+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.2-source-release.zip Java 1.9 OS: Windows 11 amd64 10.0 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: ${readme.ok} RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok} NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y No unapproved binaries in source package: y
Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.2.jar Binary signatures match: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 4:20 AM Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > Package > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.2-source-release.zip > Java 25 > OS: Linux amd64 6.19.11-200.fc43.x86_64 > Source kit signatures match: y > Source kit builds: y > README is ok: ${readme.ok} > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: ${releasenotes.ok} > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > No unapproved licenses or archives in source package: y > No unapproved binaries in source package: y > > Package > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/binaries/compiler-build-tools-1.2.2.jar > Binary signatures match: y > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC > https://bowlerhat.dev/ > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 2:20 AM Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > This is the vote for the 1.2.2 release of Apache Royale Compiler Build > > Tools. The release candidate can be found here; > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/ > > > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on > > approving a release?', at: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > - SHA and signed packages are correct > > - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > > - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes > > successfully > > - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of > > compiler-build-tools and build the compiler. > > > > The KEYS file is at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS > > > > Maven artifacts are staged here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1101 > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > +1 Approve the release > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why) > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > > > > The vote passes if there is: > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > > - More positive votes than negative votes > > > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be > > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the > RC, > > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality > that > > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC > > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their > votes > > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. > > > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR > > version you tested with. > > > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common > > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the > > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: > > 1) create an empty folder, > > 2) download into that folder this file: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.2/rc1/ApproveBuildTools.xml > > 3) run the script: > > ant -e -f ApproveBuildTools.xml -Drelease.version=1.2.2 -Drc=1 > > > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages > > and build results are always encouraged. > > > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not > > this VOTE thread. > > > > Thanks, > > Yishay Weiss > > > > >
