Harbs,

I feel like Carlos has started his Christmas time ;) I'm glad that you
figured it out! :)

pon., 23 gru 2019 o 21:01 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):

> The asconfig file did not include the necessary metadata. Fixed that…
>
> OK. I’m not getting any errors, but UserForm is dispatching an event not
> listened to by anyone.
>
> Where is the listener supposed to be attached? Maybe it’s listening to the
> wrong object?
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 2019, at 9:35 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I’m getting an error that UserForm.user is null.
> >
> > I have no idea where that should have been set, and I have no idea how
> my commit could have possibly effected that. I don’t see anything that
> would initialize the user variable.
> >
> > If you want my help on this, I’m going to need some direction.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harbs
> >
> >> On Dec 23, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I fixed this, but I have no idea what Crux is supposed to do.
> >>
> >> What am I looking for?
> >>
> >>> On Dec 23, 2019, at 8:30 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I can’t compile Jewel right now.
> >>>
> >>> I’m getting an error:
> >>>
> >>>      [java]
> /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/IconButton.as(104):
> col: 13 Access of possibly undefined property classSelectorList.
> >>>      [java]
> >>>      [java]             classSelectorList.toggle("icon", (_icon !=
> null));
> >>>      [java]             ^
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Dec 23, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org
> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Compilation is ok. The problem is that example is not really working.
> >>>> In that example you should be able to fill the form and push the
> button.
> >>>> After that a JS Alert should be show with the ID of the user record
> saved.
> >>>> That Alert is not show anymore.
> >>>> If you revert locally that commit and recompile Core and then the
> example
> >>>> and run you'll be able to see it again.
> >>>> We have a client complaining about the app stopped to work today
> since they
> >>>> are using Crux.
> >>>> After investigation I was able to trace the problem to that commit.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Carlos
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> El lun., 23 dic. 2019 a las 17:59, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com
> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>) escribió:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I compiled CruxQuickStartBasic and I don’t see anything wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you give me more clues?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FWIW, I used Ant, is the problem specific to Maven?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Dec 23, 2019, at 6:26 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org
> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Harbs,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> seems recent changes break Crux library
> >>>>>> (commit: f50c9990a3190cf681364905525656984ab2e9c5 - Cleaned up
> >>>>>> ElementWrapper and HTMLElementWrapper)
> >>>>>> I'm trying to see what could be the problem. I suppose that is the
> change
> >>>>>> of HTMLElementWrapper now extending ElementWrapper.
> >>>>>> Tried to change one for the other in Crux library, but with no luck
> >>>>>> I'm using /examples/crux/CruxQuickStartBasic to test
> >>>>>> Can you see what could be wrong?
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Carlos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> El dom., 22 dic. 2019 a las 17:24, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com
> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>)
> >>>>> escribió:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is lots of what looks like shared code, so could
> >>>>>>> HTMLElementWrapper extend ElementWrapper?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Totally. Excellent idea.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2019, at 5:46 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In a quick look at history, HTMLElementWrapper's override logic
> was the
> >>>>>>> same as ElementWrapper's.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe as you upgraded HTMLElementWrapper's logic, ElementWrapper
> should
> >>>>>>> have changed as well but didn't?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is lots of what looks like shared code, so could
> >>>>>>> HTMLElementWrapper extend ElementWrapper?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My 2 cents,
> >>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 12/22/19, 1:00 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  We found a weird bug with events and currentTarget.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  I traced the problem to the following:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  The app loads both HTMLElementWrapper and ElementWrapper. The
> lstener
> >>>>>>> overrides in the two are stepping on each other. Here’s what
> happens:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  1. HTMLElementWrapper is loaded first. It replaces
> >>>>>>> goog.events.fireListener with its fireListenerOverride function
> (which
> >>>>>>> calls the existing one when it’s done).
> >>>>>>>>  2. ElementWrapper is loaded next and it replaces the existing
> >>>>>>> goog.events.fireListener function — which was already changed to
> point
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>> HTMLElementWrapper.fireListenerOverride with the one from
> >>>>> ElementWrapper.
> >>>>>>>>  3. When an event is actually dispatched,
> >>>>>>> ElementWrapper.fireListenerOverride first changes the event to a
> royale
> >>>>>>> BrowserEvent instead of a goog one.
> >>>>> HTMLElementWrapper.fireListenerOverride
> >>>>>>> is then called and where it expects a goog BrowserEvent, it in fact
> >>>>> gets a
> >>>>>>> royale BrowserEvent. This causes the wrappedEvent to be the wrong
> type
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>> messes things up down the line.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  I’m not sure of the best way to fix this.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  * We could check the event type in
> HTMLElementWrapper/ElementWrapper,
> >>>>>>> but that’s just-in-case code.
> >>>>>>>>  * I’m not completely sure why we need this logic in both
> >>>>>>> ElementWrapper and HTMLElementWrapper. Is there something that can
> be
> >>>>>>> changed there?
> >>>>>>>>  * Maybe there’s some way for ElementWrapper to know that some
> other
> >>>>>>> class is installing an override?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>  Harbs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to