Hello,
I would not include ExternsJS in the build because it is not ready.

The only JS library included is InspireTree and if I'm honest "I see it as part 
of the Examples project or in the Blog". I have learned a lot by integrating it 
and we have also worked a lot on creating the basic control, the sass, the 
beads (everything can be seen in the repo royale-community-examples) but I 
don't see it as a "standard"... I don't know, maybe Alina has another 
opinion.... 

Hiedra

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> 
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 13:59
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale » Royale-asjs - Build # 2272 - Still Failing!

Some of the snapshot versions in develop are updated after the rc is approved. 
We have an ant script in releasecandidate.xml that does that.

Having said that, ExternsJS is not listed as a module in the projects pom 
(framework\projects\pom.xml), so I think this will need to be updated manually. 
If this project is ready then I think it should be added to that list for the 
next release. FYI Alina and Maria.

It looks like the mvn distribution profile is failing [1] in develop. It might 
be related to the poms that have not been updated yet, I suggest to revisit 
that after the release is complete.

[1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/2272/

From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:20 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale » Royale-asjs - Build # 2272 - Still Failing!

Hi Yishay,

Build is failing after switch to 0.9.10 - I see there are still places where it 
didn't switch in poms from 0.9.9 to 0.9.10 - Should we do this manually and 
commit ? What do you think guys ?

śr., 9 mar 2022 o 10:00 <jenk...@builds.apache.org> napisał(a):

> Royale » Royale-asjs - Build # 2272 - Still Failing:
>
> Check console output at
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/2272/ to view 
> the results.



--

Piotr Zarzycki

Reply via email to