Hi Kiet, I'm not sure that a lot of us can disclose over the dev list a lot of the places that Rya is currently running operationally. As far as your other questions, I'm not aware of any hard limitations though I'm not sure I understood the question -- maybe Aaron or Adina (or someone else) might have more insight? I haven't heard of many operational issues with Accumulo, other than a lot of performance can be configuration dependent. Accumulo has a lot of documentation on configuration and installation. If you have more specifics about your particular deployment, we may be able to help more.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Ly, Kiet <[email protected]> wrote: > We are trying to evaluate RYA as potential semantic data lake running on > EMR cluster. If I can get some answer to these questions, it would help us > greatly. > > What is the largest triples store currently in production using RYA in > term of billion/trillion of triples? > Any of the production installation running on EMR in AWS? If yes, what is > the instance types, #of nodes, # of zookeepers, etc.. > Are there any hard limitations (# of nodes, min/max memory, etc…)? > Any operational issues with Accumulo? We had a lot of experience with > Hbase but not with Accumulo. > > > > > Confidentiality Notice:: This email, including attachments, may include > non-public, proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information. > If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized agent of an intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of the information contained in or transmitted with this e-mail is > unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in > error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and permanently > delete this e-mail, its attachments, and any copies of it immediately. You > should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any > purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. > Thank you. >
