Hi Alex,

I think the best is that you and Yishay take over the process of release
Apache Royale, to avoid the large process of emails that I think is not
carrying us to get the work done.

Thanks



El lun., 30 mar. 2020 a las 17:22, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:

> This looks like your original offering and does not include my
> recommendations.
>
> I believe the document is missing the requirement that the process of
> creating the Ant release artifacts must verify that the Ant artifacts are
> reproducible by running the Ant scripts.  Again, the scenario is that if an
> Ant user wants to try a local change in an IDE or NPM we want to ensure
> that they can run the Ant "release" target and get the tar.gz or .zip they
> need.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 3/30/20, 2:17 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi Chris,
>
>     thanks. I revise and for me is totally fine :)
>
>
>     El lun., 30 mar. 2020 a las 9:33, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>     > Thanks for that. The Google Doc is a great initiative!
>     >
>     > Harbs
>     >
>     > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>     > wrote:
>     > >
>     > > Hi all,
>     > >
>     > > as the discussion has gone back to: “the release should be as in
> the 13
>     > steps”, I’d like to re-focus on the probably more important parts:
>     > >
>     > > I already started writing up a list of requirements and options to
>     > achieve them:
>     > >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1kMlNfgVVAtTBNb57Qe88-d0vbM-HdohgQFqWCBr-cAg%2Fedit%23&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1a18c979ab3c41569f3c08d7d48b36e6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637211566762921662&amp;sdata=f%2BDwNxJXznUKPyihwBAEoAxE7g%2Fl%2BGW8jkWfwlFqSHQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     > <
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1kMlNfgVVAtTBNb57Qe88-d0vbM-HdohgQFqWCBr-cAg%2Fedit&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1a18c979ab3c41569f3c08d7d48b36e6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637211566762921662&amp;sdata=Ss0aebR6U%2FAl6OYfj%2Flim1nYx3XAp6zNqm1E87rgczQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     > >
>     > > Feel free to continue.
>     > >
>     > > Will not participate in the other discussion as it’s showing a
> typical
>     > pattern of progressional-degradation, and continuing that thread
> will not
>     > bring the project forward.
>     > >
>     > > Chris
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1a18c979ab3c41569f3c08d7d48b36e6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637211566762921662&amp;sdata=6%2Fg%2FGsy67%2FK8Ard9dXecaKBJjHrED8%2BX9pqT4KwRqHk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to