There should be a apache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js-swf or apache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js
folder with the binary Ant artifact. If you want SWF support you have to run
the setup described in the README
HTH,
-Alex
On 5/11/20, 4:17 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I run into the same problem with TDJ and Maven build as you. However I have
a question - ApproveRoyale.xml - build first stuff by ANT, next Maven - as
I remember in the results of that build by ANT I should have somewhere IDE
ready to use SDK - where it should be ?
Thanks,
Piotr
niedz., 10 maj 2020 o 23:12 Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> I created this for now:
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Notes-0.9.7&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275881102&sdata=012Tc3%2BHsdItwYyO3ZVTS%2BjRjD4xAQ2puZyheqnr7Eo%3D&reserved=0
>
> Feel free to improve it as you see fit.
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:21 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > We definitely should try to prevent these problems, but the
> responsibility
> > for fixing it and preventing it in the future is not the RMs, it is the
> all
> > of our responsibility. So if you can think of a way to clear snapshots,
> > add it to the approval script. If you can think of a way to scan poms
> for
> > -SNAPSHOT, add that too, although we currently do use a few snapshots as
> > build tools. I haven't looked at the pom for TDJ but it could be that
it
> > should not use explicit versions but rather, a property that is set by
> the
> > 13 steps. The online release notes may need to be created in the wiki.
> > Feel free to pitch in and do that, and add whatever you think will help
> our
> > users.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 5/9/20, 3:49 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I generally agree with that, although I don't think it
> should
> > ever
> > be an excuse for avoiding improvements to enhance quality in the
> > future,
> > and we should make sure we avoid this specifically in the future.
> > Nothing is perfect, software development is not particularly unique
> in
> > that
> > regard. But we can assure 'quality' if we have specific standards to
> > meet.
> > So hopefully it makes sense that ensuring that all examples build
> > (same as
> > CI) for future releases makes sense.
> >
> > So I will apply the same approach as you for now and vote EOD my
time
> > after
> > a few more checks.
> > I don't know if there is a 'fix' for this for the future, unless the
> 13
> > steps 'automate' the search and replace in pom files for version
> > 'SNAPSHOT'
> > and for some reason this part is being skipped. Otherwise if it is a
> > manual
> > 'search-and-replace in files' step, then it is probably just
> > something to
> > note for the next release.
> > Perhaps the approve script can be set to clear the snapshots from
> > local m2
> > so we always trap this early?
> >
> > Maybe for this release, the 'fix' can go in as advice in the
> > post-release
> > release notes? With or without a patch (I have one - I was able to
> > complete
> > the ApproveRoyale script after fixing the pom file).
> > Also hopefully we can get to 0.9.8 quickly, which should be possible
> > now
> > with all the work that has been put into the release process, that
> > definitely limits the impact of something like this.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:14 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I voted +1 because the default build scripts for our repos do not
> > build
> > > examples. Most of the examples do build. Please fix or file
bugs
> > for the
> > > problems you found. I'm sure other bugs will eventually be found
> and
> > > filed. The release does not have to be perfect.
> > >
> > > I also voted +1 because, despite the problems reported so far, it
> is
> > my
> > > opinion that the project and community are better off having this
> > package
> > > as its official release instead of having PMC members spend more
> > energy on
> > > the release instead of features and fixes our users really need.
> > There
> > > appear to be simple workarounds for the problems reported.
> > >
> > > I don't think there are any absolute definitions. It is often a
> > judgement
> > > call since software is rarely perfect.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 5/9/20, 12:56 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for confirming that.
> > > So what does that mean in terms of our standards for release?
> > How do I
> > > apply the rules for assessing things here?
> > >
> > > Can I understand clarity about this wording:
> > >
> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> > > ....
> > > - That the build script completes successfully
> > > - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using
> > the SDK.
> > >
> > >
> > > I realise that this is a configuration issue with the build of
> > one
> > > example
> > > only. I feel comfortable that the framework part is building
ok
> > and
> > > although I did not check with outside projects, I tested a few
> of
> > > the built examples, and those that built (that I tested) were
> > fine.
> > >
> > > I guess it comes down to: does the 'build script' referred to
> > above
> > > include
> > > the examples or not? If the 'build script' includes the
> > examples, (as
> > > it
> > > does in CI build), then I cannot in good conscience agree that
> it
> > > 'completes successfully'.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:17 PM Alex Harui
> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I flushed my snapshots and TDJ didn't build.
> > > >
> > > > On 5/8/20, 10:49 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You're probably right. I haven't tested if it would
> build
> > if I
> > > > flushed all snapshots from my local repo.
> > > >
> > > > IMO, something to fix for the next release.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 5/8/20, 10:01 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Actually looking at the pom for TDJ, there is a
> > > >
> > > > <id>copy-themes</id>
> > > > <phase>generate-resources</phase>
> > > > <goals>
> > > > <goal>unpack</goal>
> > > > </goals>
> > > >
> > > > which looks like it is set up for snapshot versions
> of
> > > themes to be
> > > > unpacked.
> > > >
> > > > <version>0.9.7-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this is a problem or not (or the
> cause
> > of the
> > > > other problem
> > > > I am seeing or not).
> > > >
> > > > Appreciate any guidance....
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:46 PM Greg Dove <
> > > greg.d...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex, Yishay, I tried today as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > FWIW I was able to get the js version to work, and
> > > complete the
> > > > > ApproveRoyale sequence for that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried the use-flash variation 3 tiimes so far,
> and
> > did
> > > not
> > > > complete
> > > > > it, so keen to find out what I am doing wrong.
> > > > > I am using the same environment variables
> > configuration
> > > that I
> > > > used daily
> > > > > for regular builds.
> > > > > Everything works through to TourDeJewel, at which
> > point it
> > > hangs
> > > > in the
> > > > > compilation of the app.
> > > > >
> > > > > Prior to that I am seeing things that I don't
> > (believe I)
> > > > normally see for
> > > > > all of the Jewel theme prior to the TDJ
> compilation:
> > > > >
> > > > > [WARNING] Could not transfer metadata
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
> > > > > from/to apache.snapshots (
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275881102&sdata=gMU05OTBHLDU67iNSwqyxx0QWW1uxLOK2GmYKM1UqBI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > ):
> > > > > Failed to transfer file:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275881102&sdata=Dv6NBTXPsyHHroKgPEuuz2FWnVF27vqBx0fjfq8Ljwo%3D&reserved=0
> > > > .
> > > > > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error.
> > > > > [WARNING] Failure to transfer
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
> > > > > from
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=KJQJIBBmu2tQgB7vbAymjw9%2F0AUHDN%2BQITAtWuS99IY%3D&reserved=0
> > > > was cached in the local
> > > > > repository, resolution will not be reattempted
> until
> > the
> > > update
> > > > interval of
> > > > > apache.snapshots has elapsed or updates are
forced.
> > > Original
> > > > error: Could
> > > > > not transfer metadata
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
> > > > > from/to apache.snapshots (
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=KJQJIBBmu2tQgB7vbAymjw9%2F0AUHDN%2BQITAtWuS99IY%3D&reserved=0
> > > > ):
> > > > > Failed to transfer file:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=snA%2FjduFyj3hsswVKYoG1%2BPSEyueJx%2BORF4cQpN6ui8%3D&reserved=0
> > > > .
> > > > > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error.
> > > > > [INFO] Configured Artifact:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Red-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc
> > > > > [INFO] Configured Artifact:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sapphire-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't understand why it is trying to load
> snapshot
> > > versions of
> > > > the
> > > > > themes, or what is going on here. or even if that
> is
> > > causing the
> > > > problem
> > > > > later with the TDJ compilation or not.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have any clues?
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Greg
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:31 AM Alex Harui
> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Carlos,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What scenario are you testing? If you are using
"
> > > > -Duse-flash=true" then
> > > > >> is PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME and other environment
> variable
> > set up
> > > > properly?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Alex
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 5/8/20, 10:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I had a similar experience with approve xml,
> so
> > I'll
> > > check
> > > > as I have
> > > > >> more
> > > > >> time during weekend in other way:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> build_example.compile:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Compiling Ace.swf
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ROYALE_HOME:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js
> > > > >>
> > > > >> GOOG_HOME:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library
> > > > >>
> > > > >> MXMLJSC
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-load-config+=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/config/compile-app-config.xml
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +playerglobal.version=11.1
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flash/Player
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -compiler.debug=true
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
+royalelib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-closure-lib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +configname=royale
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -swf-version
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 14
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-output=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/bin-debug/Ace.swf
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/royale/Ace.mxml
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 0.655243136 seconds
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(74):
> > > > >> col: 0 Error: unable to open
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
'/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/libs/player/11.1/playerglobal.swc'.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml
> > > > >> (line: 74)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> </external-library-path>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> BUILD FAILED
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/ApproveRoyale.xml:781:
> > > The
> > > > >> following error occurred while executing this
> > line:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:659:
> > > > >> The following error occurred while executing
> > this
> > > line:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:77:
> > > > >> The following error occurred while executing
> > this
> > > line:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build_example.xml:157:
> > > > >> mxmlc task failed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Total time: 6 minutes 44 seconds
> > > > >>
> > > > >> El vie., 8 may. 2020 a las 13:44, Yishay
Weiss
> > (<
> > > > >> yishayj...@hotmail.com>)
> > > > >> escribió:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Rc4 had an xml bug, rc3 couldn’t build
maven
> > from
> > > > distribution
> > > > >> sources. I
> > > > >> > tested ApproveRoyale.xml and it worked for
> me
> > for
> > > this
> > > > release.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:40 PM
> > > > >> > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:
> > > > dev@royale.apache.org>
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release
> Apache
> > > Royale 0.9.7
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > What are the changes in comparison to the
> > previous
> > > RC? I'm
> > > > >> interested
> > > > >> > whether I can use ApproveRoyale.xml
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2FApproveRoyale.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=MvbkYJ8g6Ya%2Fai3uZq7t4LVlrw3BoyoADsSJ0WgzfGM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > script
> > > > >> > ?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > pt., 8 maj 2020 o 13:29 <
> > apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > > >> > > Yishay Weiss
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Patreon: *
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=RFrO07D45kfOc3OWIOOuCqtPOVtsC4nGxM62Vd09pO0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=RFrO07D45kfOc3OWIOOuCqtPOVtsC4nGxM62Vd09pO0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >> >*
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Carlos Rovira
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=8r3Um1lc8Tw2LoFJeqWIXQWdGTroDTlFlO%2FBzF8fmKA%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon:
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=RFrO07D45kfOc3OWIOOuCqtPOVtsC4nGxM62Vd09pO0%3D&reserved=0
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf6675cdb756c432660ee08d7f59cd625%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637247926275891099&sdata=RFrO07D45kfOc3OWIOOuCqtPOVtsC4nGxM62Vd09pO0%3D&reserved=0>*
