Yes. At the time, I created a branch but I don't remember why Alina uploaded her copy. I'm going to try to remove it. I hope to do it correctly because I remember that we "wasted Harb's time" with the configuration and unit tests (sorry Harb).
I'm sorry, could you do it tonight? Hiedra -----Mensaje original----- De: Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> Enviado el: miƩrcoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2 Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch until it is configured properly? From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:34 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2 Does this warrant another RC? (My gut says yes.) > On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:23 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> wrote: > > Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied > in the other thread. > > Hiedra > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Enviado el: miƩrcoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59 > Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2 > > Any clues why this file shows up? > > B > /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc > > AFAIK, there's shouldn't be binaries in the release artifacts. > >> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> This is the discussion thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Yishay Weiss >