+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.zip
Java 1.9
OS: Windows 11 amd64 10.0
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.zip
Binary kit signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: y

Notes:
I tested (as Josh did) both with and without -Duse-flash=true
I was a little confused with the 'Java 1.9' report above. But I think this
is potentially wrong. I will take that to the discussion thread, and it
doesn't change my vote. My actual jdk is 17.


I tested compiling and run of a large js-only project with the built sdk -
no issues




On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:01 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> This is the vote for the 0.9.12 release of Apache Royale.  The release
> candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>
> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is
> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
>     ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>
> You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be
> installed via:
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1099
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
> folks will have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC
> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/ApproveRoyale.xml
> 3) run the script:
>    ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2
>    If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>    ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2
> -Duse-flash=true
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss
>
>

Reply via email to