I thought that I remembered that the Ant build forces line endings when
copying the bin files to avoid this issue. Maybe some are incorrectly being
excluded. Or maybe it's happening only to bin and not to js/bin?

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>


On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:07 AM Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I believe I have found the reason. In our Apache Jenkins machine git
> checkout file and changes it's original line endings. If file was LF on our
> server is CRLF. Checkout any file from our workspace [1]
>
> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/ws/js/bin/
>
> śr., 22 wrz 2021 o 12:26 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Before I go farther into that rabbit hole - anyone have some idea why
> this
> > is happening ?
> >
> > śr., 15 wrz 2021 o 11:11 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I have reported problem with mxmlc during release process. It looks like
> >> Royale distribution build by Ant on Jenkins have different line endings
> >> than that downloaded from nightlies website.
> >>
> >> My Atom text editor shows:
> >> 1) Royale downloaded from here [1] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line
> endings
> >> LF
> >> 2) Royale downloaded from here [2] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line
> endings
> >> CRLF
> >>
> >> Anyone know how to fix this ?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> >> [2] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> Od: Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> >> Date: wt., 11 maj 2021 o 17:54
> >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >> To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Yishay,
> >>
> >> I have downloaded Nightly 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT build prepared by Maven from
> >> here [1]. When I'm trying build our application on Mac OSX I'm getting
> >> following error:
> >>
> >> : /bin/bash:
> >>
> /Users/piotr/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/mxmlc:
> >> /bin/sh^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
> >>
> >> I cannot test whether Ant version of Nightly is not working as well
> cause
> >> it is still failing :( [2] - It would be good if you don't have time to
> >> continue on release just tried to fix build and leave it in a state
> where
> >> it's working correctly.
> >>
> >> Under link [1] there is also old build with 0.9.8, so I downloaded it
> >> and replace mxmlc file in folder /apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/ -
> >> Build of my application started work.
> >>
> >> I downloaded 0.9.9 build on my Windows machine and build same project -
> >> everything works fine - it means that mxmlc.bat is untouched.
> >>
> >> Is it possible that for some reason during commits, merge and changes
> git
> >> change line endings in mxmlc - mac version of file ?
> >>
> >> [1] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/
> >> [2]
> >>
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pt., 7 maj 2021 o 19:19 Brian Raymes <[email protected]>
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Great, thanks all for the prompt help. Most appreciated!
> >>>
> >>> Now, if I can only wrap my head around mysterious binding failures, or
> >>> how to debug them, I'd be set.
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]>
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:17 AM
> >>> To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>>
> >>> That is my understanding as well.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Josh Tynjala
> >>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 10:01 AM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > IIRC, royale-config.xml does not include the MXRoyale swc but
> >>> > flex-config.xml does.
> >>> >
> >>> > HTH,
> >>> > -Alex
> >>> >
> >>> > On 5/7/21, 9:30 AM, "Brian Raymes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     Okay, that worked. Thank you!
> >>> >
> >>> >     Was this changed somewhat recently? I haven't needed this
> >>> > js-library-path before.
> >>> >
> >>> >     -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     From: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]>
> >>> >     Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:20 AM
> >>> >     To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> >     Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >
> >>> >     I think that you need to manually add MXRoyaleJS.swc (and
> >>> > MXRoyale.swc if you are targeting SWF too) to your compiler options
> in
> >>> > asconfig.json, just like in this example:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> >>> > ub.com
> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fexamples%2Fmxroyale%2
> >>> >
> FRemoteObjectAMFTest%2Fasconfig.json&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe
> >>> >
> .com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> >
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4w
> >>> >
> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdat
> >>> > a=7n3lX8iIPiag7%2BsSVRno9J1EANwNNwbabv4352E8izw%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> >
> >>> >     The MX classes are not included automatically in the default
> >>> "royale"
> >>> >     config, and you need to opt into using them.
> >>> >
> >>> >     --
> >>> >     Josh Tynjala
> >>> >     Bowler Hat LLC <
> >>> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C35efef06af8648019
> >>> >
> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
> >>> >
> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
> >>> >
> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >     On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Brian Raymes <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> >     wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     > Here is my asconfig.json file. Perhaps I'm missing how this is
> >>> used.
> >>> > I
> >>> >     > don't use this to compile, but it's necessary for source
> >>> completion,
> >>> >     > etc. I would imagine this can even be smaller in the cases
> where
> >>> > Maven is used?
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > {
> >>> >     >     "config": "royale",
> >>> >     >     "type": "app",
> >>> >     >     "compilerOptions": {
> >>> >     >         "debug": true,
> >>> >     >         "targets": [
> >>> >     >             "JSRoyale"
> >>> >     >         ],
> >>> >     >         "source-map": true,
> >>> >     >         "source-path": [
> >>> >     >             "src/main/royale"
> >>> >     >         ]
> >>> >     >     },
> >>> >     >     "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars
> >>> >     > -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions
> >>> >     > -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
> >>> -js-default-initializers=true
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,PostConstruct,PreDe
> >>> >     >
> -keep-as3-metadata+stroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient
> >>> >     > -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject",
> >>> >     >     "files": [
> >>> >     >         "src/main/royale/App.mxml"
> >>> >     >     ],
> >>> >     >     "mainClass": "App"
> >>> >     > }
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     > From: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 8:44 AM
> >>> >     > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > What does your asconfig.json file look like?
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > --
> >>> >     > Josh Tynjala
> >>> >     > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >>> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C35efef06af8648019
> >>> >
> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
> >>> >
> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
> >>> >
> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> > >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes <
> >>> > [email protected]>
> >>> >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > > I can compile just fine with Maven, , and have never needed
> to
> >>> do
> >>> >     > > anything like that in the past. It's VSCode that is
> >>> > complaining that
> >>> >     > > these imports do not exist.
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > Assuming the new royale-sdk I built is missing something? Or
> my
> >>> >     > > asconfig may need to be adjusted for the new sdk changes?
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > I followed what Josh explained below, removed
> >>> >     > > "-DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option" and
> >>> >     > > replaced my previously built royale-sdk with the one from a
> >>> > fresh
> >>> > build:
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > >
> >>> > royale-asjs\distribution\target\apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > Simply unzipped the above and replace my previous. After
> doing
> >>> so,
> >>> >     > > all mx imports are reporting as missing (squiggly
> underlines).
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     > > From: Greg Dove <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:59 PM
> >>> >     > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > I wonder if you mean the automatic imports....
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > with maven I often have something like this:
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > -compiler.mxml.imports=
> >>> >     > >             mx.resources.ResourceManager,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.Event,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.IEventDispatcher,
> >>> >     > >             mx.events.MouseEvent,
> >>> >     > >             mx.events.FocusEvent,
> >>> >     > >             mx.events.KeyboardEvent,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.geom.*,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.core.ClassFactory,
> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.core.IFactory;
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > In the <additionalCompilerOptions> nested section of the
> royale
> >>> >     > > compiler <configuration> tag
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > Is it more that, do you think, or more that you are actually
> >>> > missing
> >>> >     > > the MXRoyale dependency?
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:49 PM Brian Raymes
> >>> >     > > <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > wrote:
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     > > > I should have mentioned, I use Maven to compile.
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     > > > From: Brian Raymes <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:32 PM
> >>> >     > > > To: [email protected]
> >>> >     > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > Hi Josh,
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > I've done what you've said, and I can now build
> successfully,
> >>> >     > > > thank
> >>> >     > you.
> >>> >     > > > But.. Now, all MX imports cannot be found in my project. I
> >>> rely
> >>> >     > > > heavily on AMF with my current project, and now my project
> >>> > within
> >>> >     > > > VSCode is showing hundreds of errors, but can compile
> >>> > successfully.
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > What could I be missing? I compared the previously built
> SDK
> >>> > with
> >>> >     > > > the new, and they are definitely structured differently.
> The
> >>> MX
> >>> >     > > > SWCs are found within the new.
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > Thoughts?
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > Brian
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     > > > From: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 9:11 AM
> >>> >     > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > Unfortunately, Adobe no longer provides AIR SDK 20.0. The
> >>> only
> >>> >     > > > version they still offer is AIR 32.0. On macOS, I believe
> >>> > AIR
> >>> > 32.0
> >>> >     > > > is also only downloadable in a .dmg format that the Maven
> >>> plugin
> >>> >     > > > doesn't know how to process, which makes things even
> harder.
> >>> > Older
> >>> >     > > > versions of the macOS AIR SDK used to be available in a
> >>> > different
> >>> >     > > > format, like .tbz2 or .tar.gz or something like that, but
> >>> Adobe
> >>> >     > > > changed to .dmg only at some point. Anyway, this is why
> >>> building
> >>> >     > > > the
> >>> >     > distribution is failing.
> >>> >     > > > Those who can still build are lucky enough to have it in
> >>> their
> >>> >     > > > cache from before Adobe removed all of the files from the
> >>> > servers.
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > But, there's hope! If you build the distribution without
> >>> >     > > > specifying a target folder, it won't try to include Adobe
> >>> >     > > > artifacts. It's only when you build to a folder that the
> AIR
> >>> SDK
> >>> >     > > > is used in the build
> >>> >     > process.
> >>> >     > > > When you don't specify a target folder, the distribution
> >>> will go
> >>> >     > > > into a zip or tar.gz file instead. When the build
> completes,
> >>> you
> >>> >     > > > can just extract that into a folder, and it's basically the
> >>> > same thing.
> >>> >     > > > If you need playerglobal.swc and the AIR SDK, you can merge
> >>> them
> >>> >     > > > manually (like we used to do with the Adobe Flex SDK before
> >>> the
> >>> >     > > > Apache
> >>> >     > installer).
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > Basically, in your distribution build command, just remove
> >>> the
> >>> >     > > > -DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option,
> and
> >>> it
> >>> >     > > > should work without the AIR SDK. I don't know whether there
> >>> are
> >>> >     > > > other issues on the develop branch that might also cause
> the
> >>> > Maven
> >>> >     > > > distribution build to fail, but this is how you deal with
> >>> > the AIR
> >>> >     > > > SDK
> >>> >     > part at least.
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > --
> >>> >     > > > Josh Tynjala
> >>> >     > > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >>> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C35efef06af8648019
> >>> >
> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
> >>> >
> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
> >>> >
> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> > >
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes
> >>> >     > > > <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > wrote:
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > > > > +1 for fixing current state of repo.
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > I haven't been able to successfully build with Maven for
> >>> > quite a
> >>> >     > > > > long while now due to what looks to be shifts with this
> >>> > release.
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > For one, it seems to repeat ask to install the AIR SDK,
> but
> >>> >     > > > > fails to notify something, then fails to download as they
> >>> > can't be found.
> >>> >     > > > > This happens about 20 times.
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Example:
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > [INFO]  - Installing Adobe AIR SDK 20.0 Your System-Id:
> >>> > ...........
> >>> >     > > > > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR
> >>> SDK.
> >>> > Do
> >>> >     > > > > you want to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK
> >>> License:
> >>> >     > > > > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
> >>> >     > > > > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build,
> >>> >     > > > > alternatively to typing y or yes you can also set a
> system
> >>> >     > > > > property containing your system which is interpreted as
> >>> >     > > > > equivalent to accepting by typing y or
> >>> >     > > > yes:
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>>
> -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=...........
> >>> >     > > > > )
> >>> >     > > > > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Yes
> >>> >     > > > > [WARNING] Failed to notify spy
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> > org.apache.flex.utilities.converter.mavenextension.FlexEventSpy:
> >>> >     > > > > Caught exception while downloading and converting
> artifact.
> >>> >     > > > > [INFO] Couldn't find artifact:
> >>> com.adobe.air:20.0:runtime:pom
> >>> >     > > > > [INFO]
> >>> >     > > > >
> ===========================================================
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Then, it fails to build the distribution because of a
> >>> >     > > > > potentially all of these unresolved artifacts for
> >>> > 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT.
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> >     > > > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:33 AM
> >>> >     > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Hi Yishay,
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Where are you with release now ? Build is failing on
> Maven
> >>> > sight
> >>> >     > > > > for several days, cause it was switched to 0.9.9. Are you
> >>> > going
> >>> >     > > > > to make another attempt this week ?
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Thanks,
> >>> >     > > > > Piotr
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > niedz., 21 mar 2021 o 11:00 Harbs <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >     > napisał(a):
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > I think what I started was reverted.
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > Thanks for picking up the slack for me…
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > Let me know if you need help from me.
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > Harbs
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > On Mar 21, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Yishay Weiss
> >>> >     > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > > wrote:
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > Hi,
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > I'd like to start a release again, maybe Harbs will
> >>> pick
> >>> >     > > > > > > this up later
> >>> >     > > > > > when he's less loaded, so if anyone wants to update the
> >>> >     > > > > > release notes this might be a good time.
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > I'd like to start afresh, so Harbs, let me know if
> >>> > there are
> >>> >     > > > > > > RCs for
> >>> >     > > > > > Royale or for compiler-build-tools that need
> cancelling.
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > Thanks
> >>> >     > > > > > > ________________________________
> >>> >     > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:51 PM
> >>> >     > > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]
> >
> >>> >     > > > > > > Subject: Re: about releasing 0.9.8
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > Hi! just finished my list of updates for 0.9.8
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > Others are welcome to add to it for upcoming release!
> >>> :)
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > El mar., 17 nov. 2020 a las 20:07, Josh Tynjala (<
> >>> >     > > > > > [email protected]>)
> >>> >     > > > > > > escribió:
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > >> I just updated the RELEASE_NOTES.md files in both
> >>> >     > > > > > >> royale-compiler and royale-asjs with my changes for
> >>> the
> >>> >     > > > > > >> 0.9.8 release. Everyone should also
> >>> >     > > > > > add
> >>> >     > > > > > >> their own changes to these files.
> >>> >     > > > > > >>
> >>> >     > > > > > >> --
> >>> >     > > > > > >> Josh Tynjala
> >>> >     > > > > > >> Bowler Hat LLC <
> >>> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C35efef06af8648019
> >>> >
> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
> >>> >
> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
> >>> >
> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> > >
> >>> >     > > > > > >>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>
> >>> >     > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:25 AM Carlos Rovira
> >>> >     > > > > > >> <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > > >> wrote:
> >>> >     > > > > > >>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Thanks Harbs!
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> @Andrew I think we should all try to add to the
> list
> >>> of
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> new features,
> >>> >     > > > > > >> fixes
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> and more. If you could prepare different place
> >>> > holders for
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> compiler-typedefs-asjs, we can all try to fill it
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> thanks
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> El lun., 16 nov. 2020 a las 19:47, Andrew Wetmore
> (<
> >>> >     > > > > > [email protected]
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> )
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> escribió:
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> Is there a list of new features and fixes since
> >>> 0.9.7?
> >>> > I
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> would like to
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> see
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> if i can at least get good documentation in place
> >>> about
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> those
> >>> >     > > > > changes.
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> a
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:23 PM Harbs
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> <[email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > wrote:
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> OK. I’ll start tomorrow.
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> (fingers crossed)
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> >>> >     > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Hi,
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> I think the time zone problems Chris warned are
> >>> now
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> behind us, and
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> want
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> to
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> open this thread about releasing 0.9.8. Many
> >>> months
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> have passed
> >>> >     > > > > > >> and I
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> think
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> we need to push a new release soon, I think
> >>> > before the
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> end of the
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> year
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> will
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> be the best for us if possible.
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> What do you think? Harbs can we count on you to
> >>> > do the task?
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks in advance
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> --
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache
> Software
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Foundation*
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Jv7ToVc%2FryLL1epbcgxgIBfb0mvGu%2BWnGT4vmaxTMck%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> --
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wh%2FMsvDEhp2%2FxWCpfBXaJIDEIdKNTb9RuY3Btn3i8Lg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> --
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software
> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Foundation*
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
> >>> >     > > > > > >>
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > > > --
> >>> >     > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> >>> >     > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software
> >>> >     > > > > > > Foundation*
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > >
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > --
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> >     > > > >
> >>> >     > > >
> >>> >     > >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>

Reply via email to