As a compromise it may be useful to be able to have the setter receive an Object and the getter return a Class, which is actually an Object (and typically a String), while annotating with ignore coercion. I think we would have a type mismatch issue though, so I wonder if there's a way around that in the compiler. Anyone know?
On 2021/10/17 12:16:28, Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > Container.icon is Class, which is good in Flex for embedded images, but AFAIK > not useful for Royale. Do you guys think we should change the type to a > String at the risk of creating some compile time errors? >
