I just updated the source code and downloads pages on the website to link to 0.9.10.
In addition to Tour de Jewel, we'll need a 9.10.0 blog post. As with previous releases, it can simply be based on the changelogs. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:54 PM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree on a point where we need more people who can easily do a release. > Let’s have 2 more releases with someone else than you and discuss 1.0 than. > > In case of announcing I think it should happen once all release related > stuff is fully done. We need to update website and Tour de Jewel build > maybe. Do you know how to do that ? > > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:31, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea to bump the next version, maybe to 0.9.12. Going > > to 1.0 now does not seem like a good idea to me, because it would involve > > some overhead and my aim now is to get somebody else in the team involved > > in the next release and I want to keep it simple for him or her. > > > > I just posted the standard draft announcement, if anybody has suggestions > > on how to handle the npm version confusion there, please respond to that > > thread. > > > > Thanks. > > ________________________________ > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 2:20 PM > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > > Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4 > > > > My suggestion is next release 1.0.0 finally and forgot about that minor > > stuff. > > > > The other thing let’s have clear explanation in announcement. > > > > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 11:52, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > OTOH the release number is incorrect. I published it to 0.9.11 > > > accidentally. I'm afraid I cannot change that to 0.9.10 because I > > > accidentally published to 0.9.10 a year ago. The good news is that I > have > > > fixed the npm release script so this issue should not happen again. The > > bad > > > news is that when we release 0.9.11 we won't be able to overwrite the > > > current 0.9.11 version. > > > > > > Unpublishing 0.9.10 and 0.9.11 is not an option so long as @OmPrakash > > > Muppirala<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com> is listed as a maintainer and > > does > > > not explicitly approve. > > > > > > Not sure what to do here, so any suggestions are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 8:31 PM > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4 > > > > > > In reference to the npm issue with the 0.9.9 release [1], I just wanted > > to > > > mention that I've confirmed that the published npm packages are > > > working correctly for this release. Yay! > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zclk7q1lowsv464797xl5wmxr2skj2ww > > > > > > -- > > > Josh Tynjala > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki >
