+1
Harbs

> On Jul 27, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sebb,
> 
> Fair point on the missing provenance info. For the record, this RC was built 
> from:
> 
> tag: org.apache.royale.compiler-jburg-types-1.1.1-rc2
> commit: 3d9fca8a1
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/tree/3d9fca8a1/compiler-jburg-types
> 
> Reviewers can verify the source ZIP against the tag with, for example:
> 
> git archive --format=zip --prefix=apache-royale-compiler-jburg-types-1.1.1/ \
>  3d9fca8a1:compiler-jburg-types > /tmp/from-tag.zip
> 
> The vote-email templates on our Jenkins jobs and Ant release scripts have 
> been updated to include tag, commit id and GitHub URL going forward.
> 
> Does this addendum resolve your -1, or would you prefer a fresh RC?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yishay
> ________________________________
> From: sebb <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2026 2:51 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler JBurg Types 1.1.1
> 
> -1
> 
> Just realised that there is no source to compare the artifact against.
> 
> A vote email must include a link to the source code tag which was used
> to create the release.
> (This needs a Git commit id or SVN revision)
> 
> Reviewers need to be able to check that there are no spurious files in
> the source release, and that the files agree with the repo tag.
> This is vital for provenance.
> 
> Sebb
> 
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 at 12:06, Apache Royale Release
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> This is the vote for the 1.1.1 release of Apache Royale Compiler JBurg 
>> Types.  The release candidate can be found here;
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-jburg-types/1.1.1/rc2/
>>  (SVN revision 86200)
>> 
>> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on 
>> approving a release?', at:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> 
>> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> - NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> - That "mvn clean install" in the root of the source package completes 
>> successfully
>> - That you can modify other compiler poms to use that version of 
>> compiler-jburg-types and build the compiler.
>> 
>> The KEYS file is at https://downloads.apache.org/royale/KEYS
>> 
>> Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1103
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> +1 Approve the release
>> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> 
>> The vote passes if there is:
>> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> - More positive votes than negative votes
>> 
>> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be many 
>> bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, but 
>> to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that 
>> folks will have some success trying to use it.  People who are not in PMC 
>> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes 
>> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>> 
>> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR 
>> version you tested with.
>> 
>> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common steps 
>> to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the package and 
>> signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> 1) create an empty folder,
>> 2) download into that folder this file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-jburg-types/1.1.1/rc2/ApproveJBurgTypes.xml
>> 3) run the script:
>>   ant -e -f ApproveJBurgTypes.xml -Drelease.version=1.1.1 -Drc=2
>> 
>> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages 
>> and build results are always encouraged.
>> 
>> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not 
>> this VOTE thread.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss

Reply via email to