Hi Carlos, I’m not yet convinced by Chris’s arguments. I think the quickest path to a release is for me to start one this evening using the CI server, which I intend to do unless anyone has objections to that.
From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:44:03 PM To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Some info from the current CI server emails Hi Yishay, if we are not doing objections to any of us using any of the RM process available is ok for me. But I though Alex was not on that page for what I saw in his other thread response. About technical requeriments. Are you ok with the evidences Chris reported various times about that the new standard process is all what we need? He responded again some minutes ago to the other list Thanks Carlos El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:19, Yishay Weiss (<yishayj...@hotmail.com>) escribió: > > >If we are discussing if we can use just CI Server, yes I think we need to > >vote, since I'm not with that. > > That’s why I wanted to keep the technical requirements thread concise. > It’s not about whether or not to use the CI server. It’s about a list of > requirements for any build method. Chris has done a good job of gathering > the abstract requirements. We have one issue which is not agreed on by > Alex, and having understood things better, myself. I think we need to vote > on that. > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:07, Yishay Weiss (<yishayj...@hotmail.com>) > escribió: > > > I was hoping the technical requirements thread would spawn a vote on the > > remaining issues. If the result is that the maven solution as it stands > > today does not meet the agreed requirements then we will have no choice > but > > to use the CI server process. > > > > Assuming that’s the situation, I will wait for Alex to report on what > he’s > > doing and if everyone else is ok with it I’ll start working on the > release > > after that, hopefully this evening my time. > > > > Thanks. > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > Subject: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > Hi, > > > > taking into account that Chris and I simplified each CI Server step > (until > > step 7) improving it but removing parameters that was not necessary and > > that streamlined CI Server a lot, I want to analyze recent CI Server > > emails. > > > > Alex, that is the most skilled in the CI Server steps from us, started > > CI step 1 again. Just "CI Step 1" took him to complete from 6:57am to > > 8:14am (my time). That means more than one hour and a quarter. > > > > And he had 3 fails as we can see in our emails. Probably because of > server > > hanging and he need to restart 3 times, or due to things not working > > properly for him, what means the same can happen to the rest of us. > > > > https://imgur.com/a/AgRH9cB > > > > There's still 12 steps more, to do (and many more time consuming that > step > > 1). > > > > Just want to expose it to see if that helps all of us here to > > understand some of the current problems we are having > > > > HTH > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:44 PM Subject: Re: Some info from the current CI server emails Hi Yishay, if we are not doing objections to any of us using any of the RM process available is ok for me. But I though Alex was not on that page for what I saw in his other thread response. About technical requeriments. Are you ok with the evidences Chris reported various times about that the new standard process is all what we need? He responded again some minutes ago to the other list Thanks Carlos El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:19, Yishay Weiss (<yishayj...@hotmail.com>) escribió: > > >If we are discussing if we can use just CI Server, yes I think we need to > >vote, since I'm not with that. > > That’s why I wanted to keep the technical requirements thread concise. > It’s not about whether or not to use the CI server. It’s about a list of > requirements for any build method. Chris has done a good job of gathering > the abstract requirements. We have one issue which is not agreed on by > Alex, and having understood things better, myself. I think we need to vote > on that. > > El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 11:07, Yishay Weiss (<yishayj...@hotmail.com>) > escribió: > > > I was hoping the technical requirements thread would spawn a vote on the > > remaining issues. If the result is that the maven solution as it stands > > today does not meet the agreed requirements then we will have no choice > but > > to use the CI server process. > > > > Assuming that’s the situation, I will wait for Alex to report on what > he’s > > doing and if everyone else is ok with it I’ll start working on the > release > > after that, hopefully this evening my time. > > > > Thanks. > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > Subject: Some info from the current CI server emails > > > > Hi, > > > > taking into account that Chris and I simplified each CI Server step > (until > > step 7) improving it but removing parameters that was not necessary and > > that streamlined CI Server a lot, I want to analyze recent CI Server > > emails. > > > > Alex, that is the most skilled in the CI Server steps from us, started > > CI step 1 again. Just "CI Step 1" took him to complete from 6:57am to > > 8:14am (my time). That means more than one hour and a quarter. > > > > And he had 3 fails as we can see in our emails. Probably because of > server > > hanging and he need to restart 3 times, or due to things not working > > properly for him, what means the same can happen to the rest of us. > > > > https://imgur.com/a/AgRH9cB > > > > There's still 12 steps more, to do (and many more time consuming that > step > > 1). > > > > Just want to expose it to see if that helps all of us here to > > understand some of the current problems we are having > > > > HTH > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
