Yishay, Good example is also an application. When you have Royale application and wanted you to build it by ANT and Maven on a completely clean PC, fresh windows installation.
In case of ANT you need to download Apache Royale SDK and point to it in your script. In case of Maven you need to tell where ARTIFACTS are (in Maven settings.xml) and type "mvn package" in console - this will download and build everything what is needed for application. Thanks, Piotr pon., 20 kwi 2020 o 09:03 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a): > ok Yishay, > > now I see it in central :) > > about your question on why we should use 1.2.0. Maven has build tools as an > artifact, so using 1.1.0 will make people using the old source code no > matter what you have in source. That is one of the features of Maven that > all artifacts and its versions are officially stored in a central repo so > all people knows that they are using the right bits. If you build with Ant, > that will work since Ant just build from the sources you have and does not > have a concept of dependencies coming from a trusted source. > > In this particular case the fix introduced in 1.2.0 was to make > reproducible builds working (or at least is needed for that, since that is > still to be checked if that works), along other fixes in compiler. > > Thanks > > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 19:37, Yishay Weiss (<yishayj...@hotmail.com>) > escribió: > > > Turns out my public key needed to be distributed to a keyserver. > > > > > > > > gpg --keyserver http://keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-keys <fingerprint> > > > > > > > > did the trick. You should see it now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > *Sent:* Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:22:56 PM > > *To:* dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > > *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > > > > > > > Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on > > releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the > folder. > > I’ll see if I can figure this out… > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org > > <carlosrov...@apache.org>> > > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org > > <dev@royale.apache.org>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > > > I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central > > > > > > > https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (< > carlosrov...@apache.org > > >) > > escribió: > > > > > Ok Yishay, > > > > > > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (< > yishayj...@hotmail.com > > >) > > > escribió: > > > > > >> Hi Carlos, > > >> > > >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet. > > >> > > >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org > > <carlosrov...@apache.org>> > > >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM > > >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org > > <dev@royale.apache.org>> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > >> > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> can we consider this vote finished? > > >> > > >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so > the > > >> fixes will be not applied > > >> > > >> Maybe I'm wrong > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) > > >> escribió: > > >> > > >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours > are > > >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-) > > >> > > > >> > Harbs > > >> > > > >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler > > Build > > >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here; > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ > > >> > > > > >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF > > requirements > > >> > on approving a release?', at: > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > >> > > > > >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct > > >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > > >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package > > completes > > >> > successfully > > >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of > > >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler. > > >> > > > > >> > > The KEYS file is at > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS > > >> > > > > >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here: > > >> > > > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064 > > >> > > > > >> > > Please vote to approve this release: > > >> > > +1 Approve the release > > >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to > why) > > >> > > > > >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be > called. > > >> > > > > >> > > The vote passes if there is: > > >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > > >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes > > >> > > > > >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there > will > > be > > >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in > > the > > >> RC, > > >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough > functionality > > >> that > > >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not > in > > >> PMC > > >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their > > >> votes > > >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. > > >> > > > > >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and > > AIR > > >> > version you tested with. > > >> > > > > >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the > > common > > >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading > the > > >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: > > >> > > 1) create an empty folder, > > >> > > 2) download into that folder this file: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml > > >> > > 3) run the script: > > >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3 > > >> > > > > >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the > > >> > packages and build results are always encouraged. > > >> > > > > >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION > > thread > > >> > not this VOTE thread. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Yishay Weiss > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Carlos Rovira > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > *From: *Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:23 PM > > *To: *dev@royale.apache.org > > *Subject: *RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > > > > > > > Thanks for spotting that. It looks like it failed signature validation on > > releasing the folder, even though it had passed it when closing the > folder. > > I’ll see if I can figure this out… > > > > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org > > <carlosrov...@apache.org>> > > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 5:12 PM > > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org > > <dev@royale.apache.org>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > > > I think 1.2.0 must be pushed to maven central > > > > > > > https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.apache.royale.compiler/compiler-build-tools > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 16:10, Carlos Rovira (< > carlosrov...@apache.org > > >) > > escribió: > > > > > Ok Yishay, > > > > > > and is this version used in current 0.9.7 ongoing release process? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 15:37, Yishay Weiss (< > yishayj...@hotmail.com > > >) > > > escribió: > > > > > >> Hi Carlos, > > >> > > >> It’s already been released, just haven’t announced it yet. > > >> > > >> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org > > <carlosrov...@apache.org>> > > >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 4:12 PM > > >> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org > > <dev@royale.apache.org>> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.0 > > >> > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> can we consider this vote finished? > > >> > > >> also, I think current main release is not using this 1.2.0 right? so > the > > >> fixes will be not applied > > >> > > >> Maybe I'm wrong > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> El mié., 15 abr. 2020 a las 23:05, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) > > >> escribió: > > >> > > >> > I’m not going to have the time to look at this before the 72 hours > are > > >> > over, so here’s my official +0 vote… ;-) > > >> > > > >> > Harbs > > >> > > > >> > > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of Apache Royale Compiler > > Build > > >> > Tools. The release candidate can be found here; > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ > > >> > > > > >> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF > > requirements > > >> > on approving a release?', at: > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > >> > > > > >> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > >> > > - SHA and signed packages are correct > > >> > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > > >> > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package > > completes > > >> > successfully > > >> > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of > > >> > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler. > > >> > > > > >> > > The KEYS file is at > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS > > >> > > > > >> > > Maven artifacts are staged here: > > >> > > > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1064 > > >> > > > > >> > > Please vote to approve this release: > > >> > > +1 Approve the release > > >> > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to > why) > > >> > > > > >> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be > called. > > >> > > > > >> > > The vote passes if there is: > > >> > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > > >> > > - More positive votes than negative votes > > >> > > > > >> > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there > will > > be > > >> > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in > > the > > >> RC, > > >> > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough > functionality > > >> that > > >> > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not > in > > >> PMC > > >> > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their > > >> votes > > >> > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. > > >> > > > > >> > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and > > AIR > > >> > version you tested with. > > >> > > > > >> > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the > > common > > >> > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading > the > > >> > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: > > >> > > 1) create an empty folder, > > >> > > 2) download into that folder this file: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/rc3/ApproveBuildTools.xml > > >> > > 3) run the script: > > >> > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.0 -Drc=3 > > >> > > > > >> > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the > > >> > packages and build results are always encouraged. > > >> > > > > >> > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION > > thread > > >> > not this VOTE thread. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Yishay Weiss > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Carlos Rovira > > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
