Great. FYI you can attach files to Github issues using drag/drop.
https://github.blog/2012-12-07-issue-attachments/ > On Aug 16, 2020, at 3:20 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > Thanks for the clarification. > I created an issue ... unfortunately I couldn't find a way to attach files to > it so I added my google-drive link to it. > > https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues/158 > > Chris > > > > Am 16.08.20, 11:55 schrieb "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > OK. Looks like there’s two issues: > > 1. types with private constructors can not be an argument in methods (both > instance and static methods). > 2. Return types with private constructors only works on static methods. > non-static methods with these return types error. > > Josh was the one who worked on the private constructor feature. Maybe he > has more input. > > Chris, can you attach this test project to a royale-compiler issue? > >> On Aug 16, 2020, at 12:21 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Harbs, >> >> So I whipped up a little example using my enums and the strange thing is, >> that here >> the getQualifiedClassName seems to work. However not the private constructor. >> >> I've zipped up my example here: >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SNMiH5xuUERbIiscuEH_JgcOLrBboj4j/view?usp=sharing >> >> So not really sure what I should do differently. I would be happy to solve >> the private constructor problem and then try to tackle the next one. >> >> Chris >> >> Am 16.08.20, 00:05 schrieb "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: >> >> I’m not sure how you’re using private constructors. >> >> The only two cases I’ve used it was for: >> 1. All static classes >> 2. Singletons where the instance is generated in the class. >> >> It looks like you’re using casting with the Enums? >> >>> On Aug 14, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Any idea what could be causing this? As soon as I remove the "private" in >>> front of the constructor, all is good again. >> >> > >
