I think that you need to manually add MXRoyaleJS.swc (and MXRoyale.swc if
you are targeting SWF too) to your compiler options in asconfig.json, just
like in this example:

https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest/asconfig.json

The MX classes are not included automatically in the default "royale"
config, and you need to opt into using them.

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>


On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
wrote:

> Here is my asconfig.json file. Perhaps I'm missing how this is used. I
> don't use this to compile, but it's necessary for source completion, etc. I
> would imagine this can even be smaller in the cases where Maven is used?
>
> {
>     "config": "royale",
>     "type": "app",
>     "compilerOptions": {
>         "debug": true,
>         "targets": [
>             "JSRoyale"
>         ],
>         "source-map": true,
>         "source-path": [
>             "src/main/royale"
>         ]
>     },
>     "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars
> -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions
> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true -js-default-initializers=true
> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,PostConstruct,PreDestroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient
> -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject",
>     "files": [
>         "src/main/royale/App.mxml"
>     ],
>     "mainClass": "App"
> }
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 8:44 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>
> What does your asconfig.json file look like?
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can compile just fine with Maven, , and have never needed to do
> > anything like that in the past. It's VSCode that is complaining that
> > these imports do not exist.
> >
> > Assuming the new royale-sdk I built is missing something? Or my
> > asconfig may need to be adjusted for the new sdk changes?
> >
> > I followed what Josh explained below, removed
> > "-DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option" and replaced
> > my previously built royale-sdk with the one from a fresh build:
> >
> > royale-asjs\distribution\target\apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
> >
> > Simply unzipped the above and replace my previous. After doing so, all
> > mx imports are reporting as missing (squiggly underlines).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:59 PM
> > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >
> > I wonder if you mean the automatic imports....
> >
> > with maven I often have something like this:
> >
> > -compiler.mxml.imports=
> >             mx.resources.ResourceManager,
> >             org.apache.royale.events.Event,
> >             org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher,
> >             org.apache.royale.events.IEventDispatcher,
> >             mx.events.MouseEvent,
> >             mx.events.FocusEvent,
> >             mx.events.KeyboardEvent,
> >             org.apache.royale.geom.*,
> >             org.apache.royale.core.ClassFactory,
> >             org.apache.royale.core.IFactory;
> >
> > In the <additionalCompilerOptions> nested section of the royale
> > compiler <configuration> tag
> >
> > Is it more that, do you think, or more that you are actually missing
> > the MXRoyale dependency?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:49 PM Brian Raymes
> > <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I should have mentioned, I use Maven to compile.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:32 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> > >
> > > Hi Josh,
> > >
> > > I've done what you've said, and I can now build successfully, thank
> you.
> > > But.. Now, all MX imports cannot be found in my project. I rely
> > > heavily on AMF with my current project, and now my project within
> > > VSCode is showing hundreds of errors, but can compile successfully.
> > >
> > > What could I be missing? I compared the previously built SDK with
> > > the new, and they are definitely structured differently. The MX SWCs
> > > are found within the new.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 9:11 AM
> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, Adobe no longer provides AIR SDK 20.0. The only
> > > version they still offer is AIR 32.0. On macOS, I believe AIR 32.0
> > > is also only downloadable in a .dmg format that the Maven plugin
> > > doesn't know how to process, which makes things even harder. Older
> > > versions of the macOS AIR SDK used to be available in a different
> > > format, like .tbz2 or .tar.gz or something like that, but Adobe
> > > changed to .dmg only at some point. Anyway, this is why building the
> distribution is failing.
> > > Those who can still build are lucky enough to have it in their cache
> > > from before Adobe removed all of the files from the servers.
> > >
> > > But, there's hope! If you build the distribution without specifying
> > > a target folder, it won't try to include Adobe artifacts. It's only
> > > when you build to a folder that the AIR SDK is used in the build
> process.
> > > When you don't specify a target folder, the distribution will go
> > > into a zip or tar.gz file instead. When the build completes, you can
> > > just extract that into a folder, and it's basically the same thing.
> > > If you need playerglobal.swc and the AIR SDK, you can merge them
> > > manually (like we used to do with the Adobe Flex SDK before the Apache
> installer).
> > >
> > > Basically, in your distribution build command, just remove the
> > > -DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option, and it
> > > should work without the AIR SDK. I don't know whether there are
> > > other issues on the develop branch that might also cause the Maven
> > > distribution build to fail, but this is how you deal with the AIR SDK
> part at least.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes
> > > <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for fixing current state of repo.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't been able to successfully build with Maven for quite a
> > > > long while now due to what looks to be shifts with this release.
> > > >
> > > > For one, it seems to repeat ask to install the AIR SDK, but fails
> > > > to notify something, then fails to download as they can't be found.
> > > > This happens about 20 times.
> > > >
> > > > Example:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO]  - Installing Adobe AIR SDK 20.0 Your System-Id: ...........
> > > > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do
> > > > you want to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> > > > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
> > > > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build,
> > > > alternatively to typing y or yes you can also set a system
> > > > property containing your system which is interpreted as equivalent
> > > > to accepting by typing y or
> > > yes:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=...........
> > > > )
> > > > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Yes
> > > > [WARNING] Failed to notify spy
> > > > org.apache.flex.utilities.converter.mavenextension.FlexEventSpy:
> > > > Caught exception while downloading and converting artifact.
> > > > [INFO] Couldn't find artifact: com.adobe.air:20.0:runtime:pom
> > > > [INFO] ===========================================================
> > > >
> > > > Then, it fails to build the distribution because of a potentially
> > > > all of these unresolved artifacts for 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:33 AM
> > > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> > > >
> > > > Hi Yishay,
> > > >
> > > > Where are you with release now ? Build is failing on Maven sight
> > > > for several days, cause it was switched to 0.9.9. Are you going to
> > > > make another attempt this week ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > niedz., 21 mar 2021 o 11:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > I think what I started was reverted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for picking up the slack for me…
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know if you need help from me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Harbs
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mar 21, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Yishay Weiss
> > > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to start a release again, maybe Harbs will pick this
> > > > > > up later
> > > > > when he's less loaded, so if anyone wants to update the release
> > > > > notes this might be a good time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to start afresh, so Harbs, let me know if there are
> > > > > > RCs for
> > > > > Royale or for compiler-build-tools that need cancelling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:51 PM
> > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi! just finished my list of updates for 0.9.8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Others are welcome to add to it for upcoming release! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El mar., 17 nov. 2020 a las 20:07, Josh Tynjala (<
> > > > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I just updated the RELEASE_NOTES.md files in both
> > > > > >> royale-compiler and royale-asjs with my changes for the 0.9.8
> > > > > >> release. Everyone should also
> > > > > add
> > > > > >> their own changes to these files.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Josh Tynjala
> > > > > >> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:25 AM Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >> <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Thanks Harbs!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> @Andrew I think we should all try to add to the list of new
> > > > > >>> features,
> > > > > >> fixes
> > > > > >>> and more. If you could prepare different place holders for
> > > > > >>> compiler-typedefs-asjs, we can all try to fill it
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> thanks
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> El lun., 16 nov. 2020 a las 19:47, Andrew Wetmore (<
> > > > > cottag...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>> )
> > > > > >>> escribió:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Is there a list of new features and fixes since 0.9.7? I
> > > > > >>>> would like to
> > > > > >>> see
> > > > > >>>> if i can at least get good documentation in place about
> > > > > >>>> those
> > > > changes.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> a
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:23 PM Harbs
> > > > > >>>> <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> OK. I’ll start tomorrow.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> (fingers crossed)
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > > > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I think the time zone problems Chris warned are now
> > > > > >>>>>> behind us, and
> > > > > >>> want
> > > > > >>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>> open this thread about releasing 0.9.8. Many months have
> > > > > >>>>>> passed
> > > > > >> and I
> > > > > >>>>> think
> > > > > >>>>>> we need to push a new release soon, I think before the
> > > > > >>>>>> end of the
> > > > > >>> year
> > > > > >>>>> will
> > > > > >>>>>> be the best for us if possible.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> What do you think? Harbs can we count on you to do the task?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Thanks in advance
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >>>>>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software
> > > > > >>>>>> Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > >>>> Andrew Wetmore
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Carlos Rovira
> > > > > >>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software
> > > > > >>> Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to