me is
>> > > >> > typing
>> > > >> > > > short code
>> > > >> > > > >> from
>> > > >> > > > >> Google Authenticator
>> > application. Do
>> > > you use
>> > > >> > something
>> > > >> > > > different?
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42
>> Alex
>> > Harui
>> > > >> > > <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > I don't think git
>> version
>> > matters.
>> > > Are you
>> > > >> using
>> > > >> > your
>> > > >> > > 2fa
>> > > >> > > > token as
>> > > >> > > > >> the
>> > > >> > > > >> > password? It should be a
>> > really long
>> > > >> sequence of
>> > > >> > > characters.
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > Get Outlook for Android<
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=aXoDU8eCG50R2hjNTX5%2FdLIfILY932F86hCQ86aBwWU%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > > >> > > > >> > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
>> > > >> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, July
>> 18, 2019
>> > > 7:43:44 AM
>> > > >> > > > >> > To:
>> [email protected]
>> > > >> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Discuss of
>> > release steps
>> > > >> preparation
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > Maybe Git just should be
>> > updated on
>> > > >> Machine ? I
>> > > >> > see
>> > > >> > > 2.15 and
>> > > >> > > > there
>> > > >> > > > >> is 2.22
>> > > >> > > > >> > already.
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:35 Piotr
>> > > Zarzycki <
>> > > >> > > > [email protected]
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > > When I do git push -
>> I'm
>> > getting
>> > > separate
>> > > >> > window with
>> > > >> > > title
>> > > >> > > > >> GitHub Login
>> > > >> > > > >> > -
>> > > >> > > > >> > > where I can enter my
>> > > login/password. I'm
>> > > >> doing
>> > > >> > that
>> > > >> > > and in
>> > > >> > > > the
>> > > >> > > > >> next step
>> > > >> > > > >> > it
>> > > >> > > > >> > > throws me an error in
>> the
>> > console
>> > > - same
>> > > >> what I
>> > > >> > have
>> > > >> > > pasted
>> > > >> > > > in
>> > > >> > > > >> previous
>> > > >> > > > >> > > email.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > > I'm typing again
>> login and
>> > password
>> > > >> cause It's
>> > > >> > asking
>> > > >> > > me as
>> > > >> > > > you
>> > > >> > > > >> can see
>> > > >> > > > >> > in
>> > > >> > > > >> > > the previous email.
>> In the
>> > results
>> > > I get:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > > remote: Invalid
>> username or
>> > > password.
>> > > >> > > > >> > > fatal: Authentication
>> failed
>> > for '
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=UrZ3i2tKBU53GUOU2sSnFdkibWycS06Gs%2BghnXXm8Qs%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > > > >> > '
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > > Does your steps look
>> the
>> > same ?
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:31
>> > Piotr
>> > > Zarzycki
>> > > >> <
>> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > > napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >> I did that and I'm
>> getting
>> > wrong
>> > > >> password or
>> > > >> > user
>> > > >> > > name, so
>> > > >> > > > that
>> > > >> > > > >> must be
>> > > >> > > > >> > >> different case. Let
>> me try
>> > now
>> > > again.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:21
>> > Alex
>> > > Harui
>> > > >> > > > <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >> napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> It is asking for
>> your
>> > GitHub
>> > > >> username. Type
>> > > >> > it in
>> > > >> > > and hit
>> > > >> > > > >> enter, then
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> it will ask for your
>> > GitHub 2FA
>> > > >> token. We
>> > > >> > don't
>> > > >> > > store our
>> > > >> > > > >> credentials
>> > > >> > > > >> > on
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the machine.
>> That's why
>> > the
>> > > >> Succeeded email
>> > > >> > says
>> > > >> > > you
>> > > >> > > > will
>> > > >> > > > >> need your
>> > > >> > > > >> > GH
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> credentials.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> HTH,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> -Alex
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06
>> AM, "Piotr
>> > > Zarzycki" <
>> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> In the first
>> step I'm
>> > getting
>> > > >> following
>> > > >> > error
>> > > >> > > during
>> > > >> > > > an
>> > > >> > > > >> attempt of
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> login:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> git push
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> fatal:
>> > HttpRequestException
>> > > >> encountered.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> An error
>> occurred
>> > while
>> > > sending
>> > > >> the
>> > > >> > request.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Username for '
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=TLwC7zwvkxeJNyfG0Cffr1ma6Z8BaZnAyhHphJcDADI%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> ':
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> There is being
>> > suggestion
>> > > how to
>> > > >> resolve
>> > > >> > it
>> > > >> > > here [1],
>> > > >> > > > but
>> > > >> > > > >> I'm not
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> sure
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> whether I can
>> do that
>> > on
>> > > remote PC
>> > > >> ?
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1]
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=7St0nBmiwOk%2FC11EquDqo8pznnr15MefTZyUJ9iQxBM%3D&reserved=0
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Piotr
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> czw., 18 lip
>> 2019 o
>> > 15:06
>> > > Piotr
>> > > >> Zarzycki <
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Hi Alex,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I'm getting
>> back to
>> > that.
>> > > Again
>> > > >> some
>> > > >> > > questions:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I think you
>> will
>> > need to
>> > > set up
>> > > >> your PC
>> > > >> > for
>> > > >> > > most,
>> > > >> > > > if not
>> > > >> > > > >> all, of
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the steps
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> in [1] in
>> order to
>> > > >> compare/verify the
>> > > >> > output
>> > > >> > > from
>> > > >> > > > [2].
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Above means
>> that I
>> > don't
>> > > need to
>> > > >> setup
>> > > >> > my own
>> > > >> > > PC
>> > > >> > > > fully,
>> > > >> > > > >> but just
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> to be
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > able to build
>> > project, so
>> > > could
>> > > >> compare
>> > > >> > the
>> > > >> > > results
>> > > >> > > > of
>> > > >> > > > >> build with
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> what
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Jenkins
>> produce ?
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > However you
>> are
>> > saying
>> > > later
>> > > >> that you
>> > > >> > didn't
>> > > >> > > setup
>> > > >> > > > step
>> > > >> > > > >> where
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> there is
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > produced
>> > dist/release
>> > > folder.
>> > > >> What I
>> > > >> > got
>> > > >> > > when I
>> > > >> > > > launch
>> > > >> > > > >> each of
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> those
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > step actually
>> at the
>> > end ?
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Before you
>> answer me
>> > I will
>> > > >> study and
>> > > >> > launch
>> > > >> > > each
>> > > >> > > > of step
>> > > >> > > > >> on
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Jenkins to
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > see what will
>> happen.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Piotr
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > pon., 8 lip
>> 2019 o
>> > 16:59
>> > > Piotr
>> > > >> Zarzycki
>> > > >> > <
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> [email protected]
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Hi,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> I'm occupied
>> till
>> > at least
>> > > >> Wednesday
>> > > >> > with
>> > > >> > > important
>> > > >> > > > >> task, so I
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> hope to
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> look into
>> release on
>> > > Thursday.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Piotr
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> sob., 6 lip
>> 2019 o
>> > 17:23
>> > > Alex
>> > > >> Harui
>> > > >> > > > >> <[email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> napisał(a):
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> On 7/6/19,
>> 7:22 AM,
>> > > "Piotr
>> > > >> Zarzycki" <
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> [email protected]>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Hi Alex,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I
>> finally sat
>> > down
>> > > and
>> > > >> started to
>> > > >> > read
>> > > >> > > all
>> > > >> > > > >> instructions
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1][2]
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> related to
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> RM job.
>> I feel
>> > lost
>> > > with
>> > > >> that a
>> > > >> > bit, so
>> > > >> > > I
>> > > >> > > > wanted to
>> > > >> > > > >> confirm
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> what I
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> just
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> read -
>> correct
>> > me if
>> > > I'm
>> > > >> wrong
>> > > >> > with
>> > > >> > > anything.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 1. First
>> > instruction
>> > > [1] is
>> > > >> > actually
>> > > >> > > steps
>> > > >> > > > which I
>> > > >> > > > >> would be
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> doing on
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> my PC,
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> but
>> automatic
>> > release
>> > > >> process
>> > > >> > actually
>> > > >> > > covers
>> > > >> > > > it
>> > > >> > > > >> for me.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 2. I
>> still
>> > have to
>> > > do at
>> > > >> least
>> > > >> > some of
>> > > >> > > the
>> > > >> > > > steps
>> > > >> > > > >> from [1],
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> but only
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> to
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> compare/verify
>> > > output from
>> > > >> [2]
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I think you
>> will
>> > need to
>> > > set
>> > > >> up your
>> > > >> > PC for
>> > > >> > > most,
>> > > >> > > > if
>> > > >> > > > >> not all,
>> > > >> > > > >> > of
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> steps in
>> [1] in
>> > order to
>> > > >> > compare/verify the
>> > > >> > > > output from
>> > > >> > > > >> [2]. I
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> don't know
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> for sure
>> because I
>> > did
>> > > not
>> > > >> want to
>> > > >> > take the
>> > > >> > > time
>> > > >> > > > to try
>> > > >> > > > >> to set
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> up a new
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> PC. I only
>> had
>> > time to
>> > > do the
>> > > >> > testing of
>> > > >> > > the
>> > > >> > > > >> compare/verify
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> steps on a
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Mac. I want
>> > others to
>> > > >> understand how
>> > > >> > this
>> > > >> > > process
>> > > >> > > > >> works and
>> > > >> > > > >> > make
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> improvements
>> > themselves
>> > > by
>> > > >> debugging
>> > > >> > when
>> > > >> > > things
>> > > >> > > > don't
>> > > >> > > > >> go
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> right. This
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> should not
>> be
>> > something
>> > > that
>> > > >> only I
>> > > >> > know
>> > > >> > > how to
>> > > >> > > > fix.
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> There
>> is a
>> > sentence
>> > > which
>> > > >> saying:
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> "The
>> released
>> > > artifacts
>> > > >> should
>> > > >> > end up on
>> > > >> > > > >> dist/release
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> <
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
>> > > >> > > > >> >
>> > > >> > > > >>
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=M%2F0iYuQ35fAI5wedinzFq1UJrR%2Bi5fRUZv7IQVBxCoo%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
