That would be me. Yes. It was on purpose, but it’s been so long ago that I don’t remember for sure why.
Harbs > On Dec 11, 2024, at 12:18 AM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > > I don't know exactly why the developer who implemented the XML classes > chose instanceof instead of is, but I suspect that they did it on purpose.