Agree with Carlos - It may end up with problems. Actually after release
branch should be probably just merged to develop and probably master (not
sure here) without changes.

pon., 20 kwi 2020 o 13:27 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
napisał(a):

> Hi Yishay,
>
> since I did the same in develop, will not be better to just cherry pick my
> commit on release branch?
> I think doing this way will make the merge to develop from release
> problematic since will find different changes (although are the same) and
> you'll need to resolve the merge manually.
>
> maybe I'm wrong
>
> Thanks
>
>
> El lun., 20 abr. 2020 a las 12:58, <yish...@apache.org> escribió:
>
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > yishayw pushed a commit to branch release/0.9.7
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/release/0.9.7 by this
> > push:
> >      new 1b8f24a  Update compiler build tools version
> > 1b8f24a is described below
> >
> > commit 1b8f24aee6bf21d25ae75b039b88c00a596c46bb
> > Author: DESKTOP-RH4S838\Yishay <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 20 13:58:20 2020 +0300
> >
> >     Update compiler build tools version
> > ---
> >  pom.xml | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> > index 3fea91d..1ee3dd9 100644
> > --- a/pom.xml
> > +++ b/pom.xml
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> >
> >
> <project.reporting.outputencoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputencoding>
> >      <maven.version>3.3.1</maven.version>
> >
> > -    <compiler-build-tools.version>1.1.0</compiler-build-tools.version>
> > +    <compiler-build-tools.version>1.2.0</compiler-build-tools.version>
> >      <compiler-jburg-types.version>1.1.0</compiler-jburg-types.version>
> >
> >      <flex.version>4.15.0</flex.version>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to