Actually maybe I need to double double-check this more, thanks for the
prompt. I will do that now.


On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:36 AM Greg Dove <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> There are a few things like this where it does not. I forget exactly the
> rules for that. We are already using this exact same check elsewhere in
> bindings code, possibly since its inception.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:33 AM Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I’m surprised that Closure Compiler renaming doesn’t break this.
>>
>> > On May 28, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Greg Dove <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Alex,
>> >
>> > I hope you are ok with this change:
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/commit/26d4b9cf7c1968160278754a01bd612946ddf41d
>> >
>> >
>> > It makes a big difference in a large codebase I am working on, many
>> > components with bindings that were not working suddenly started working.
>> > In the absence of 'this is IBindingClient' I think the '_bindings in
>> this'
>> > check is as specific as we can get (and very likely faster to execute in
>> > any case).
>> >
>> > Let me know if you have any objections to that, in case I did not
>> consider
>> > something else that is obvious to you.
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > Greg
>>
>>

Reply via email to